Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Cybersecurity
Cloud-native application protection platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud listed on UK G-Cloud at £147.54 per unit for Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud, via reseller Phoenix Software Limited, with the billing period not stated on the listing
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud covers Cloud Security Posture Management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1911 | 2005 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Cloud Security Posture Management
- Cloud Workload Protection
- Cloud Network Security
- Cloud Identity Security
- Code Security
- API Security
- Data Security
- Microsegmentation
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Cloud Securitynot IBM QRadar
- Cspmnot IBM QRadar
- Cwppnot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Listed on UK G-Cloud at £147.54 per unit for Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud, via reseller Phoenix Software Limited, with the billing period not stated on the listing
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
On request- Cloud SecurityFree
- CSPM
- CWPP
- CIEM
- Code SecurityFree
- IaC security
- SCA
- Secrets scanning
- Prisma Cloud EnterpriseFree
- Full platform
- API security
- Data security
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud if
- You need cloud security posture management.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want cloud workload protection.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud?
- IBM QRadar starts at On request and Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud at On request.
- Does IBM QRadar or Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud covers Cloud Security Posture Management, Cloud Workload Protection, Cloud Network Security, Cloud Identity Security.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud: How much does Prisma Cloud cost?
Prisma Cloud pricing is not published publicly. Pricing is provided through the sales team via a custom quote based on your deployment scope and requirements.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud: Is there a free trial for Prisma Cloud?
No free trial is available without contacting the sales team. The company offers a demo through the product demo center or by requesting a demo through their sales process.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud: What do I need to do to get Prisma Cloud pricing and start a trial?
You must contact the sales team via the Contact Us link or request a demo. Pricing details are provided only through direct sales engagement.
SourceIBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
More on Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Sysdig
- IBM QRadar vs Snyk
- IBM QRadar vs Aikido
- IBM QRadar vs Zscaler Internet Access
- IBM QRadar vs Semgrep
- IBM QRadar vs Veracode
- IBM QRadar vs Tenable
- IBM QRadar vs NICE Actimize
- IBM QRadar vs Spot AI
- IBM QRadar vs Syft
- IBM QRadar vs ThetaRay
- IBM QRadar vs Trivy
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs 1Password
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Norton 360
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs LastPass
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Recorded Future
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Proofpoint
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Arnica
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Authelia
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Authy
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Baffle
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Beyond Identity
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs BeyondTrust
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Sysdig
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Snyk
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Aikido
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Semgrep
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Veracode
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Tenable
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs NICE Actimize
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Spot AI
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Syft
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs ThetaRay
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Trivy
