Legal · head to head
Didomi vs Spellbook

Didomi
Legal
Google-certified and IAB TCF consent management across web, mobile and connected TV
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Spellbook
Legal
Contract drafting and review assistant inside Microsoft Word
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Didomi pricing is based on monthly unique visitors and is not published, so a large publisher cannot estimate cost before entering a sales process, and traffic spikes translate directly into billing surprises.; Spellbook it publishes no accuracy figure for its own output and no independent evaluation exists, so a firm must run its own assessment on real agreements.
- They diverge on capability: Didomi covers Google CMP certification, Spellbook covers Word add-in drafting.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Didomi and Spellbook actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Didomi
- Google CMP certification
- IAB TCF support
- Connected TV and OTT
- Mobile SDKs
- Consent proof storage
- Preference centre
- Consent analytics
- Global privacy regimes
Only in Spellbook
- Word add-in drafting
- Contract review
- Benchmarks against market standards
- Question answering
- Named model providers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Didomi
- A European publisher whose Google Ad Manager revenue is withheld without a Google-certified CMP integrated with Consent Modenot Spellbook
- A broadcaster collecting consent on connected TV apps, where certified CMP options are very limitednot Spellbook
- A multinational advertiser needing one consent signal honoured consistently across web, iOS and Android propertiesnot Spellbook
- A group that must produce consent evidence to a data protection authority following a complaintnot Spellbook
Spellbook
- Transactional lawyers drafting commercial agreements in Wordnot Didomi
- In-house teams reviewing inbound contracts without a contract lifecycle systemnot Didomi
- Lawyers who want a first pass at redlines before applying their own judgementnot Didomi
- Firms that need to know which model providers process their documents before adopting an AI toolnot Didomi
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Didomi
- Pricing is based on monthly unique visitors and is not published, so a large publisher cannot estimate cost before entering a sales process, and traffic spikes translate directly into billing surprises.
- Consent banners depress measurable traffic by design, and Didomi cannot prevent that, so publishers moving from a non-compliant banner should expect an immediate drop in tracked users and attributable conversions.
- Certification is a moving target: Google and IAB update requirements periodically and each version change forces integration work on your side, not only on the vendor's.
- Connected TV consent collection depends on the app platform and remote control interface, and implementations are considerably more involved than a web banner, often requiring per-platform development.
- The wider privacy suite beyond consent is thinner than dedicated privacy platforms, so an organisation needing data subject rights automation and data mapping usually buys a second vendor anyway.
Spellbook
- It publishes no accuracy figure for its own output and no independent evaluation exists, so a firm must run its own assessment on real agreements.
- The ten times more accurate claim originated in a funding announcement as a statement of intent and has no methodology, dataset or baseline behind it.
- Contract text is processed by third-party model providers, so despite the zero data retention agreements this still needs checking against client confidentiality terms and outside counsel guidelines.
- Pricing is not published, so seat cost cannot be compared against competitors without booking a demo.
- It is a drafting assistant rather than a contract lifecycle system, so it does nothing for execution, obligation tracking or renewals.
Pricing, plan by plan
Didomi
On request- Didomi CMP$undefined/year
- Google-certified CMP for web, mobile and CTV
- IAB TCF registered
- Consent proof storage and analytics
Spellbook
On request- Spellbook$undefined/year
- Priced by the number of seats on the licence
- Rates quoted after a demo, not published
- Seven day free trial, free access for academic use
Which should you pick?
Choose Didomi if
- You need google cmp certification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Connected TV, API.
- You also want iab tcf support.
Choose Spellbook if
- You need word add-in drafting.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Web.
- You also want contract review.
Questions people ask
- Is Didomi or Spellbook better?
- Neither clearly leads. Didomi starts at On request and Spellbook at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Didomi or Spellbook?
- Didomi starts at On request and Spellbook at On request.
- Does Didomi or Spellbook run on more platforms?
- Didomi runs on Web, iOS, Android, Connected TV, API. Spellbook runs on Windows, macOS, Web.
- What is Didomi best used for?
- Didomi is most often used for a european publisher whose google ad manager revenue is withheld without a google-certified cmp integrated with consent mode, a broadcaster collecting consent on connected tv apps, where certified cmp options are very limited, a multinational advertiser needing one consent signal honoured consistently across web, ios and android properties, a group that must produce consent evidence to a data protection authority following a complaint. Of those, a european publisher whose google ad manager revenue is withheld without a google-certified cmp integrated with consent mode and a broadcaster collecting consent on connected tv apps, where certified cmp options are very limited are not what Spellbook is typically brought in for.
- What can Didomi do that Spellbook cannot?
- Didomi covers Google CMP certification, IAB TCF support, Connected TV and OTT, Mobile SDKs. Spellbook covers Word add-in drafting, Contract review, Benchmarks against market standards, Question answering.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Didomi: Is Didomi Google-certified?
Yes, for web, mobile and connected TV, and the certification has been renewed across multiple years.
Spellbook: Is Spellbook's accuracy independently verified?
No. It publishes no accuracy figure of its own, and no third-party evaluation has been published. It did not participate in the Vals Legal AI Report, the main independent lawyer-baselined benchmark. Evaluate it on your own agreements during the trial.
Didomi: Does it support IAB TCF?
Yes, it is a registered TCF CMP, currently supporting version 2.2 and later revisions.
Spellbook: Which models does it use and where does our text go?
Spellbook names OpenAI GPT-5 and Anthropic Claude models, and states it has zero data retention agreements with both providers. Confirm the current terms and subprocessor list against your client confidentiality obligations before use.
Didomi: What does it cost?
Not published. Pricing is based on monthly unique visitors and quoted.
Spellbook: What does it cost?
Pricing is per seat but is not published. The vendor quotes it after a demo, so the seat rate cannot be compared with competitors in advance.
Didomi: Where is consent data stored?
Didomi is a French company and offers European storage, which matters for procurement teams weighing supervisory jurisdiction.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Didomi vs Cookiebot
- Didomi vs iubenda
- Didomi vs Secure Privacy
- Didomi vs Smokeball
- Didomi vs Westlaw
- Didomi vs Docketwise
- Didomi vs LexisNexis
- Didomi vs Luminance
- Didomi vs Rocket Matter
- Didomi vs Clio
- Didomi vs MyCase
- Didomi vs Ironclad
- Didomi vs Actionstep
- Didomi vs Aderant
- Didomi vs DISCO
- Didomi vs iManage
- Didomi vs Harvey
- Didomi vs Litera
- Didomi vs Everlaw
- Didomi vs CosmoLex
- Didomi vs Filevine
- Didomi vs Intapp
- Didomi vs Litify
- Didomi vs Tabs3
- Spellbook vs Cookiebot
- Spellbook vs iubenda
- Spellbook vs Secure Privacy
- Spellbook vs Smokeball
- Spellbook vs Westlaw
- Spellbook vs Docketwise
- Spellbook vs LexisNexis
- Spellbook vs Luminance
- Spellbook vs Rocket Matter
- Spellbook vs Clio
- Spellbook vs MyCase
- Spellbook vs Ironclad
- Spellbook vs Actionstep
- Spellbook vs Aderant
- Spellbook vs DISCO
- Spellbook vs iManage
- Spellbook vs Harvey
- Spellbook vs Litera
- Spellbook vs Everlaw
- Spellbook vs CosmoLex
- Spellbook vs Filevine
- Spellbook vs Intapp
- Spellbook vs Litify
- Spellbook vs Tabs3
