Construction · head to head
InEight vs Kojo

Kojo
Construction
Materials procurement and inventory for speciality trade contractors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: InEight a wide set of separate modules, including Control, Contract, Estimate, Schedule, Document and Model, so a working setup means choosing several; Kojo benefits depend on distributors providing electronic catalogues and pricing, and a contractor whose main supplier will not participate is left keying quotes by hand.
- They diverge on capability: InEight covers Project controls, Kojo covers Field material requests.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which InEight and Kojo actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in InEight
- Project controls
- Planning and scheduling
- Risk management
- Financial reporting
- Document management
- Oracle EBS
- SAP
- Procore
Only in Kojo
- Field material requests
- Multi-supplier quoting
- Purchase order management
- Inventory and warehouse
- Committed cost visibility
- Enterprise resource planning integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
InEight
- Cost control and forecasting on large capital projectsnot Kojo
- Estimating and bid preparationnot Kojo
- Contract and change order managementnot Kojo
- Field progress and completions trackingnot Kojo
- Document control across an engineering projectnot Kojo
Kojo
- An electrical or mechanical contractor where materials are close to half of job cost and buying happens dailynot InEight
- A trade contractor that cannot see committed material cost against a job until the invoice arrivesnot InEight
- A contractor consolidating purchasing across branches to negotiate better distributor pricingnot InEight
- A subcontractor tracking warehouse stock and job transfers that currently live in a spreadsheetnot InEight
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
InEight
- A wide set of separate modules, including Control, Contract, Estimate, Schedule, Document and Model, so a working setup means choosing several
- Prices are not published; enterprise deals are custom and per-user purchasing goes through a separate portal
- Built for capital projects in construction, energy and mining rather than general project work
Kojo
- Benefits depend on distributors providing electronic catalogues and pricing, and a contractor whose main supplier will not participate is left keying quotes by hand.
- It serves speciality trade contractors; general contractors procure subcontracts rather than materials and get almost nothing from it.
- Enterprise resource planning integration quality varies by system and version, so confirm the depth for your exact configuration rather than accepting the logo on the website.
- Field adoption is the whole game, and foremen who lose signal in a plant room or basement revert to phoning the office within days unless offline capture genuinely works.
- It changes purchasing process as well as software, so contractors whose buying authority is informal have to formalise who can commit money before the system produces clean data.
Pricing, plan by plan
InEight
$1000/month- Professional$1000/month
- Project controls
- Planning
- Risk management
- EnterpriseFree
- Advanced analytics
- Custom workflows
- Multi-project support
Kojo
On request- Kojo$undefined/year
- Materials procurement workflow
- Supplier quoting and purchase orders
- Inventory tracking
Which should you pick?
Choose InEight if
- You need project controls.
- You work on Web, Windows.
- You also want planning and scheduling.
Choose Kojo if
- You need field material requests.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want multi-supplier quoting.
Questions people ask
- Is InEight or Kojo better?
- Neither clearly leads. InEight starts at $1000/month and Kojo at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, InEight or Kojo?
- InEight starts at $1000/month and Kojo at On request.
- Does InEight or Kojo run on more platforms?
- InEight runs on Web, Windows. Kojo runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is InEight best used for?
- InEight is most often used for cost control and forecasting on large capital projects, estimating and bid preparation, contract and change order management, field progress and completions tracking. Of those, cost control and forecasting on large capital projects and estimating and bid preparation are not what Kojo is typically brought in for.
- What can InEight do that Kojo cannot?
- InEight covers Project controls, Planning and scheduling, Risk management, Financial reporting. Kojo covers Field material requests, Multi-supplier quoting, Purchase order management, Inventory and warehouse.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
InEight: How much does InEight cost?
InEight pricing is not published online. Enterprise pricing is determined through consultation with the sales team based on number of users, products selected, and contract length. Per-user pricing for the InEight NOW product allows monthly and annual billing options, but exact figures require contacting sales.
SourceKojo: Is this for general contractors?
No. It is built for speciality trade contractors buying materials. General contractors procure subcontracts and would get little from it.
InEight: Does InEight offer a free trial?
InEight offers modular and configurable pricing based on which products customers select. The brief mentions customers can request a demo to discuss pricing, but no specific free trial details are published.
SourceKojo: What if our suppliers will not connect?
You lose most of the quoting benefit and keep only the internal workflow. Check distributor participation before purchase, because it determines the return.
Kojo: Does it work without signal on site?
Field requests are designed for site use, and offline behaviour should be tested with your own crews in your worst locations, because that is where adoption is won or lost.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- InEight vs Procore
- InEight vs SketchUp
- InEight vs ArchiCAD
- InEight vs Autodesk Revit
- InEight vs HCSS
- InEight vs Openspace
- InEight vs Document Crunch
- InEight vs Egnyte
- InEight vs e-Builder
- InEight vs Smartsheet Construction
- InEight vs Sitemark
- InEight vs Skydio Dock for X10
- InEight vs Togal.AI
- InEight vs Topcon MAGNET
- InEight vs Trunk Tools
- InEight vs Trimble
- InEight vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- InEight vs Tekla Structures
- InEight vs Foundation Software
- InEight vs Knowify
- InEight vs Siteline
- InEight vs Assignar
- InEight vs Clearstory
- InEight vs GCPay
- InEight vs ConstructConnect
- InEight vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- InEight vs Bridgit Bravo
- InEight vs Trimble Pay
- InEight vs HammerTech
- InEight vs Handoff
- InEight vs HCSS HeavyBid
- InEight vs Houzz Pro
- InEight vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- InEight vs JobTread
- Kojo vs Procore
- Kojo vs SketchUp
- Kojo vs ArchiCAD
- Kojo vs Autodesk Revit
- Kojo vs HCSS
- Kojo vs Openspace
- Kojo vs Document Crunch
- Kojo vs Egnyte
- Kojo vs e-Builder
- Kojo vs Smartsheet Construction
- Kojo vs Sitemark
- Kojo vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Kojo vs Togal.AI
- Kojo vs Topcon MAGNET
- Kojo vs Trunk Tools
- Kojo vs Trimble
- Kojo vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- Kojo vs Tekla Structures
- Kojo vs Foundation Software
- Kojo vs Knowify
- Kojo vs Siteline
- Kojo vs Assignar
- Kojo vs Clearstory
- Kojo vs GCPay
- Kojo vs ConstructConnect
- Kojo vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Kojo vs Bridgit Bravo
- Kojo vs Trimble Pay
- Kojo vs HammerTech
- Kojo vs Handoff
- Kojo vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Kojo vs Houzz Pro
- Kojo vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Kojo vs JobTread

