Technology · head to head
Height vs Teamwork
Height
Technology
A project management tool from a small independent vendor that uses AI agents to handle routine ticket maintenance.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Teamwork
Professional Services
Project management software that lets you work your way
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Height it is one product from one small venture-funded company with no second line of business underwriting it, so adopting it as your system of record is a bet on that company's funding, and the tool holds work history you would have to reconstruct elsewhere if the bet fails.; Teamwork the free plan allows 5 users, 5 projects and 100 MB of file storage
- They diverge on capability: Height covers Autonomous triage, Teamwork covers Task management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Height and Teamwork actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Height
- Autonomous triage
- Duplicate detection
- Attribute maintenance
- Per-task chat
- Multiple views
- Developer integrations
- Custom fields and filters
- Public API
Only in Teamwork
- Task management
- Gantt charts
- Board view
- Time tracking
- Project templates
- Client management
- Invoicing
- Resource scheduling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Height
- A product or engineering team with no dedicated project manager, where backlog upkeep currently falls on whoever has timenot Teamwork
- Teams leaving Jira because its configuration and administration cost more attention than the tracking is worthnot Teamwork
- A support or intake queue where incoming requests need categorising and deduplicating before anyone can plan themnot Teamwork
- Startups that want tasks, chat and progress tracking in one tool rather than stitching a tracker to a chat appnot Teamwork
Teamwork
- Project and task management for client services teamsnot Height
- Tracking billable time, budgets and profitability against projectsnot Height
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Height
- It is one product from one small venture-funded company with no second line of business underwriting it, so adopting it as your system of record is a bet on that company's funding, and the tool holds work history you would have to reconstruct elsewhere if the bet fails.
- The 2024 relaunch as Height 2.0 reoriented the product around AI agents and changed workflows customers had already built on, which is the clearest available evidence of how much the product may be re-shaped again under you.
- The ecosystem is small next to Jira, Linear and Asana: fewer third-party integrations, no consultancy market, and far less written material to search when something behaves unexpectedly, so support questions go to the vendor and wait.
- The automation only pays off if tasks contain enough substance for a model to work with; on a team whose tickets are two-word titles, the agents have nothing to triage or deduplicate and the product reduces to an ordinary tracker at a premium.
- Task content is processed by hosted large language models, so a security review becomes a question about subprocessors and data handling, and there is no self-hosted or on-premises deployment to fall back on if the answer is unacceptable.
- There is no widely used two-way synchronisation with Jira, so an organisation where one team adopts Height and the rest stay on Jira ends up with two systems of record and manual reconciliation between them.
Teamwork
- The free plan allows 5 users, 5 projects and 100 MB of file storage
- Projects are capped even on paid plans, at 300 on Basics and 600 on Accelerate
- Automations are rationed by tier, at 100 on free, 20,000 on Accelerate and 100,000 on Optimize
- Single sign on is Enterprise only
- The two highest tiers publish no price at all
Pricing, plan by plan
Height
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Height review.
Teamwork
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 projects
- Max 5 users
- Task/list/board/Gantt views
- Basics$9.99/month
- Unlimited projects
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited templates
- Accelerate$24.99/month
- All Basics features
- Smart forms
- 20,000 automations
- Optimize$null/month
- Custom pricing
- Quoting
- 100,000 automations
Which should you pick?
Choose Height if
- You need autonomous triage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want duplicate detection.
Choose Teamwork if
- You need task management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Desktop, Api.
- You also want gantt charts.
Questions people ask
- Is Height or Teamwork better?
- Neither clearly leads. Height starts at Free and Teamwork at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Height or Teamwork?
- Height starts at Free and Teamwork at Free.
- Does Height or Teamwork run on more platforms?
- Height runs on Web. Teamwork runs on Web, Ios, Android, Desktop, Api.
- Can I use Height for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Height best used for?
