Mining · head to head
Enablon EHS vs Seequent Central

Seequent Central
Mining
Collaborative platform for subsurface data management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Enablon EHS uK Find a Tender award notice records Enablon SAS awarded a 5 year contract by Cadent Gas Limited for its EHS management solution valued at £1,275,353.62 excluding VAT (£1,530,424.34 including VAT); this is a contract value, not a price list; Seequent Central cloud hosted on Microsoft Azure and requires an internet connection, with no offline or self-hosted option
- They diverge on capability: Enablon EHS covers Incident management, Seequent Central covers Version control.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Enablon EHS and Seequent Central actually diverge.
| Attribute | Enablon EHS | Seequent Central |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Windows, Ios, Android | Cloud, Windows |
| Founded | 1995 | 2004 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Enablon EHS
- Incident management
- Health and safety compliance
- Environmental management
- Risk assessment
- Audit management
- SAP
- Oracle
- Salesforce
Only in Seequent Central
- Version control
- Model publishing
- Data management
- Audit trails
- Secure sharing
- Leapfrog Geo
- Leapfrog Works
- Oasis montaj
Both cover
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Enablon EHS
- Health and safety managementnot Seequent Central
- Incident reportingnot Seequent Central
- Risk assessmentnot Seequent Central
- Compliance trackingnot Seequent Central
- Audit managementnot Seequent Central
Seequent Central
- Centralised version control and audit trails for geological modelsnot Enablon EHS
- Shared 3D visualisation of Leapfrog and Oasis montaj models across distributed teamsnot Enablon EHS
- Project branching for scenario modellingnot Enablon EHS
- Mining exploration and geothermal project coordinationnot Enablon EHS
- Civil engineering and environmental projects needing a single model of recordnot Enablon EHS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Enablon EHS
- UK Find a Tender award notice records Enablon SAS awarded a 5 year contract by Cadent Gas Limited for its EHS management solution valued at £1,275,353.62 excluding VAT (£1,530,424.34 including VAT); this is a contract value, not a price list
Seequent Central
- Cloud hosted on Microsoft Azure and requires an internet connection, with no offline or self-hosted option
- Hosting instances start at a minimum 500GB of storage, with more sold as an add-on
- Billing splits into three separate lines: cloud hosting per organisation, user subscriptions per person and Leapfrog Connector licences per modeller
- Publishing models from Leapfrog into Central requires a separate Leapfrog Connector licence
- Value depends on already owning other Seequent tools such as Leapfrog, GeoStudio, PLAXIS or Oasis montaj
Pricing, plan by plan
Enablon EHS
On request- Enablon EHS$25000/year
- Health and safety management
- Incident reporting
- Compliance tracking
- Enablon Enterprise$60000/year
- Advanced features
- Multi-site management
- Custom workflows
Seequent Central
On request- Central Team$5000/year
- Version control
- 5 users included
- 100GB storage
- Central Professional$12000/year
- All Team features
- 25 users included
- 500GB storage
- Central EnterpriseFree
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited storage
- SSO integration
Which should you pick?
Choose Enablon EHS if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, Windows, Ios, Android.
- You also want health and safety compliance.
Choose Seequent Central if
- You need version control.
- You work on Cloud, Windows.
- You also want model publishing.
Questions people ask
- Is Enablon EHS or Seequent Central better?
- Neither clearly leads. Enablon EHS starts at On request and Seequent Central at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Enablon EHS or Seequent Central?
- Enablon EHS starts at On request and Seequent Central at On request.
- Does Enablon EHS or Seequent Central run on more platforms?
- Enablon EHS runs on Web, Windows, Ios, Android. Seequent Central runs on Cloud, Windows.
- What is Enablon EHS best used for?
- Enablon EHS is most often used for health and safety management, incident reporting, risk assessment, compliance tracking. Of those, health and safety management and incident reporting are not what Seequent Central is typically brought in for.
- What can Enablon EHS do that Seequent Central cannot?
- Enablon EHS covers Incident management, Health and safety compliance, Environmental management, Risk assessment. Seequent Central covers Version control, Model publishing, Data management, Audit trails. Both handle Windows support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Seequent Central: How much does Seequent Central cost?
Pricing is not published on the Seequent website. For information about Central pricing and purchase, customers must contact Seequent's sales team directly.
SourceSeequent Central: What is the subscription model for Seequent Central?
Seequent Central uses a tiered subscription approach requiring one cloud hosting instance per organization (minimum 500GB storage on Microsoft Azure), one user subscription per person accessing Central, and one Leapfrog Connector per user modeling in Leapfrog.
SourceSeequent Central: Are there add-on options for Seequent Central?
Yes, an Advanced Bundle add-on is available for active Central subscribers, which includes web portal, data collection, and data entry tools.
SourceRelated pages
More on Enablon EHS
More on Seequent Central
Other head to heads
- Enablon EHS vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Enablon EHS vs Deswik Suite
- Enablon EHS vs Leapfrog Geo
- Enablon EHS vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Enablon EHS vs Cority EHS
- Enablon EHS vs Minviro
- Enablon EHS vs Envirosuite
- Enablon EHS vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Enablon EHS vs EQuIS Enterprise
- Enablon EHS vs Minemax Planner
- Enablon EHS vs MinePlan
- Enablon EHS vs PCBC
- Enablon EHS vs Fusion Mining
- Enablon EHS vs Geoscience ANALYST
- Enablon EHS vs GeoStudio
- Enablon EHS vs IHS Markit Petra
- Enablon EHS vs Infomine Mining Intelligence
- Enablon EHS vs GEOVIA GEMS
- Enablon EHS vs Maxwell Datacloud
- Enablon EHS vs CorePlan
- Enablon EHS vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- Enablon EHS vs Datamine
- Enablon EHS vs K-MINE
- Enablon EHS vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- Enablon EHS vs MineRP
- Seequent Central vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Seequent Central vs Deswik Suite
- Seequent Central vs Leapfrog Geo
- Seequent Central vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Seequent Central vs Cority EHS
- Seequent Central vs Minviro
- Seequent Central vs Envirosuite
- Seequent Central vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Seequent Central vs EQuIS Enterprise
- Seequent Central vs Minemax Planner
- Seequent Central vs MinePlan
- Seequent Central vs PCBC
- Seequent Central vs Fusion Mining
- Seequent Central vs Geoscience ANALYST
- Seequent Central vs GeoStudio
- Seequent Central vs IHS Markit Petra
- Seequent Central vs Infomine Mining Intelligence
- Seequent Central vs GEOVIA GEMS
- Seequent Central vs Maxwell Datacloud
- Seequent Central vs CorePlan
- Seequent Central vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- Seequent Central vs Datamine
- Seequent Central vs K-MINE
- Seequent Central vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- Seequent Central vs MineRP

