Business Intelligence · head to head
Evidence vs Jedox

Evidence
Business Intelligence
Business intelligence as code for teams and AI agents
- From
- $2500/month
- Rated
- -

Jedox
Business Intelligence
Excel-native planning and OLAP modelling for finance teams that refuse to leave spreadsheets
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Evidence high starting price at $2,500/month limits small team adoption; Jedox cube modelling is a specialist skill closer to IBM TM1 than to a modern SaaS planning tool, so most customers depend on a partner or a single internal expert whose departure leaves the model unmaintainable.
- They diverge on capability: Evidence covers Analytics Agent, Jedox covers In-memory OLAP cube.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Evidence and Jedox actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Business Intelligence).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Evidence
- Analytics Agent
- Code-based infrastructure
- Development environment
- Visualization tools
- Embedded analytics
- Enterprise security
- Multi-channel access
Only in Jedox
- In-memory OLAP cube
- Excel add-in
- Web spreadsheet
- Integrator ETL
- Workflow and approvals
- AIssisted planning
- Financial consolidation
- Report designer
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Evidence
- Building version-controlled analytics infrastructurenot Jedox
- Enabling AI agents to answer business questionsnot Jedox
- Delivering analytics through multiple channels (web, Slack, ChatGPT)not Jedox
- Embedding white-labeled analytics in productsnot Jedox
Jedox
- A manufacturer whose budget process is hundreds of Excel files emailed between plants and needs one governed cube without retraining plant controllersnot Evidence
- A mid-market group doing statutory consolidation and management reporting on the same data instead of in two systemsnot Evidence
- A finance team that priced IBM Planning Analytics, found it unaffordable, and still wants cube-based modellingnot Evidence
- A retailer running driver-based sales and workforce plans that must reconcile to the financial budgetnot Evidence
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Evidence
- High starting price at $2,500/month limits small team adoption
- No freemium option for evaluation or learning
- Code-based approach has steeper learning curve than visual tools
- AI credits limited on Team plan; additional credits cost extra
- Requires Git workflow familiarity for effective collaboration
Jedox
- Cube modelling is a specialist skill closer to IBM TM1 than to a modern SaaS planning tool, so most customers depend on a partner or a single internal expert whose departure leaves the model unmaintainable.
- Almost every deployment carries a partner implementation fee that frequently matches or exceeds the first year of licence, and that cost never appears in the vendor comparison you are shown.
- The Excel add-in is the strongest client, which means Mac-based and browser-only users get a materially thinner experience than the Windows majority.
- Dashboards and visual analytics are weaker than dedicated BI tools, so organisations typically keep Power BI or Tableau alongside Jedox and pay for both.
- Insight Partners took a majority stake in 2021, and the pressure toward a cloud subscription base has meant self-managed customers see new capability later than cloud ones.
Pricing, plan by plan
Evidence
$2500/month- Team$2500/month
- Unlimited users
- Monthly billing
- Analytics Agent
- Enterprise$null/custom
- All Team features
- SSO/SAML authentication
- SCIM directory sync
Jedox
On request- Jedox$undefined/year
- Named user subscription, tiered by user count
- Cloud or self-managed deployment
- Modules priced separately for consolidation and add-ons
Which should you pick?
Choose Evidence if
- You need analytics agent.
- You work on Cloud, Embedded.
- You also want code-based infrastructure.
Choose Jedox if
- You need in-memory olap cube.
- You work on Web, Windows, Linux, Cloud.
- You also want excel add-in.
Questions people ask
- Is Evidence or Jedox better?
- Neither clearly leads. Evidence starts at $2500/month and Jedox at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Evidence or Jedox?
- Evidence starts at $2500/month and Jedox at On request.
- Does Evidence or Jedox run on more platforms?
- Evidence runs on Cloud, Embedded. Jedox runs on Web, Windows, Linux, Cloud.
- What is Evidence best used for?
- Evidence is most often used for building version-controlled analytics infrastructure, enabling ai agents to answer business questions, delivering analytics through multiple channels (web, slack, chatgpt), embedding white-labeled analytics in products. Of those, building version-controlled analytics infrastructure and enabling ai agents to answer business questions are not what Jedox is typically brought in for.
- What can Evidence do that Jedox cannot?
- Evidence covers Analytics Agent, Code-based infrastructure, Development environment, Visualization tools. Jedox covers In-memory OLAP cube, Excel add-in, Web spreadsheet, Integrator ETL.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Evidence: Does Evidence have per-user pricing?
No, Evidence offers one flat price for unlimited users at $2,500/month on the Team plan with a 30-day free trial.
SourceJedox: Does Jedox publish pricing?
No. It is quoted per named user with tiering by volume, and modules such as consolidation are priced separately.
Evidence: How many AI credits come with Team plan?
Team plan includes 20,000 AI credits monthly at $0.01 per additional credit. Enterprise offers custom credit packages.
SourceJedox: Is Jedox a BI tool or a planning tool?
A planning tool with reporting attached. Organisations almost always keep a separate BI tool for visual analysis.
Evidence: What is included in the Enterprise plan?
Enterprise adds SSO/SAML, SCIM directory sync, row-level access rules, embedding capabilities, and custom deployment options at custom pricing.
SourceJedox: Can it run on premises?
Yes, on Windows or Linux, though the vendor pushes cloud and self-managed customers receive features later.
Jedox: How does it compare to IBM Planning Analytics?
Similar cube architecture at a lower price point, with a friendlier web layer and a smaller partner ecosystem.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Evidence vs Cube
- Evidence vs Zenlytic
- Evidence vs Hex
- Evidence vs Fabi
- Evidence vs Phocas
- Evidence vs Rill Data
- Evidence vs GoodData
- Evidence vs Grow
- Evidence vs Sisense
- Evidence vs MicroStrategy
- Evidence vs Anaplan
- Evidence vs Deepnote
- Evidence vs Mode
- Evidence vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Evidence vs Periscope Data
- Evidence vs Zoho Analytics
- Evidence vs Baremetrics
- Evidence vs Board International
- Evidence vs Pigment
- Evidence vs Power BI
- Evidence vs Zebra BI
- Evidence vs Qlik Sense
- Evidence vs Databox
- Evidence vs Celonis
- Evidence vs Hebbia
- Evidence vs Chartio
- Evidence vs ChartMogul
- Evidence vs Cyfe
- Evidence vs DashThis
- Evidence vs Dundas BI
- Evidence vs Exa
- Jedox vs Cube
- Jedox vs Zenlytic
- Jedox vs Hex
- Jedox vs Fabi
- Jedox vs Phocas
- Jedox vs Rill Data
- Jedox vs GoodData
- Jedox vs Grow
- Jedox vs Sisense
- Jedox vs MicroStrategy
- Jedox vs Anaplan
- Jedox vs Deepnote
- Jedox vs Mode
- Jedox vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Jedox vs Periscope Data
- Jedox vs Zoho Analytics
- Jedox vs Baremetrics
- Jedox vs Board International
- Jedox vs Pigment
- Jedox vs Power BI
- Jedox vs Zebra BI
- Jedox vs Qlik Sense
- Jedox vs Databox
- Jedox vs Celonis
- Jedox vs Hebbia
- Jedox vs Chartio
- Jedox vs ChartMogul
- Jedox vs Cyfe
- Jedox vs DashThis
- Jedox vs Dundas BI
- Jedox vs Exa
