Testing · head to head
Insomnia vs Umami

Insomnia
Testing
REST and GraphQL API client for development and testing
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Umami
Marketing
Open source, cookie-free web analytics you can self-host for the cost of a database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Insomnia git Sync on the free tier covers up to 3 users only; Umami there is no cohort analysis, retention curve, session replay or multi-touch attribution, so a marketing team that needs to justify channel spend will still buy a second tool and Umami becomes a supplementary dashboard.
- They diverge on capability: Insomnia covers REST API Client, Umami covers Cookie-free tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Insomnia and Umami actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Insomnia
- REST API Client
- GraphQL Support
- gRPC Support
- GitHub
- GitLab
- Slack
- Windows support
- MacOS support
Only in Umami
- Cookie-free tracking
- Self-hosting
- Small tracking script
- Custom events
- Funnels and goals
- Multi-site and teams
- Public dashboards
- API access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Insomnia
- Sending and debugging HTTP, GraphQL and gRPC requestsnot Umami
- Storing collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot Umami
- Mocking an API endpoint before it existsnot Umami
- Running collections in CI with the Inso CLInot Umami
- Environment management across staging and productionnot Umami
Umami
- A developer who wants traffic numbers on a personal or client site without adding a consent bannernot Insomnia
- An organisation whose legal or procurement team has ruled out sending visitor data to a US advertising companynot Insomnia
- A high-traffic site where hosted analytics priced by pageview band has become expensive and self-hosting removes the ceiling entirelynot Insomnia
- A team that wants analytics data in a database they already control so they can query and join it themselvesnot Insomnia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Insomnia
- Git Sync on the free tier covers up to 3 users only
- Mock servers are capped at 1,000 requests a month on free, then $10 per 25,000
- Role-based access control requires Pro at $12 per user per month
- SSO, SCIM and vault integrations are Enterprise only at $45 per user per month
- Working without an account is limited to the local-only Scratch Pad
Umami
- There is no cohort analysis, retention curve, session replay or multi-touch attribution, so a marketing team that needs to justify channel spend will still buy a second tool and Umami becomes a supplementary dashboard.
- Self-hosting is only free in licence terms; you own the database, the upgrades, the backups and the query performance at scale, and a busy site's events table grows quickly enough to need real attention.
- Because it stores no persistent identifier, it cannot follow a user across devices or sessions in any meaningful way, which makes returning-visitor and lifetime-value questions unanswerable by design rather than by omission.
- Cloud overage is billed per event beyond the plan allowance, so a traffic spike or a badly instrumented custom event can produce a bill materially above the $20 or $200 headline before anyone notices.
- It is maintained by a small team, so the pace of new capability is modest and enterprise expectations such as SSO, granular role permissions and formal support agreements are limited compared with commercial analytics vendors.
Pricing, plan by plan
Insomnia
Free- EssentialsFree
- unlimited Cloud/Local projects
- up to 3 users with Git Sync
- 1,000 mock server requests/month
- Pro$12/user/month
- unlimited users with Git Sync access
- unlimited organizations
- role-based access control
- Enterprise$45/user/month
- Kong Konnect integration
- SSO (SAML/OIDC)
- SCIM provisioning
Umami
Free- Self-hostedFree
- MIT licensed, no licence fee
- No event limit imposed by the software
- Unlimited websites and users
- Cloud HobbyFree
- Up to 100,000 events per month
- 3 websites
- 6 months data retention
- Cloud Pro$20/month
- Up to 1,000,000 events per month
- Unlimited websites
- Unlimited team members
- Cloud Business$200/month
- Up to 10,000,000 events per month
- All Pro features
- Higher volume overage rate
Which should you pick?
Choose Insomnia if
- You need rest api client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux, Web.
- You also want graphql support.
Choose Umami if
- You need cookie-free tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want self-hosting.
Questions people ask
- Is Insomnia or Umami better?
- Neither clearly leads. Insomnia starts at Free and Umami at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Insomnia or Umami?
- Insomnia starts at Free and Umami at Free.
- Does Insomnia or Umami run on more platforms?
- Insomnia runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux, Web. Umami runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use Insomnia for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Insomnia best used for?
