Design · head to head
InVision vs Namespace

Namespace
Developer Tools
The dev platform for the next 100 billion commits
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- InVision is a digital product design platform; Namespace is a developer infrastructure platform.
- Free plans on both; paid from $25/mo and $100/mo.
- Only InVision lists interactive prototypes; only Namespace lists GitHub Actions runners.
- Where InVision falls short: service discontinued as of end of 2024; no longer available or supported.
- Where Namespace falls short: developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which InVision and Namespace actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for Namespace.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in InVision
- Interactive prototypes
- Design collaboration
- Freehand whiteboarding
- Design system manager
- Inspect mode
- Comments & feedback
- Version control
- User testing
Only in Namespace
- Devboxes
- GitHub Actions runners
- Docker builds
- Cross-invocation caching
- NVMe storage
- High-speed networking
- Multiple OS support
- Bazel and Turborepo support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
InVision
- Prototype creationnot Namespace
- Design feedbacknot Namespace
- Whiteboarding sessionsnot Namespace
- Design handoffnot Namespace
- User testingnot Namespace
Namespace
- Providing AI coding agents with cloud-based development environmentsnot InVision
- Accelerating CI builds with faster GitHub Actions runnersnot InVision
- Distributing builds across teams with managed infrastructurenot InVision
- Scaling development velocity for monorepo organizationsnot InVision
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
InVision
- Service discontinued as of end of 2024; no longer available or supported
- Workflow required constant switching between design software (Sketch/Photoshop) and InVision for prototyping, creating inefficiency
- Performance issues and glitches reported, especially with larger projects
- Limited development capabilities; required additional hosting and developer support for deployment
- Could not export working web or mobile applications without additional development
Namespace
- Developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear
- Team plan $100/mo is competitive but usage limits may be tight
- Devbox pricing separate at $0.004/minute could add up quickly
- Enterprise plan requires custom sales conversation
Pricing, plan by plan
InVision
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the InVision review.
Namespace
Free- DeveloperFree
- Pay-as-you-go
- On-demand compute
- Docker builds
- Team$100/mo
- 100,000 unit minutes
- 1,000 Docker builds
- Everything in Developer
- Business$250/mo
- 250,000 unit minutes
- 2,500 Docker builds
- Everything in Team
- EnterpriseOn request
- Custom compute/Docker build limits
- Audit log export
- Enterprise SSO
Which should you pick?
Choose InVision if
- You need interactive prototypes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want design collaboration.
Choose Namespace if
- You need devboxes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux.
- You also want github actions runners.
Questions people ask
- Is InVision or Namespace better?
- Neither clearly leads. InVision starts at Free and Namespace at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, InVision or Namespace?
- InVision starts at Free and Namespace at Free.
- Does InVision or Namespace run on more platforms?
- InVision runs on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android. Namespace runs on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux.
- Can I use InVision for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is InVision best used for?
- InVision is most often used for prototype creation, design feedback, whiteboarding sessions, design handoff. Of those, prototype creation and design feedback are not what Namespace is typically brought in for.
- What can InVision do that Namespace cannot?
- InVision covers Interactive prototypes, Design collaboration, Freehand whiteboarding, Design system manager. Namespace covers Devboxes, GitHub Actions runners, Docker builds, Cross-invocation caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
InVision: Is InVision still active and supported in 2026?
No. InVision announced discontinuation of all services by end of 2024. The platform is no longer available or supported.
SourceNamespace: How is compute usage metered on the Developer plan?
Developer plan uses pay-as-you-go billing. Devboxes bill at $0.004 per minute. Storage and caching services have separate usage-based fees. A 30-day free trial is available to test usage patterns.
SourceInVision: What were InVision's core features?
InVision allowed designers to transform designs into interactive prototypes and mockups for web and mobile. It supported Craft Player for Sketch, Craft Sync for Photoshop, and preview mode in Studio, enabling design-to-prototype workflows.
SourceNamespace: What is the difference between Team and Business plans?
Team ($100/mo) includes 100,000 unit minutes and 1,000 Docker builds with email support. Business ($250/mo) includes 250,000 unit minutes, 2,500 Docker builds, and high concurrency with a dedicated Slack channel.
SourceInVision: What were InVision's pricing plans?
InVision offered Free ($0), Starter ($25/month), Professional ($99/month), and Team plans. Annual billing provided a 10% discount. Free plan included basic prototyping; paid plans added collaboration and file access.
SourceNamespace: Can Namespace support AI coding agents?
Yes, Namespace Devboxes are specifically designed as feature-rich development environments for AI coding agents, with full tooling and performance optimization.
SourceInVision: Why did InVision fail in the market?
InVision's market position was disrupted by Figma, which unified design, prototyping, and collaboration in a single web-based platform. InVision required switching between design software and prototyping, creating friction and reducing competitiveness.
SourceInVision: What integrations did InVision support?
InVision integrated with design tools like Sketch and Photoshop, and supported sharing and collaboration workflows. The platform did not support deployment or direct development integration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- InVision vs Figma
- InVision vs Adobe XD
- InVision vs Sketch
- InVision vs Proto.io
- InVision vs Framer
- InVision vs Maze
- InVision vs Marvel
- InVision vs ProtoPie
- InVision vs Origami Studio
- InVision vs Principle
- InVision vs Axure RP
- InVision vs Procreate
- InVision vs Inkscape
- InVision vs Krita
- InVision vs Linearity Curve
- InVision vs CorelDRAW Graphics Suite
- InVision vs Spline
- InVision vs Xara Designer Pro+
- InVision vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- InVision vs CodeSandbox
- InVision vs WarpBuild
- InVision vs Depot
- InVision vs Blacksmith
- InVision vs Earthly
- InVision vs Kubernetes
- InVision vs GitLab
- InVision vs Jenkins
- InVision vs LaunchDarkly
- InVision vs Terraform
- InVision vs Daytona
- InVision vs HCP Terraform
- InVision vs Helm
- InVision vs Jitsu
- InVision vs Notepad++
- InVision vs Postman
- InVision vs Prettier
- Namespace vs Figma
- Namespace vs Adobe XD
- Namespace vs Sketch
- Namespace vs Proto.io
- Namespace vs Framer
- Namespace vs Maze
- Namespace vs Marvel
- Namespace vs ProtoPie
- Namespace vs Origami Studio
- Namespace vs Principle
- Namespace vs Axure RP
- Namespace vs Procreate
- Namespace vs Inkscape
- Namespace vs Krita
- Namespace vs Linearity Curve
- Namespace vs CorelDRAW Graphics Suite
- Namespace vs Spline
- Namespace vs Xara Designer Pro+
- Namespace vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Namespace vs CodeSandbox
- Namespace vs WarpBuild
- Namespace vs Depot
- Namespace vs Blacksmith
- Namespace vs Earthly
- Namespace vs Kubernetes
- Namespace vs GitLab
- Namespace vs Jenkins
- Namespace vs LaunchDarkly
- Namespace vs Terraform
- Namespace vs Daytona
- Namespace vs HCP Terraform
- Namespace vs Helm
- Namespace vs Jitsu
- Namespace vs Notepad++
- Namespace vs Postman
- Namespace vs Prettier

