Cloud · head to head
Jaeger vs Kong Gateway

Kong Gateway
APIs
Open-source and cloud API gateway for managing microservices traffic
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Jaeger tracing is only as good as the instrumentation, and partial instrumentation produces misleading gaps; Kong Gateway the free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- They diverge on capability: Jaeger covers Distributed trace search, Kong Gateway covers API request routing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Jaeger and Kong Gateway actually diverge.
| Attribute | Jaeger | Kong Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, Kubernetes, Docker | web, linux, api |
| Category | Cloud | APIs |
| Founded | Unknown | 2017 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Jaeger
- Distributed trace search
- Dependency graph
- Adaptive sampling
- Pluggable storage
Only in Kong Gateway
- API request routing
- Plugin ecosystem
- Developer portals
- AI Gateway
- Analytics and observability
- SSO and audit logs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Jaeger
- Finding which service in a request path causes the latencynot Kong Gateway
- Understanding real service dependencies rather than the diagram on the wikinot Kong Gateway
- Debugging failures that only appear under production traffic patternsnot Kong Gateway
Kong Gateway
- Routing and securing traffic across microservicesnot Jaeger
- Publishing internal or external developer portalsnot Jaeger
- Managing rate limits and authentication at the API edgenot Jaeger
- Gateway-level routing to multiple LLM providersnot Jaeger
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Jaeger
- Tracing is only as good as the instrumentation, and partial instrumentation produces misleading gaps
- Storage is the real operational cost: high-volume tracing on Elasticsearch or Cassandra is a cluster to run and pay for
- Traces alone, without correlated metrics and logs, leave you switching between tools during an incident
Kong Gateway
- The free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- Plus tier caps API requests at 1M/month before incurring per-million overage charges.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and not published, making budgeting harder without sales contact.
- Configuration and plugin management can require significant operational expertise to run at scale.
Pricing, plan by plan
Jaeger
Free- JaegerFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Kong Gateway
Free- Free TrialFree
- 30-day enterprise functionality trial
- Unlimited gateways
- 30-day analytics retention
- Plus$undefined/month
- Up to 5 serverless, 2 hybrid, 2 dedicated cloud gateways
- 1M API requests/month included
- Up to 2 developer portals
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited hybrid and dedicated cloud gateways
- Unlimited developer portals
- SSO and audit logs
Which should you pick?
Choose Jaeger if
- You need distributed trace search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes, Docker.
- You also want dependency graph.
Choose Kong Gateway if
- You need api request routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, api.
- You also want plugin ecosystem.
Questions people ask
- Is Jaeger or Kong Gateway better?
- Neither clearly leads. Jaeger starts at Free and Kong Gateway at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Jaeger or Kong Gateway?
- Jaeger starts at Free and Kong Gateway at Free.
- Does Jaeger or Kong Gateway run on more platforms?
- Jaeger runs on Linux, Kubernetes, Docker. Kong Gateway runs on web, linux, api.
- Can I use Jaeger for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Jaeger best used for?
- Jaeger is most often used for finding which service in a request path causes the latency, understanding real service dependencies rather than the diagram on the wiki, debugging failures that only appear under production traffic patterns. Of those, finding which service in a request path causes the latency and understanding real service dependencies rather than the diagram on the wiki are not what Kong Gateway is typically brought in for.
- What can Jaeger do that Kong Gateway cannot?
- Jaeger covers Distributed trace search, Dependency graph, Adaptive sampling, Pluggable storage. Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Plugin ecosystem, Developer portals, AI Gateway.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Jaeger: Is Jaeger free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Costs are the storage backend you run.
Kong Gateway: Is Kong Gateway free?
Kong's core gateway is open source and free to self-host. Kong Konnect, the managed cloud platform, offers a 30-day free trial before moving to paid Plus or custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceJaeger: Do I use Jaeger or OpenTelemetry?
Both, usually. Instrument with OpenTelemetry and use Jaeger to store and query the traces.
Kong Gateway: How is usage metered on the Plus plan?
The Plus plan includes 1M API requests per month, with additional usage billed at $200 per extra 1 million requests up to a 10M/month cap, plus per-gateway and per-LLM-model charges.
SourceJaeger: Does Jaeger handle metrics and logs?
No. It is a tracing system. Metrics and logs need Prometheus, Loki or an equivalent.
Kong Gateway: What support is included?
Plus includes email support with a 2-business-day SLA, while Enterprise adds dedicated success managers and professional services.
SourceRelated pages
More on Kong Gateway
Other head to heads
- Jaeger vs Zipkin
- Jaeger vs Grafana Cloud
- Jaeger vs VictoriaMetrics
- Jaeger vs Fastly
- Jaeger vs HAProxy
- Jaeger vs Anyscale
- Jaeger vs Proxmox VE
- Jaeger vs Rancher
- Jaeger vs OpenEBS
- Jaeger vs DeepInfra
- Jaeger vs Go
- Jaeger vs Packer
- Jaeger vs Caddy
- Jaeger vs Cerebrium
- Jaeger vs K3s
- Jaeger vs Tyk
- Jaeger vs Moesif
- Jaeger vs Treblle
- Jaeger vs Convoy
- Jaeger vs Janus Gateway
- Jaeger vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Jaeger vs Gravitee
- Jaeger vs Strapi
- Jaeger vs WSO2 API Manager
- Jaeger vs AWS API Gateway
- Jaeger vs GraphQL Apollo
- Jaeger vs Appwrite
- Jaeger vs Payload CMS
- Jaeger vs Portkey
- Jaeger vs Prisma
- Jaeger vs RapidAPI
- Jaeger vs REST Client VSCode
- Jaeger vs Rutter
- Kong Gateway vs Zipkin
- Kong Gateway vs Grafana Cloud
- Kong Gateway vs VictoriaMetrics
- Kong Gateway vs Fastly
- Kong Gateway vs HAProxy
- Kong Gateway vs Anyscale
- Kong Gateway vs Proxmox VE
- Kong Gateway vs Rancher
- Kong Gateway vs OpenEBS
- Kong Gateway vs DeepInfra
- Kong Gateway vs Go
- Kong Gateway vs Packer
- Kong Gateway vs Caddy
- Kong Gateway vs Cerebrium
- Kong Gateway vs K3s
- Kong Gateway vs Tyk
- Kong Gateway vs Moesif
- Kong Gateway vs Treblle
- Kong Gateway vs Convoy
- Kong Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Gravitee
- Kong Gateway vs Strapi
- Kong Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong Gateway vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Kong Gateway vs Appwrite
- Kong Gateway vs Payload CMS
- Kong Gateway vs Portkey
- Kong Gateway vs Prisma
- Kong Gateway vs RapidAPI
- Kong Gateway vs REST Client VSCode
- Kong Gateway vs Rutter