- Height is most often used for a product or engineering team with no dedicated project manager, where backlog upkeep currently falls on whoever has time, teams leaving jira because its configuration and administration cost more attention than the tracking is worth, a support or intake queue where incoming requests need categorising and deduplicating before anyone can plan them, startups that want tasks, chat and progress tracking in one tool rather than stitching a tracker to a chat app. Of those, a product or engineering team with no dedicated project manager, where backlog upkeep currently falls on whoever has time and teams leaving jira because its configuration and administration cost more attention than the tracking is worth are not what Teamwork is typically brought in for.
- What can Height do that Teamwork cannot?
- Height covers Autonomous triage, Duplicate detection, Attribute maintenance, Per-task chat. Teamwork covers Task management, Gantt charts, Board view, Time tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Height: How is this different from Jira automation?
Jira automation is rule-based: you define a trigger and an action. Height's agents read the content of tasks and act on judgement, such as recognising that two tickets describe the same bug, which no rule can express.
Teamwork: What is the difference between Basics and Accelerate plans?
Basics ($9.99/user/month) includes time tracking and basic automations (100 limit). Accelerate ($24.99/user/month) adds smart forms, capacity planning, 20,000 automations, client invoicing, and integrations with HubSpot and QuickBooks.
SourceHeight: Can we self-host it?
No. It is software as a service only, with no on-premises or private-cloud deployment. If your requirements rule out a hosted tracker, this is not a candidate.
Teamwork: How much do I save with annual billing?
Annual subscriptions save 29% compared to monthly billing on paid plans. The Free plan is not affected.
SourceHeight: What happens to our data if the company fails?
You would need an export and a migration to another tool. This is the standard risk with a single-product startup, and it is worth confirming the export path covers task history, comments and custom fields before committing to it.
Teamwork: Is there a free trial available?
Yes, 14-day free trials are available for Basics and Accelerate plans. No credit card is required.
SourceHeight: Does it work for non-engineering teams?
Yes, the views and custom fields are generic enough for marketing, operations or support queues. Its integrations, though, are aimed at software teams, so a non-engineering team gets less of the surrounding value.
Height: Do the AI features need our tickets to be well written?
In practice, yes. Triage, deduplication and attribute maintenance work from what is written in the task, so the return is much higher on a team that already writes descriptive tickets than on one that does not.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Height vs Asana
- Height vs ClickUp
- Height vs Linear
- Height vs Monday.com
- Height vs Shortcut
- Height vs Coda
- Height vs Intercom
- Height vs Attio
- Height vs Jenkins
- Height vs Kubernetes
- Height vs Notion
- Height vs Figma
- Height vs Site24x7
- Height vs StatusCake
- Height vs Storybook
- Height vs WebStorm
- Height vs Zabbix Cloud
- Height vs Kantata
- Height vs Scoro
- Height vs Harvest
- Height vs FreshBooks
- Height vs Toggl Track
- Height vs Wave
- Height vs Accelo
- Height vs Certinia PSA
- Height vs Freelancer.com
- Height vs Function Point
- Height vs Bonsai
- Height vs TravelPerk
- Height vs BigTime
- Height vs Netsuite OpenAir
- Height vs Plutio
- Teamwork vs Asana
- Teamwork vs ClickUp
- Teamwork vs Linear
- Teamwork vs Monday.com
- Teamwork vs Shortcut
- Teamwork vs Coda
- Teamwork vs Intercom
- Teamwork vs Attio
- Teamwork vs Jenkins
- Teamwork vs Kubernetes
- Teamwork vs Notion
- Teamwork vs Figma
- Teamwork vs Site24x7
- Teamwork vs StatusCake
- Teamwork vs Storybook
- Teamwork vs WebStorm
- Teamwork vs Zabbix Cloud
- Teamwork vs Kantata
- Teamwork vs Scoro
- Teamwork vs Harvest
- Teamwork vs FreshBooks
- Teamwork vs Toggl Track
- Teamwork vs Wave
- Teamwork vs Accelo
- Teamwork vs Certinia PSA
- Teamwork vs Freelancer.com
- Teamwork vs Function Point
- Teamwork vs Bonsai
- Teamwork vs TravelPerk
- Teamwork vs BigTime
- Teamwork vs Netsuite OpenAir
- Teamwork vs Plutio
