Legal · head to head
Didomi vs iManage

Didomi
Legal
Google-certified and IAB TCF consent management across web, mobile and connected TV
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

iManage
Legal
Document and email management for law firms and professional services
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Didomi pricing is based on monthly unique visitors and is not published, so a large publisher cannot estimate cost before entering a sales process, and traffic spikes translate directly into billing surprises.; iManage it manages documents and email but not matters, billing or accounting, so it is an addition to a practice management system rather than a replacement for one.
- They diverge on capability: Didomi covers Google CMP certification, iManage covers iManage Work.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Didomi and iManage actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Didomi
- Google CMP certification
- IAB TCF support
- Connected TV and OTT
- Mobile SDKs
- Consent proof storage
- Preference centre
- Consent analytics
- Global privacy regimes
Only in iManage
- iManage Work
- Outlook email filing
- Security Policy Manager
- Records Manager
- Full text and metadata search
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Didomi
- A European publisher whose Google Ad Manager revenue is withheld without a Google-certified CMP integrated with Consent Modenot iManage
- A broadcaster collecting consent on connected TV apps, where certified CMP options are very limitednot iManage
- A multinational advertiser needing one consent signal honoured consistently across web, iOS and Android propertiesnot iManage
- A group that must produce consent evidence to a data protection authority following a complaintnot iManage
iManage
- Corporate firms whose matter record lives largely in email and must be filed and searchablenot Didomi
- Firms with client confidentiality obligations requiring need-to-know access per matternot Didomi
- Practices with records retention obligations spanning electronic and physical filesnot Didomi
- Financial services, accounting and government teams with the same matter-centric document problemnot Didomi
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Didomi
- Pricing is based on monthly unique visitors and is not published, so a large publisher cannot estimate cost before entering a sales process, and traffic spikes translate directly into billing surprises.
- Consent banners depress measurable traffic by design, and Didomi cannot prevent that, so publishers moving from a non-compliant banner should expect an immediate drop in tracked users and attributable conversions.
- Certification is a moving target: Google and IAB update requirements periodically and each version change forces integration work on your side, not only on the vendor's.
- Connected TV consent collection depends on the app platform and remote control interface, and implementations are considerably more involved than a web banner, often requiring per-platform development.
- The wider privacy suite beyond consent is thinner than dedicated privacy platforms, so an organisation needing data subject rights automation and data mapping usually buys a second vendor anyway.
iManage
- It manages documents and email but not matters, billing or accounting, so it is an addition to a practice management system rather than a replacement for one.
- Administration requires specialist skills, and organisations without a dedicated document management administrator tend to run it badly configured.
- Its value depends on fee earners filing email consistently, which is a behaviour change firms routinely fail to enforce.
- Nothing about pricing is published and the surrounding modules are licensed separately, so the gap between the core product and a working configuration is discovered late.
- The market-share figures it cites, such as 81 per cent of the Am Law 200, are vendor published and not independently audited.
Pricing, plan by plan
Didomi
On request- Didomi CMP$undefined/year
- Google-certified CMP for web, mobile and CTV
- IAB TCF registered
- Consent proof storage and analytics
iManage
On request- iManage Work$undefined/year
- Per user licensing quoted per organisation
- Cloud or on-premises deployment
- Security, records and analytics modules licensed separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Didomi if
- You need google cmp certification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Connected TV, API.
- You also want iab tcf support.
Choose iManage if
- You need imanage work.
- You work on Windows, Web, macOS, iOS, Android.
- You also want outlook email filing.
Questions people ask
- Is Didomi or iManage better?
- Neither clearly leads. Didomi starts at On request and iManage at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Didomi or iManage?
- Didomi starts at On request and iManage at On request.
- Does Didomi or iManage run on more platforms?
- Didomi runs on Web, iOS, Android, Connected TV, API. iManage runs on Windows, Web, macOS, iOS, Android.
- What is Didomi best used for?
- Didomi is most often used for a european publisher whose google ad manager revenue is withheld without a google-certified cmp integrated with consent mode, a broadcaster collecting consent on connected tv apps, where certified cmp options are very limited, a multinational advertiser needing one consent signal honoured consistently across web, ios and android properties, a group that must produce consent evidence to a data protection authority following a complaint. Of those, a european publisher whose google ad manager revenue is withheld without a google-certified cmp integrated with consent mode and a broadcaster collecting consent on connected tv apps, where certified cmp options are very limited are not what iManage is typically brought in for.
- What can Didomi do that iManage cannot?
- Didomi covers Google CMP certification, IAB TCF support, Connected TV and OTT, Mobile SDKs. iManage covers iManage Work, Outlook email filing, Security Policy Manager, Records Manager.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Didomi: Is Didomi Google-certified?
Yes, for web, mobile and connected TV, and the certification has been renewed across multiple years.
iManage: Does iManage replace practice management software?
No. It handles documents and email. Firms run it alongside a practice management and billing system such as Aderant or Elite 3E.
Didomi: Does it support IAB TCF?
Yes, it is a registered TCF CMP, currently supporting version 2.2 and later revisions.
iManage: Who owns iManage?
It has been independent since a management buyout from Hewlett-Packard completed in July 2015. Bain Capital Tech Opportunities made a minority growth investment in April 2023, with management retaining control.
Didomi: What does it cost?
Not published. Pricing is based on monthly unique visitors and quoted.
iManage: Is iManage worth it for a small firm?
It is sold to small firms as well as large ones, but the licensing and administrative overhead usually outweighs the benefit over a well organised document store below roughly twenty fee earners.
Didomi: Where is consent data stored?
Didomi is a French company and offers European storage, which matters for procurement teams weighing supervisory jurisdiction.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Didomi vs Cookiebot
- Didomi vs iubenda
- Didomi vs Secure Privacy
- Didomi vs Smokeball
- Didomi vs Westlaw
- Didomi vs Docketwise
- Didomi vs LexisNexis
- Didomi vs Luminance
- Didomi vs Rocket Matter
- Didomi vs Clio
- Didomi vs MyCase
- Didomi vs Ironclad
- Didomi vs Actionstep
- Didomi vs Aderant
- Didomi vs DISCO
- Didomi vs NetDocuments
- Didomi vs Relativity
- Didomi vs CASEpeer
- Didomi vs Tabs3
- Didomi vs Intapp
- Didomi vs Everlaw
- Didomi vs Spellbook
- Didomi vs CosmoLex
- Didomi vs Logikcull
- Didomi vs Harvey
- iManage vs Cookiebot
- iManage vs iubenda
- iManage vs Secure Privacy
- iManage vs Smokeball
- iManage vs Westlaw
- iManage vs Docketwise
- iManage vs LexisNexis
- iManage vs Luminance
- iManage vs Rocket Matter
- iManage vs Clio
- iManage vs MyCase
- iManage vs Ironclad
- iManage vs Actionstep
- iManage vs Aderant
- iManage vs DISCO
- iManage vs NetDocuments
- iManage vs Relativity
- iManage vs CASEpeer
- iManage vs Tabs3
- iManage vs Intapp
- iManage vs Everlaw
- iManage vs Spellbook
- iManage vs CosmoLex
- iManage vs Logikcull
- iManage vs Harvey
