Design · head to head
InVision vs Jitsu

Jitsu
Developer Tools
Open source event pipeline that streams behavioural data to your own warehouse
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- InVision is a digital product design platform; Jitsu is an MIT-licensed alternative to Segment.
- Free plans on both; paid from $25/mo and $99/mo.
- Only InVision lists interactive prototypes; only Jitsu lists event collection.
- Where InVision falls short: service discontinued as of end of 2024; no longer available or supported.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which InVision and Jitsu actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: pricing model for InVision, founded for Jitsu.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in InVision
- Interactive prototypes
- Design collaboration
- Freehand whiteboarding
- Design system manager
- Inspect mode
- Comments & feedback
- Version control
- User testing
Only in Jitsu
- Event collection
- Warehouse destinations
- Connector syncs
- Transformations
- Bundled ClickHouse
- Event debugger
- Self-hosting
- Custom domains
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
InVision
- Prototype creationnot Jitsu
- Design feedbacknot Jitsu
- Whiteboarding sessionsnot Jitsu
- Design handoffnot Jitsu
- User testingnot Jitsu
Jitsu
- A team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to Snowflakenot InVision
- An engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own VPC for data residency or security review reasonsnot InVision
- A product analytics setup that wants raw events in the warehouse as the source of truth rather than trapped in a vendor toolnot InVision
- A startup that needs first-party event collection on its own domain to reduce loss from tracker blocking without paying CDP pricesnot InVision
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
InVision
- Service discontinued as of end of 2024; no longer available or supported
- Workflow required constant switching between design software (Sketch/Photoshop) and InVision for prototyping, creating inefficiency
- Performance issues and glitches reported, especially with larger projects
- Limited development capabilities; required additional hosting and developer support for deployment
- Could not export working web or mobile applications without additional development
Jitsu
- Jitsu is a pipeline, not a customer data platform, so identity resolution, audience building and reverse ETL are absent and a marketing team expecting Segment parity will be disappointed
- Connector sync frequency is deliberately tiered, with the free plan limited to manual runs and one daily sync, so anything approaching operational freshness requires the paid plan or self-hosting
- Self-hosting means you own the reliability of a system that drops data silently when misconfigured, and event loss is uniquely hard to notice because nothing errors, the numbers are just quietly lower
- The connector catalogue is far smaller than Fivetran or Airbyte, so if your requirement is pulling from many SaaS sources rather than pushing events, Jitsu is the wrong half of the problem
- It is a small company with a small commercial team, so enterprise procurement processes around security review, contractual SLAs and support escalation take longer than with an incumbent vendor
Pricing, plan by plan
InVision
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the InVision review.
Jitsu
Free- Open SourceFree
- MIT licence
- Self-host on any cloud
- No usage limits
- Cloud FreeFree
- Unlimited captured events
- 200,000 active events per month
- Manual connector runs only
- Business$99/mo
- 2,000,000 active events per month
- $40 per additional million events
- Hourly connector sync frequency
- EnterpriseOn request
- Custom event volume
- One minute sync frequency
- Unlimited active syncs
Which should you pick?
Choose InVision if
- You need interactive prototypes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want design collaboration.
Choose Jitsu if
- You need event collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Self-hosted, iOS, Android.
- You also want warehouse destinations.
Questions people ask
- Is InVision or Jitsu better?
- Neither clearly leads. InVision starts at Free and Jitsu at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, InVision or Jitsu?
- InVision starts at Free and Jitsu at Free.
- Does InVision or Jitsu run on more platforms?
- InVision runs on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android. Jitsu runs on Web, Linux, Self-hosted, iOS, Android.
- Can I use InVision for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is InVision best used for?
- InVision is most often used for prototype creation, design feedback, whiteboarding sessions, design handoff. Of those, prototype creation and design feedback are not what Jitsu is typically brought in for.
- What can InVision do that Jitsu cannot?
- InVision covers Interactive prototypes, Design collaboration, Freehand whiteboarding, Design system manager. Jitsu covers Event collection, Warehouse destinations, Connector syncs, Transformations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
InVision: Is InVision still active and supported in 2026?
