Developer Tools · head to head
HCP Terraform vs OWASP ZAP
HCP Terraform
Developer Tools
Infrastructure as code provisioning and management, formerly Terraform Cloud
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: HCP Terraform legacy free version deprecated; no current freemium tier; OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which HCP Terraform and OWASP ZAP actually diverge.
| Attribute | HCP Terraform | OWASP ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | free |
| Platforms | Web | Desktop, Cli, Api |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | Unknown | 2001 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in HCP Terraform
Nothing recorded that OWASP ZAP does not also cover.
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
HCP Terraform
- Infrastructure as Code managementnot OWASP ZAP
- Cloud resource provisioningnot OWASP ZAP
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot HCP Terraform
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot HCP Terraform
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot HCP Terraform
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot HCP Terraform
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
HCP Terraform
- Legacy free version deprecated; no current freemium tier
- New users receive $500 credit but still require usage to continue service
- Terraform Enterprise requires custom pricing
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Pricing, plan by plan
HCP Terraform
Free- Essentials$0.1/month
- Per resource pricing
- Remote state storage
- VCS connection
- Standard$0.47/month
- Per resource pricing
- Essentials features plus unlimited modules
- Module deprecation
- Premium$0.99/month
- Per resource pricing
- Standard features plus module revocation
- Waypoint actions
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
Which should you pick?
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Questions people ask
- Is HCP Terraform or OWASP ZAP better?
- Neither clearly leads. HCP Terraform starts at Free and OWASP ZAP at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, HCP Terraform or OWASP ZAP?
- HCP Terraform starts at Free and OWASP ZAP at Free.
- Does HCP Terraform or OWASP ZAP run on more platforms?
- HCP Terraform runs on Web. OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- Can I use HCP Terraform for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is HCP Terraform best used for?
- HCP Terraform is most often used for infrastructure as code management, cloud resource provisioning. Of those, infrastructure as code management and cloud resource provisioning are not what OWASP ZAP is typically brought in for.
- What can HCP Terraform do that OWASP ZAP cannot?
- OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
HCP Terraform: How much does HCP Terraform cost?
HCP Terraform uses per-resource pricing starting at $0.10/month/resource for Essentials, $0.47/month/resource for Standard, and $0.99/month/resource for Premium.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
HCP Terraform: Does HCP Terraform offer a free tier?
No, the legacy free version has been deprecated. However, new users receive $500 credit to try the service.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
HCP Terraform: What does the Standard plan include?
Standard plan at $0.47/month/resource includes unlimited modules, module deprecation, team notifications, no-code provisioning, and Waypoint templates.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
OWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
More on HCP Terraform
Other head to heads
- HCP Terraform vs Atlantis
- HCP Terraform vs Visual Studio Code
- HCP Terraform vs ESLint
- HCP Terraform vs pnpm
- HCP Terraform vs Turborepo
- HCP Terraform vs Harness
- HCP Terraform vs Octopus Deploy
- HCP Terraform vs Moonrepo
- HCP Terraform vs Ansible
- HCP Terraform vs Spacelift
- HCP Terraform vs Coder
- HCP Terraform vs Keycloak
- HCP Terraform vs Nx Cloud
- HCP Terraform vs Pants Build
- HCP Terraform vs Swagger UI
- HCP Terraform vs Yarn
- HCP Terraform vs 1Password
- HCP Terraform vs Bitdefender Total Security
- HCP Terraform vs Norton 360
- HCP Terraform vs LastPass
- HCP Terraform vs Bitwarden
- HCP Terraform vs Burp Suite
- HCP Terraform vs Metasploit
- HCP Terraform vs Wireshark
- HCP Terraform vs authentik
- HCP Terraform vs Authelia
- HCP Terraform vs Infisical
- HCP Terraform vs Trivy
- HCP Terraform vs Feedzai
- HCP Terraform vs Frontegg
- HCP Terraform vs HashiCorp Boundary
- HCP Terraform vs JumpCloud
- HCP Terraform vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs Atlantis
- OWASP ZAP vs Visual Studio Code
- OWASP ZAP vs ESLint
- OWASP ZAP vs pnpm
- OWASP ZAP vs Turborepo
- OWASP ZAP vs Harness
- OWASP ZAP vs Octopus Deploy
- OWASP ZAP vs Moonrepo
- OWASP ZAP vs Ansible
- OWASP ZAP vs Spacelift
- OWASP ZAP vs Coder
- OWASP ZAP vs Keycloak
- OWASP ZAP vs Nx Cloud
- OWASP ZAP vs Pants Build
- OWASP ZAP vs Swagger UI
- OWASP ZAP vs Yarn
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection