Networking · head to head
Ivanti vs Netdata

Ivanti
Networking
Security, service management, and unified endpoint management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Netdata
Networking
Per-second metrics collection with automatic dashboards and on-node anomaly detection
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Netdata has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Ivanti no pricing information published - enterprise custom pricing required; Netdata the dashboard interface is under a restrictive Netdata licence rather than GPL and is served from Netdata infrastructure by default, so the deployment is not fully self-contained without extra configuration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ivanti and Netdata actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ivanti
Nothing recorded that Netdata does not also cover.
Only in Netdata
- Per-second collection
- Zero-configuration discovery
- Edge machine learning
- Tiered database engine
- Streaming and replication
- Health alarms
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ivanti
- Controlling device compliance and patches for remote workforcesnot Netdata
- Automating service ticketing and change processes at enterprise scalenot Netdata
- Enforcing device compliance before network access in regulated industriesnot Netdata
- Prioritizing vulnerability patches by risk levelnot Netdata
- Enabling passwordless zero-trust access without VPN infrastructurenot Netdata
Netdata
- Diagnosing a short-lived performance incident where one-minute averages hide the spike entirelynot Ivanti
- Kubernetes clusters where per-series billing from a hosted vendor has become the largest observability costnot Ivanti
- Adding dense host visibility to an estate that already has Prometheus for application metricsnot Ivanti
- Small teams with no monitoring engineer who need working dashboards on the day of installationnot Ivanti
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ivanti
- no pricing information published - enterprise custom pricing required
Netdata
- The dashboard interface is under a restrictive Netdata licence rather than GPL and is served from Netdata infrastructure by default, so the deployment is not fully self-contained without extra configuration.
- Retention is limited by disk on each node unless you build and maintain a parent tier, which makes it a poor archive for year-over-year capacity planning.
- Per-second collection consumes noticeable CPU and memory on small or heavily loaded nodes, and on constrained edge hardware the monitoring becomes part of the problem.
- Default alerting is generous and fires on conditions many teams consider normal, so the first weeks involve pruning alarms rather than responding to them.
- Fleet-level features that make it usable across hundreds of nodes sit in Netdata Cloud, so the free agent alone leaves you visiting individual node dashboards.
Pricing, plan by plan
Ivanti
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Ivanti review.
Netdata
Free- Netdata AgentFree
- GPLv3 agent with unlimited nodes
- Per-second metrics and edge anomaly detection
- Local dashboards and alerting
- Netdata Cloud paid tiers$undefined/month
- Per-node subscription for fleet management features
- Role based access control and longer alert history
- Business and enterprise support options
Which should you pick?
Choose Ivanti if
Nothing in the data separates Ivanti from Netdata on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Netdata if
- You need per-second collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, Docker, Kubernetes, Windows.
- You also want zero-configuration discovery.
Questions people ask
- Is Ivanti or Netdata better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ivanti starts at On request and Netdata at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ivanti or Netdata?
- Netdata has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Ivanti and Free for Netdata.
- Does Ivanti or Netdata run on more platforms?
- Ivanti runs on Web. Netdata runs on Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, Docker, Kubernetes, Windows.
- Can I use Netdata for free?
- Yes. Netdata has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Ivanti starts at On request.
- What is Ivanti best used for?
- Ivanti is most often used for controlling device compliance and patches for remote workforces, automating service ticketing and change processes at enterprise scale, enforcing device compliance before network access in regulated industries, prioritizing vulnerability patches by risk level. Of those, controlling device compliance and patches for remote workforces and automating service ticketing and change processes at enterprise scale are not what Netdata is typically brought in for.
- What can Ivanti do that Netdata cannot?
- Netdata covers Per-second collection, Zero-configuration discovery, Edge machine learning, Tiered database engine.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ivanti: How much does Ivanti cost?
Ivanti does not publish pricing on their website. As an enterprise solution, pricing is customized based on organizational needs. Contact Ivanti through their website to request a demo and pricing information.
SourceNetdata: Is Netdata fully open source?
The agent is GPLv3. The current dashboard interface is under a separate restrictive licence, so the complete product is open core rather than open source.
Netdata: Can it run without any connection to Netdata Cloud?
Yes, agents work standalone and dashboards can be served locally, but you lose fleet-wide views and need to configure local interface serving deliberately.
Netdata: Does it replace Prometheus?
For host and container infrastructure metrics it often does. For custom application metrics with an existing exporter ecosystem and long retention, most teams keep both.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Ivanti vs Consul
- Ivanti vs Cloudflare
- Ivanti vs Grafana
- Ivanti vs Prometheus
- Ivanti vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Ivanti vs Tailscale
- Ivanti vs Auvik
- Ivanti vs Cisco Meraki
- Ivanti vs Catchpoint
- Ivanti vs Icinga
- Ivanti vs Domotz
- Ivanti vs HiveMQ
- Ivanti vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Ivanti vs Nebula
- Ivanti vs ngrok
- Ivanti vs Palo Alto Networks
- Ivanti vs Splunk
- Ivanti vs Twingate
- Ivanti vs Zabbix
- Ivanti vs Traefik
- Ivanti vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Ivanti vs NetBird
- Ivanti vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Ivanti vs Headscale
- Ivanti vs OPNsense
- Ivanti vs ThousandEyes
- Netdata vs Consul
- Netdata vs Cloudflare
- Netdata vs Grafana
- Netdata vs Prometheus
- Netdata vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Netdata vs Tailscale
- Netdata vs Auvik
- Netdata vs Cisco Meraki
- Netdata vs Catchpoint
- Netdata vs Icinga
- Netdata vs Domotz
- Netdata vs HiveMQ
- Netdata vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Netdata vs Nebula
- Netdata vs ngrok
- Netdata vs Palo Alto Networks
- Netdata vs Splunk
- Netdata vs Twingate
- Netdata vs Zabbix
- Netdata vs Traefik
- Netdata vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Netdata vs NetBird
- Netdata vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Netdata vs Headscale
- Netdata vs OPNsense
- Netdata vs ThousandEyes
