Mining · head to head
MineSched vs Seequent Central

MineSched
Mining
Production scheduling software for mining operations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Seequent Central
Mining
Collaborative platform for subsurface data management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: MineSched 3ds.com's MineSched page describes the product's scheduling features in detail but publishes no pricing, no named edition or tier, and no figure of any kind; Seequent Central cloud hosted on Microsoft Azure and requires an internet connection, with no offline or self-hosted option
- They diverge on capability: MineSched covers Production scheduling, Seequent Central covers Version control.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which MineSched and Seequent Central actually diverge.
| Attribute | MineSched | Seequent Central |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Cloud, Windows |
| Founded | 1981 | 2004 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in MineSched
- Production scheduling
- Activity sequencing
- Resource planning
- Constraint handling
- Scenario analysis
- Surpac
- Whittle
- PCBC
Only in Seequent Central
- Version control
- Model publishing
- Data management
- Audit trails
- Secure sharing
- Leapfrog Geo
- Leapfrog Works
- Oasis montaj
Both cover
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
MineSched
- Production planningnot Seequent Central
- Resource schedulingnot Seequent Central
- Equipment allocationnot Seequent Central
- Capacity planningnot Seequent Central
- Performance trackingnot Seequent Central
Seequent Central
- Centralised version control and audit trails for geological modelsnot MineSched
- Shared 3D visualisation of Leapfrog and Oasis montaj models across distributed teamsnot MineSched
- Project branching for scenario modellingnot MineSched
- Mining exploration and geothermal project coordinationnot MineSched
- Civil engineering and environmental projects needing a single model of recordnot MineSched
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
MineSched
- 3ds.com's MineSched page describes the product's scheduling features in detail but publishes no pricing, no named edition or tier, and no figure of any kind
Seequent Central
- Cloud hosted on Microsoft Azure and requires an internet connection, with no offline or self-hosted option
- Hosting instances start at a minimum 500GB of storage, with more sold as an add-on
- Billing splits into three separate lines: cloud hosting per organisation, user subscriptions per person and Leapfrog Connector licences per modeller
- Publishing models from Leapfrog into Central requires a separate Leapfrog Connector licence
- Value depends on already owning other Seequent tools such as Leapfrog, GeoStudio, PLAXIS or Oasis montaj
Pricing, plan by plan
MineSched
On request- MineSched Standard$12000/year
- Production scheduling
- Gantt charts
- Resource allocation
- MineSched Advanced$20000/year
- Multi-scenario planning
- Optimization tools
- Advanced constraints
Seequent Central
On request- Central Team$5000/year
- Version control
- 5 users included
- 100GB storage
- Central Professional$12000/year
- All Team features
- 25 users included
- 500GB storage
- Central EnterpriseFree
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited storage
- SSO integration
Which should you pick?
Choose MineSched if
- You need production scheduling.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want activity sequencing.
Choose Seequent Central if
- You need version control.
- You work on Cloud, Windows.
- You also want model publishing.
Questions people ask
- Is MineSched or Seequent Central better?
- Neither clearly leads. MineSched starts at On request and Seequent Central at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, MineSched or Seequent Central?
- MineSched starts at On request and Seequent Central at On request.
- Does MineSched or Seequent Central run on more platforms?
- MineSched runs on Windows. Seequent Central runs on Cloud, Windows.
- What is MineSched best used for?
- MineSched is most often used for production planning, resource scheduling, equipment allocation, capacity planning. Of those, production planning and resource scheduling are not what Seequent Central is typically brought in for.
- What can MineSched do that Seequent Central cannot?
- MineSched covers Production scheduling, Activity sequencing, Resource planning, Constraint handling. Seequent Central covers Version control, Model publishing, Data management, Audit trails. Both handle Windows support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
MineSched: Does GEOVIA MineSched publish pricing online?
No pricing information is available on the product page. Interested customers must contact Dassault Systèmes directly through their contact form or sales team to request pricing details.
SourceSeequent Central: How much does Seequent Central cost?
Pricing is not published on the Seequent website. For information about Central pricing and purchase, customers must contact Seequent's sales team directly.
SourceSeequent Central: What is the subscription model for Seequent Central?
Seequent Central uses a tiered subscription approach requiring one cloud hosting instance per organization (minimum 500GB storage on Microsoft Azure), one user subscription per person accessing Central, and one Leapfrog Connector per user modeling in Leapfrog.
SourceSeequent Central: Are there add-on options for Seequent Central?
Yes, an Advanced Bundle add-on is available for active Central subscribers, which includes web portal, data collection, and data entry tools.
SourceRelated pages
More on Seequent Central
Other head to heads
- MineSched vs Deswik Suite
- MineSched vs Caterpillar MineStar
- MineSched vs Leapfrog Geo
- MineSched vs MineRP
- MineSched vs K-MINE
- MineSched vs RPMGlobal XPAC
- MineSched vs Vulcan
- MineSched vs Minemax Planner
- MineSched vs MineSight
- MineSched vs Datamine
- MineSched vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- MineSched vs Trimble Mining
- MineSched vs PLAXIS
- MineSched vs RS2
- MineSched vs Snowden Supervisor
- MineSched vs RPMGlobal TALPAC
- MineSched vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- MineSched vs Maxwell Datacloud
- MineSched vs acQuire GIM Suite
- MineSched vs Cority EHS
- MineSched vs Geoscience ANALYST
- MineSched vs EQuIS Enterprise
- MineSched vs CorePlan
- MineSched vs IHS Markit Petra
- MineSched vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- MineSched vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- MineSched vs MinePlan
- Seequent Central vs Deswik Suite
- Seequent Central vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Seequent Central vs Leapfrog Geo
- Seequent Central vs MineRP
- Seequent Central vs K-MINE
- Seequent Central vs RPMGlobal XPAC
- Seequent Central vs Vulcan
- Seequent Central vs Minemax Planner
- Seequent Central vs MineSight
- Seequent Central vs Datamine
- Seequent Central vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Seequent Central vs Trimble Mining
- Seequent Central vs PLAXIS
- Seequent Central vs RS2
- Seequent Central vs Snowden Supervisor
- Seequent Central vs RPMGlobal TALPAC
- Seequent Central vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Seequent Central vs Maxwell Datacloud
- Seequent Central vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Seequent Central vs Cority EHS
- Seequent Central vs Geoscience ANALYST
- Seequent Central vs EQuIS Enterprise
- Seequent Central vs CorePlan
- Seequent Central vs IHS Markit Petra
- Seequent Central vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- Seequent Central vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- Seequent Central vs MinePlan
