Networking · head to head
Headscale vs Ivanti

Headscale
Networking
Open source reimplementation of the Tailscale coordination server for a single organisation
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Ivanti
Networking
Security, service management, and unified endpoint management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Headscale has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Headscale the clients are proprietary software maintained by a company with no obligation to Headscale, so a client update can change protocol behaviour and break your control server until volunteers catch up.; Ivanti no pricing information published - enterprise custom pricing required
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Headscale and Ivanti actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Headscale
- Self hosted control server
- Access control policies
- User separation
- Pre-authentication keys
- Subnet routers and exit nodes
- Own or shared DERP
Only in Ivanti
Nothing recorded that Headscale does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Headscale
- Running a mesh network where no third party may hold the device registrynot Ivanti
- A homelab or personal fleet where paying per user for a hosted control plane is not worth itnot Ivanti
- Air gapped or restricted environments that cannot reach an external coordination servicenot Ivanti
- Keeping the Tailscale client experience while removing the vendor from the trust pathnot Ivanti
Ivanti
- Controlling device compliance and patches for remote workforcesnot Headscale
- Automating service ticketing and change processes at enterprise scalenot Headscale
- Enforcing device compliance before network access in regulated industriesnot Headscale
- Prioritizing vulnerability patches by risk levelnot Headscale
- Enabling passwordless zero-trust access without VPN infrastructurenot Headscale
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Headscale
- The clients are proprietary software maintained by a company with no obligation to Headscale, so a client update can change protocol behaviour and break your control server until volunteers catch up.
- Features that live on the vendor side, including the admin console, Funnel and app connectors, do not exist here and cannot be added, so feature comparisons against Tailscale are misleading.
- There is no official web interface, so day to day administration is a command line tool or one of several unofficial front ends of varying quality and maintenance.
- It is deliberately single tenant, so a managed service provider cannot use one deployment to serve several customer networks.
- Upgrades have required database migrations and policy format changes between releases, and with no support contract a failed migration on the control server is your problem alone.
Ivanti
- no pricing information published - enterprise custom pricing required
Pricing, plan by plan
Headscale
Free- HeadscaleFree
- Full functionality, no node limit
- Official Tailscale clients on every platform
- No vendor account required
Ivanti
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Ivanti review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Headscale if
- You need self hosted control server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker.
- You also want access control policies.
Choose Ivanti if
Nothing in the data separates Ivanti from Headscale on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Headscale or Ivanti better?
- Neither clearly leads. Headscale starts at Free and Ivanti at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Headscale or Ivanti?
- Headscale has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Headscale and On request for Ivanti.
- Does Headscale or Ivanti run on more platforms?
- Headscale runs on Linux, Docker. Ivanti runs on Web.
- Can I use Headscale for free?
- Yes. Headscale has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Ivanti starts at On request.
- What is Headscale best used for?
- Headscale is most often used for running a mesh network where no third party may hold the device registry, a homelab or personal fleet where paying per user for a hosted control plane is not worth it, air gapped or restricted environments that cannot reach an external coordination service, keeping the tailscale client experience while removing the vendor from the trust path. Of those, running a mesh network where no third party may hold the device registry and a homelab or personal fleet where paying per user for a hosted control plane is not worth it are not what Ivanti is typically brought in for.
- What can Headscale do that Ivanti cannot?
- Headscale covers Self hosted control server, Access control policies, User separation, Pre-authentication keys.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Headscale: Is Headscale made by Tailscale?
No. It is an independent community project. Tailscale acknowledges it but does not support it, and the clients it relies on are the vendor ones.
Ivanti: How much does Ivanti cost?
Ivanti does not publish pricing on their website. As an enterprise solution, pricing is customized based on organizational needs. Contact Ivanti through their website to request a demo and pricing information.
SourceHeadscale: What do I lose compared with the hosted service?
The admin console, the vendor relay network unless you use the public DERP servers, and hosted only features such as Funnel and app connectors.
Headscale: Can I still use the public relay servers?
Yes, the default configuration can use them, though many self hosters run their own DERP to remove that dependency.
Headscale: Is it suitable for a company network?
For a technical team, yes. There is no vendor to escalate to, so it needs someone on staff who is willing to own the control server.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Headscale vs NetBird
- Headscale vs Tailscale
- Headscale vs Nebula
- Headscale vs LibreNMS
- Headscale vs OpenVPN
- Headscale vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Headscale vs pfSense
- Headscale vs Cisco Meraki
- Headscale vs Zabbix
- Headscale vs Netdata
- Headscale vs OPNsense
- Headscale vs ZeroTier
- Headscale vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Headscale vs ngrok
- Headscale vs Palo Alto Networks
- Headscale vs Splunk
- Headscale vs Twingate
- Headscale vs Consul
- Headscale vs Cloudflare
- Headscale vs Grafana
- Headscale vs Prometheus
- Headscale vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Headscale vs Auvik
- Headscale vs Catchpoint
- Headscale vs Icinga
- Headscale vs Domotz
- Headscale vs HiveMQ
- Ivanti vs NetBird
- Ivanti vs Tailscale
- Ivanti vs Nebula
- Ivanti vs LibreNMS
- Ivanti vs OpenVPN
- Ivanti vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Ivanti vs pfSense
- Ivanti vs Cisco Meraki
- Ivanti vs Zabbix
- Ivanti vs Netdata
- Ivanti vs OPNsense
- Ivanti vs ZeroTier
- Ivanti vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Ivanti vs ngrok
- Ivanti vs Palo Alto Networks
- Ivanti vs Splunk
- Ivanti vs Twingate
- Ivanti vs Consul
- Ivanti vs Cloudflare
- Ivanti vs Grafana
- Ivanti vs Prometheus
- Ivanti vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Ivanti vs Auvik
- Ivanti vs Catchpoint
- Ivanti vs Icinga
- Ivanti vs Domotz
- Ivanti vs HiveMQ