- Insomnia is most often used for sending and debugging http, graphql and grpc requests, storing collections in git rather than a vendor cloud, mocking an api endpoint before it exists, running collections in ci with the inso cli. Of those, sending and debugging http, graphql and grpc requests and storing collections in git rather than a vendor cloud are not what Umami is typically brought in for.
- What can Insomnia do that Umami cannot?
- Insomnia covers REST API Client, GraphQL Support, gRPC Support, GitHub. Umami covers Cookie-free tracking, Self-hosting, Small tracking script, Custom events.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Insomnia: How much does Insomnia cost?
Insomnia offers a free Essentials plan. Pro plans cost $12 per user per month with annual billing offering 17% savings. Enterprise plans cost $45 per user per month with support for up to 50 users self-serve; contact sales for larger teams.
SourceUmami: Is Umami really free?
Self-hosted, yes; it is MIT licensed with no event cap. You pay for the server and database. Umami Cloud has a free tier at 100,000 events a month and paid tiers from $20.
Insomnia: Is there a free version of Insomnia?
Yes, the Essentials plan is free and includes unlimited Cloud and Local projects, Git Sync for up to 3 users, 1,000 mock server requests per month, Inso CLI, E2EE, custom linting, plugins, and AI features.
SourceUmami: Do I need a cookie consent banner?
For Umami analytics specifically, generally no, because it sets no cookies and stores no personal data. Other tags on your site may still require one.
Insomnia: What mock server request limits apply to Insomnia plans?
Essentials includes 1,000 mock server requests per month. Pro includes 10,000 requests per month. Enterprise includes unlimited mock server requests. Additional mock server requests beyond plan allowances cost $10 per 25,000 requests.
SourceUmami: Can it replace Google Analytics?
For traffic, referrers and event counts, yes. For attribution modelling, audiences and advertising integration, no.
Umami: What does it need to run?
A container and a PostgreSQL or MySQL database. Most people deploy it on infrastructure they already pay for.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Insomnia vs Playwright
- Insomnia vs GitHub Actions
- Insomnia vs BrowserStack
- Insomnia vs Cypress
- Insomnia vs CircleCI
- Insomnia vs BugHerd
- Insomnia vs Zephyr Scale
- Insomnia vs Testsigma
- Insomnia vs Kameleoon
- Insomnia vs Appium
- Insomnia vs Qase
- Insomnia vs Cucumber
- Insomnia vs Applitools
- Insomnia vs pytest
- Insomnia vs Vitest
- Insomnia vs Percy
- Insomnia vs Jest
- Insomnia vs Matomo
- Insomnia vs Plausible
- Insomnia vs Fathom Analytics
- Insomnia vs Mautic
- Insomnia vs Countly
- Insomnia vs Freshpaint
- Insomnia vs Simple Analytics
- Insomnia vs Attribution
- Insomnia vs CallRail
- Insomnia vs Microsoft Clarity
- Insomnia vs Octoboard
- Insomnia vs Onclusive
- Insomnia vs WebEngage
- Insomnia vs Woopra
- Insomnia vs Wunderkind
- Insomnia vs Whatagraph
- Insomnia vs MoEngage
- Insomnia vs Optimizely
- Umami vs Playwright
- Umami vs GitHub Actions
- Umami vs BrowserStack
- Umami vs Cypress
- Umami vs CircleCI
- Umami vs BugHerd
- Umami vs Zephyr Scale
- Umami vs Testsigma
- Umami vs Kameleoon
- Umami vs Appium
- Umami vs Qase
- Umami vs Cucumber
- Umami vs Applitools
- Umami vs pytest
- Umami vs Vitest
- Umami vs Percy
- Umami vs Jest
- Umami vs Matomo
- Umami vs Plausible
- Umami vs Fathom Analytics
- Umami vs Mautic
- Umami vs Countly
- Umami vs Freshpaint
- Umami vs Simple Analytics
- Umami vs Attribution
- Umami vs CallRail
- Umami vs Microsoft Clarity
- Umami vs Octoboard
- Umami vs Onclusive
- Umami vs WebEngage
- Umami vs Woopra
- Umami vs Wunderkind
- Umami vs Whatagraph
- Umami vs MoEngage
- Umami vs Optimizely