No. InVision announced discontinuation of all services by end of 2024. The platform is no longer available or supported.
SourceJitsu: Is Jitsu the same as Jitsi?
No. Jitsu is an open source event data pipeline. Jitsi is an unrelated video conferencing project.
InVision: What were InVision's core features?
InVision allowed designers to transform designs into interactive prototypes and mockups for web and mobile. It supported Craft Player for Sketch, Craft Sync for Photoshop, and preview mode in Studio, enabling design-to-prototype workflows.
SourceJitsu: Can I self-host for free?
Yes. The project is MIT licensed with no usage limits when self-hosted.
InVision: What were InVision's pricing plans?
InVision offered Free ($0), Starter ($25/month), Professional ($99/month), and Team plans. Annual billing provided a 10% discount. Free plan included basic prototyping; paid plans added collaboration and file access.
SourceJitsu: How does the cost compare with Segment?
The Business plan is 99 US dollars a month for two million active events, where a per-tracked-user CDP typically costs orders of magnitude more at comparable volume.
InVision: Why did InVision fail in the market?
InVision's market position was disrupted by Figma, which unified design, prototyping, and collaboration in a single web-based platform. InVision required switching between design software and prototyping, creating friction and reducing competitiveness.
SourceJitsu: Does Jitsu do identity resolution?
No. It transports and transforms events; identity stitching and audiences are not part of the product.
InVision: What integrations did InVision support?
InVision integrated with design tools like Sketch and Photoshop, and supported sharing and collaboration workflows. The platform did not support deployment or direct development integration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- InVision vs Figma
- InVision vs Adobe XD
- InVision vs Sketch
- InVision vs Proto.io
- InVision vs Framer
- InVision vs Maze
- InVision vs Marvel
- InVision vs ProtoPie
- InVision vs Origami Studio
- InVision vs Principle
- InVision vs Axure RP
- InVision vs Procreate
- InVision vs Inkscape
- InVision vs Krita
- InVision vs Linearity Curve
- InVision vs CorelDRAW Graphics Suite
- InVision vs Spline
- InVision vs Xara Designer Pro+
- InVision vs Atlantis
- InVision vs Visual Studio Code
- InVision vs Steampipe
- InVision vs Tilt
- InVision vs Frappe
- InVision vs Kubernetes
- InVision vs GNU Emacs
- InVision vs Penpot
- InVision vs Bazel
- InVision vs Eclipse IDE
- InVision vs GitHub
- InVision vs Pants Build
- InVision vs Turborepo
- InVision vs Yarn
- InVision vs Argo CD
- InVision vs Blacksmith
- InVision vs CLion
- InVision vs Coder
- Jitsu vs Figma
- Jitsu vs Adobe XD
- Jitsu vs Sketch
- Jitsu vs Proto.io
- Jitsu vs Framer
- Jitsu vs Maze
- Jitsu vs Marvel
- Jitsu vs ProtoPie
- Jitsu vs Origami Studio
- Jitsu vs Principle
- Jitsu vs Axure RP
- Jitsu vs Procreate
- Jitsu vs Inkscape
- Jitsu vs Krita
- Jitsu vs Linearity Curve
- Jitsu vs CorelDRAW Graphics Suite
- Jitsu vs Spline
- Jitsu vs Xara Designer Pro+
- Jitsu vs Atlantis
- Jitsu vs Visual Studio Code
- Jitsu vs Steampipe
- Jitsu vs Tilt
- Jitsu vs Frappe
- Jitsu vs Kubernetes
- Jitsu vs GNU Emacs
- Jitsu vs Penpot
- Jitsu vs Bazel
- Jitsu vs Eclipse IDE
- Jitsu vs GitHub
- Jitsu vs Pants Build
- Jitsu vs Turborepo
- Jitsu vs Yarn
- Jitsu vs Argo CD
- Jitsu vs Blacksmith
- Jitsu vs CLion
- Jitsu vs Coder

