Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs Tuta

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Tuta
Cybersecurity
Secure, green and ad-free. Email to feel good about.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Tuta has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; Tuta individual plan pricing only shown in EUR; no USD conversion provided on site
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and Tuta actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | Tuta |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web |
| Founded | 1911 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in Tuta
Nothing recorded that IBM QRadar does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Tuta
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Tuta
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Tuta
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Tuta
Tuta
- Private encrypted email communicationnot IBM QRadar
- Users valuing end-to-end encryption and zero-knowledge architecturenot IBM QRadar
- Individuals seeking open-source email clientsnot IBM QRadar
- Organizations requiring quantum-resistant encryptionnot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Tuta
- Individual plan pricing only shown in EUR; no USD conversion provided on site
- Family plan pricing separate (EUR 3 or EUR 8 per additional user) not included in main pricing
- Shared mailboxes require additional EUR 3-8 monthly charges
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Tuta
Free- Free PlanFree
- 1 GB storage
- 1 calendar
- 3 labels
- Revolutionary Plan$3/month
- 20 GB storage
- 15 email aliases
- 3 custom domains
- Legend Plan$8/month
- 500 GB storage
- 30 email aliases
- 10 custom domains
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or Tuta better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and Tuta at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or Tuta?
- Tuta has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for IBM QRadar and Free for Tuta.
- Does IBM QRadar or Tuta run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. Tuta runs on Web.
- Can I use Tuta for free?
- Yes. Tuta has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IBM QRadar starts at On request.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what Tuta is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that Tuta cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Tuta: How much does Tuta email cost?
Tuta offers a free plan with 1 GB storage. Paid plans are EUR 3/month (Revolutionary) with 20 GB storage and 15 email aliases, and EUR 8/month (Legend) with 500 GB storage and 30 email aliases. Family plan add-ons cost EUR 3-8 per additional mailbox member monthly.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Tuta: Is there a free email plan with Tuta?
Yes, Tuta's free plan includes 1 GB of storage, one calendar, three labels, and full end-to-end encryption security features with no custom domains or email aliases.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
Tuta: What are the limits on Tuta's free email plan?
The free plan provides 1 GB storage, access to one calendar, three labels maximum, and no support for custom domains or additional email aliases.
SourceIBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Proton Mail
- IBM QRadar vs Brave Browser
- IBM QRadar vs OneTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Very Good Security
- IBM QRadar vs HashiCorp Vault
- IBM QRadar vs Cisco Duo
- IBM QRadar vs IDnow
- IBM QRadar vs Kaspersky Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs Mullvad VPN
- IBM QRadar vs Ory Kratos
- IBM QRadar vs OWASP ZAP
- IBM QRadar vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- IBM QRadar vs Passbolt
- IBM QRadar vs Ping Identity
- Tuta vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Tuta vs 1Password
- Tuta vs Norton 360
- Tuta vs LastPass
- Tuta vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Tuta vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Tuta vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Tuta vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Tuta vs Recorded Future
- Tuta vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Tuta vs Proofpoint
- Tuta vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Tuta vs Arnica
- Tuta vs Authelia
- Tuta vs Authy
- Tuta vs Baffle
- Tuta vs Beyond Identity
- Tuta vs BeyondTrust
- Tuta vs Proton Mail
- Tuta vs Brave Browser
- Tuta vs OneTrust
- Tuta vs Very Good Security
- Tuta vs HashiCorp Vault
- Tuta vs Cisco Duo
- Tuta vs IDnow
- Tuta vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Tuta vs Mullvad VPN
- Tuta vs Ory Kratos
- Tuta vs OWASP ZAP
- Tuta vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Tuta vs Passbolt
- Tuta vs Ping Identity
