AI Tools · head to head
Helicone vs Pulumi
Helicone
AI Tools
Open-source LLM observability and gateway platform for AI applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Pulumi
Cloud & Infrastructure
Modern infrastructure as code using programming languages
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Helicone the free Hobby plan is capped at 10,000 requests per month, which teams with production traffic can exceed quickly.; Pulumi the free Individual plan allows one user and one concurrent stack update
- They diverge on capability: Helicone covers Request dashboard and tracking, Pulumi covers Multi-language support.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Helicone and Pulumi actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Helicone
- Request dashboard and tracking
- Sessions and segments
- Helicone Query Language (HQL)
- Prompt datasets and improvement
- Playground
- Rate limits and alerts
Only in Pulumi
- Multi-language support
- Multi-cloud
- State management
- Secrets management
- RBAC
- Stacks
- Automation API
- Policy as Code
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Helicone
- Monitoring cost and latency of production LLM applicationsnot Pulumi
- Debugging multi-step agent sessionsnot Pulumi
- Managing and iterating on prompts across a teamnot Pulumi
- Routing requests across multiple LLM providersnot Pulumi
Pulumi
- Defining cloud infrastructure as code in TypeScript, Python, Go, C# or Java rather than a DSLnot Helicone
- Managing Pulumi state and secrets in a hosted backend instead of self-managed storagenot Helicone
- Policy, drift detection and deployment workflows for platform engineering teamsnot Helicone
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Helicone
- The free Hobby plan is capped at 10,000 requests per month, which teams with production traffic can exceed quickly.
- Advanced compliance features like SOC 2 and HIPAA are only available starting at the $799/month Team plan.
- Usage beyond the free tier is billed on top of the base subscription, adding cost unpredictability at scale.
- On-premises deployment is restricted to the custom Enterprise tier.
Pulumi
- The free Individual plan allows one user and one concurrent stack update
- The Team plan is $40 per month base including 40 credits, and caps the organisation at 10 users
- SAML/SSO, RBAC, audit logs and drift detection require the Enterprise plan at $400 per month base
- The per-resource rate rises from $0.1825 per resource per month on Team to $0.365 on Enterprise, so upgrading raises the unit price as well as the base fee
- Managed secrets are billed separately at $0.50 per secret per month on Team and $0.75 on Enterprise
- Self-hosting, SCIM user sync, audit log export and 24x7 support are only in Business Critical, which is custom priced with no published rate
- Team includes up to 500 resources and Enterprise up to 2,000, with everything beyond billed on demand as credits
Pricing, plan by plan
Helicone
Free- HobbyFree
- 10,000 free requests
- 1 GB storage
- 1 seat
- Pro$79/month
- 10K free requests included, usage-based beyond
- 7-day free trial
- Unlimited playgrounds and workspaces
- Team$799/month
- 5 organizations
- SOC 2 and HIPAA compliance
- Dedicated Slack channel access
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Custom MSAs and SAML SSO
- On-premises deployment
- Bulk cloud discounts
Pulumi
Free- Pulumi CommunityFree
- Open source
- Community support
- Self-hosted
- Pulumi Cloud$10/month
- Hosted backend
- Team collaboration
- RBAC
Which should you pick?
Choose Helicone if
- You need request dashboard and tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want sessions and segments.
Choose Pulumi if
- You need multi-language support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api.
- You also want multi-cloud.
Questions people ask
- Is Helicone or Pulumi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Helicone starts at Free and Pulumi at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Helicone or Pulumi?
- Helicone starts at Free and Pulumi at Free.
- Does Helicone or Pulumi run on more platforms?
- Helicone runs on web, api. Pulumi runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api.
- Can I use Helicone for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Helicone best used for?
- Helicone is most often used for monitoring cost and latency of production llm applications, debugging multi-step agent sessions, managing and iterating on prompts across a team, routing requests across multiple llm providers. Of those, monitoring cost and latency of production llm applications and debugging multi-step agent sessions are not what Pulumi is typically brought in for.
- What can Helicone do that Pulumi cannot?
- Helicone covers Request dashboard and tracking, Sessions and segments, Helicone Query Language (HQL), Prompt datasets and improvement. Pulumi covers Multi-language support, Multi-cloud, State management, Secrets management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Helicone: What does Helicone cost?
Helicone offers a free Hobby plan, a Pro plan at $79/month, a Team plan at $799/month, and custom Enterprise pricing, with usage-based charges applying beyond included request limits.
SourceHelicone: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
The free Hobby plan includes 10,000 requests per month, 1 GB of storage, 1 seat, and 1 organization, aimed at kickstarting AI projects.
SourceHelicone: Are there discounts available?
Helicone offers 50% off the first year for qualifying startups, discounts for non-profits, a $100 annual credit for open-source projects, and free access for students.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Helicone vs Pika
- Helicone vs Anthropic API
- Helicone vs D-ID
- Helicone vs Fathom
- Helicone vs Stable Diffusion
- Helicone vs Perplexity
- Helicone vs Arize AI
- Helicone vs Black Forest Labs
- Helicone vs Cartesia
- Helicone vs Deepgram
- Helicone vs Ideogram
- Helicone vs Jasper
- Helicone vs PromptLayer
- Helicone vs Resemble AI
- Helicone vs Together AI
- Helicone vs AI21 Labs
- Helicone vs Copy.ai
- Helicone vs HeyGen
- Helicone vs Grafana Cloud
- Helicone vs Neon
- Helicone vs DigitalOcean
- Helicone vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Helicone vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Helicone vs Fireworks AI
- Helicone vs Anyscale
- Helicone vs DeepInfra
- Helicone vs Deno Deploy
- Helicone vs Heroku
- Helicone vs Hetzner Cloud
- Helicone vs Linode
- Helicone vs Packer
- Helicone vs Render
- Helicone vs Upstash
- Helicone vs Vagrant
- Helicone vs Vultr
- Helicone vs Akamai
- Pulumi vs Pika
- Pulumi vs Anthropic API
- Pulumi vs D-ID
- Pulumi vs Fathom
- Pulumi vs Stable Diffusion
- Pulumi vs Perplexity
- Pulumi vs Arize AI
- Pulumi vs Black Forest Labs
- Pulumi vs Cartesia
- Pulumi vs Deepgram
- Pulumi vs Ideogram
- Pulumi vs Jasper
- Pulumi vs PromptLayer
- Pulumi vs Resemble AI
- Pulumi vs Together AI
- Pulumi vs AI21 Labs
- Pulumi vs Copy.ai
- Pulumi vs HeyGen
- Pulumi vs Grafana Cloud
- Pulumi vs Neon
- Pulumi vs DigitalOcean
- Pulumi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Pulumi vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Pulumi vs Fireworks AI
- Pulumi vs Anyscale
- Pulumi vs DeepInfra
- Pulumi vs Deno Deploy
- Pulumi vs Heroku
- Pulumi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Pulumi vs Linode
- Pulumi vs Packer
- Pulumi vs Render
- Pulumi vs Upstash
- Pulumi vs Vagrant
- Pulumi vs Vultr
- Pulumi vs Akamai
