Cybersecurity · head to head
Cisco Duo vs IBM QRadar

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Cisco Duo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cisco Duo free tier limited to 10 users maximum; IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cisco Duo and IBM QRadar actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cisco Duo | IBM QRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 1911 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cisco Duo
Nothing recorded that IBM QRadar does not also cover.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cisco Duo
- Eliminating phishing with passwordless authnot IBM QRadar
- Implementing zero trust with device trustnot IBM QRadar
- Protecting sessions from hijacking and theftnot IBM QRadar
- Managing compliance for regulated industriesnot IBM QRadar
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Cisco Duo
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Cisco Duo
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Cisco Duo
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Cisco Duo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cisco Duo
- Free tier limited to 10 users maximum
- Licenses must be purchased in 10-user increments (under 100 users) or 25-user increments (100+ users)
- Pricing is per-user per-month with minimum purchase increments
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cisco Duo
Free- FreeFree
- Multi-factor authentication (MFA)
- Seamless integrations
- Authenticator app
- Essentials$3/month
- All Free features
- Duo Directory
- Phishing-resistant MFA
- Advantage$6/month
- All Essentials features
- Identity intelligence
- Cisco Identity Intelligence (ISPM, ITDR)
- Premier$9/month
- All Advantage features
- Complete device trust
- VPN-less remote access
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Cisco Duo or IBM QRadar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cisco Duo starts at Free and IBM QRadar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cisco Duo or IBM QRadar?
- Cisco Duo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Cisco Duo and On request for IBM QRadar.
- Does Cisco Duo or IBM QRadar run on more platforms?
- Cisco Duo runs on Web. IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Cisco Duo for free?
- Yes. Cisco Duo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IBM QRadar starts at On request.
- What is Cisco Duo best used for?
- Cisco Duo is most often used for eliminating phishing with passwordless auth, implementing zero trust with device trust, protecting sessions from hijacking and theft, managing compliance for regulated industries. Of those, eliminating phishing with passwordless auth and implementing zero trust with device trust are not what IBM QRadar is typically brought in for.
- What can Cisco Duo do that IBM QRadar cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cisco Duo: How much does Cisco Duo cost?
Cisco Duo Free is $0/user/month (up to 10 users). Paid plans start at $3/user/month (Essentials), $6/user/month (Advantage), and $9/user/month (Premier). Billing is per-user per-month.
SourceIBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Cisco Duo: Is Cisco Duo free to try?
Yes, Duo Free offers multi-factor authentication and seamless integrations at $0/user/month for up to 10 users.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Cisco Duo: What is the minimum purchase for Cisco Duo?
Organizations must buy licenses in 10-user increments for under 100 users, or 25-user increments for 100 or more users. Plans are modifiable at any time.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
Cisco Duo: What does the Advantage plan add over Essentials?
Advantage ($6/user/month) adds identity intelligence, Cisco Identity Intelligence (ISPM, ITDR), Duo Passport, session theft protection, Active Directory Defense, and risk-based authentication.
SourceIBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cisco Duo vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Cisco Duo vs Beyond Identity
- Cisco Duo vs HID Global
- Cisco Duo vs 1Password
- Cisco Duo vs Norton 360
- Cisco Duo vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Cisco Duo vs LastPass
- Cisco Duo vs Authy
- Cisco Duo vs Stytch
- Cisco Duo vs Descope
- Cisco Duo vs Google Authenticator
- Cisco Duo vs Sardine
- Cisco Duo vs SentinelOne
- Cisco Duo vs Shufti Pro
- Cisco Duo vs Signicat
- Cisco Duo vs Silent Eight
- Cisco Duo vs Socket
- Cisco Duo vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Cisco Duo vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Cisco Duo vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Cisco Duo vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Cisco Duo vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Cisco Duo vs Recorded Future
- Cisco Duo vs Proofpoint
- Cisco Duo vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Cisco Duo vs Arnica
- Cisco Duo vs Authelia
- Cisco Duo vs Baffle
- Cisco Duo vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs HID Global
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Stytch
- IBM QRadar vs Descope
- IBM QRadar vs Google Authenticator
- IBM QRadar vs Sardine
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne
- IBM QRadar vs Shufti Pro
- IBM QRadar vs Signicat
- IBM QRadar vs Silent Eight
- IBM QRadar vs Socket
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust

