Logging · head to head
Healthchecks vs Azure Monitor
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Healthchecks free tier limited to 20 jobs, restricting scale for small teams; Azure Monitor billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does
- They diverge on capability: Healthchecks covers Ping URL monitoring, Azure Monitor covers Log collection.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Healthchecks and Azure Monitor actually diverge.
| Attribute | Healthchecks | Azure Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per-job monitoring with fixed tiers | usage-based |
| Founded | 2015 | 2010 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, API), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Healthchecks
- Ping URL monitoring
- Customizable schedules
- Event logs
- Status badges
- Email alerts
- SMS and phone alerts
- Multiple integrations
Only in Azure Monitor
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
- Custom dashboards
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Healthchecks
- Monitoring cron jobs that run on schedulesnot Azure Monitor
- Alerting teams when background tasks failnot Azure Monitor
- Tracking Kubernetes CronJob execution healthnot Azure Monitor
- Monitoring Jenkins builds and deploymentsnot Azure Monitor
Azure Monitor
- Collecting logs and metrics from Azure resourcesnot Healthchecks
- Alerting on metric thresholds and log queriesnot Healthchecks
- Application performance monitoring through Application Insightsnot Healthchecks
- Long-term log retention for compliancenot Healthchecks
- Querying operational data with KQLnot Healthchecks
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Healthchecks
- Free tier limited to 20 jobs, restricting scale for small teams
- Requires explicit ping integration into each job
- No workflow orchestration or job scheduling capabilities
- SMS and phone credits consumed separately on paid plans
- Limited to ping-based detection without deep job introspection
Azure Monitor
- Billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does
- Only the first 5 GB a month of Analytics logs is free per billing account
- Retention beyond the base period is charged per GB per month, up to 2 years interactive and 12 years long term
- Log queries and search jobs are billed per GB scanned, so investigating an incident costs money
- Alert rules are billed per time series for metrics and by execution frequency for logs
- The pricing page shows placeholders rather than rates until a region and currency are chosen
Pricing, plan by plan
Healthchecks
Free- HobbyistFree
- Monitor 20 jobs
- 100 log entries per job
- Email alerts
- Supporter$5/month
- Monitor 20 jobs
- 100 log entries per job
- Support the service financially
- Business$20/month
- Monitor 100 jobs
- 1000 log entries per job
- 50 SMS and WhatsApp credits
- Business Plus$80/month
- Monitor 1000 jobs
- 1000 log entries per job
- 500 SMS and WhatsApp credits
Azure Monitor
Free- FreeFree
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
Which should you pick?
Choose Healthchecks if
- You need ping url monitoring.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want customizable schedules.
Choose Azure Monitor if
- You need log collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want metrics collection.
Questions people ask
- Is Healthchecks or Azure Monitor better?
- Neither clearly leads. Healthchecks starts at Free and Azure Monitor at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Healthchecks or Azure Monitor?
- Healthchecks starts at Free and Azure Monitor at Free.
- Does Healthchecks or Azure Monitor run on more platforms?
- Healthchecks runs on Web, API. Azure Monitor runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Healthchecks for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Healthchecks best used for?
- Healthchecks is most often used for monitoring cron jobs that run on schedules, alerting teams when background tasks fail, tracking kubernetes cronjob execution health, monitoring jenkins builds and deployments. Of those, monitoring cron jobs that run on schedules and alerting teams when background tasks fail are not what Azure Monitor is typically brought in for.
- What can Healthchecks do that Azure Monitor cannot?
- Healthchecks covers Ping URL monitoring, Customizable schedules, Event logs, Status badges. Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Metrics collection, Alerts and notifications, Custom dashboards.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Healthchecks: What does the free Hobbyist plan include?
The Hobbyist plan ($0/month) includes monitoring for 20 jobs, 100 log entries per job, and email alerts with no credit card required.
SourceAzure Monitor: How does Azure Monitor billing work?
Billing is based on data volume ingested into Azure Monitor. Additional charges apply separately for alerts, notifications, web tests, and data export. Activity log and platform metrics are automatically collected with an Azure subscription.
SourceHealthchecks: What is the difference between Business and Business Plus?
Business ($20/month) monitors 100 jobs with 50 SMS credits. Business Plus ($80/month) monitors 1000 jobs with 500 SMS credits and priority support.
SourceAzure Monitor: What savings are available with Azure Monitor?
Capacity reservations offer up to 36% savings compared to standard pay-as-you-go pricing when you commit to reserved capacity upfront.
SourceHealthchecks: Do nonprofits and open-source projects get special pricing?
Yes, open-source projects and nonprofits receive the Business plan at no cost.
SourceAzure Monitor: Is there a free tier for Azure Monitor?
No dedicated free tier exists. Activity log and platform metrics are automatically collected with an Azure subscription, but detailed monitoring requires additional configuration and associated costs.
SourceRelated pages
More on Healthchecks
More on Azure Monitor
Other head to heads
- Healthchecks vs Elastic Stack
- Healthchecks vs New Relic
- Healthchecks vs Datadog Logs
- Healthchecks vs Coralogix
- Healthchecks vs Grafana Loki
- Healthchecks vs incident.io
- Healthchecks vs Cronitor
- Healthchecks vs FireHydrant
- Healthchecks vs Openstatus
- Healthchecks vs Rootly
- Healthchecks vs Checkly
- Healthchecks vs CloudWatch
- Healthchecks vs Dynatrace
- Healthchecks vs InfluxDB
- Healthchecks vs Airbrake
- Healthchecks vs AppDynamics
- Healthchecks vs Axiom
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic Stack
- Azure Monitor vs New Relic
- Azure Monitor vs Datadog Logs
- Azure Monitor vs Coralogix
- Azure Monitor vs Grafana Loki
- Azure Monitor vs incident.io
- Azure Monitor vs Cronitor
- Azure Monitor vs FireHydrant
- Azure Monitor vs Openstatus
- Azure Monitor vs Rootly
- Azure Monitor vs Checkly
- Azure Monitor vs CloudWatch
- Azure Monitor vs Dynatrace
- Azure Monitor vs InfluxDB
- Azure Monitor vs Airbrake
- Azure Monitor vs AppDynamics
- Azure Monitor vs Axiom


