APIs · head to head
GraphQL Apollo vs Syft

Syft
Cybersecurity
Generates a software bill of materials from images, filesystems and archives
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing; Syft lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- They diverge on capability: GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Syft covers Multi-format output.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphQL Apollo and Syft actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphQL Apollo | Syft |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile | macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker |
| Category | APIs | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2016 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
Only in Syft
- Multi-format output
- Broad ecosystem coverage
- Binary classifiers
- In-toto attestations
- Library and CLI
- Pairs with Grype
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot Syft
- Schema federationnot Syft
- API analytics and monitoringnot Syft
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot Syft
Syft
- Producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires onenot GraphQL Apollo
- Feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directlynot GraphQL Apollo
- Recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quicklynot GraphQL Apollo
- Public sector work where an SBOM is a contractual deliverablenot GraphQL Apollo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
Syft
- Lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- Fidelity varies sharply by ecosystem. Conan for C and C++, Haskell and Terraform get cataloguer support with no licence data, no dependency relationships and no file ownership, so a C and C++ shop gets the least from it.
- Binary classification yields no licence or dependency metadata, and vendored or statically linked code is exactly where supply chain risk hides, so the blind spot and the risk overlap.
- Incorrect CPE values and CPE collisions are recorded as open issues, and since Grype matches on CPE and PURL, an inventory error becomes a false negative in the security report downstream.
- An inventory is not a risk assessment. Even a perfect bill of materials says a vulnerable version is present, never that the vulnerable function is called, and the triage burden lands entirely on the reader.
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
Syft
Free- SyftFree
- Apache-2.0
- No usage limits
- Community support
- Anchore Enterprise$undefined/year
- Policy enforcement and reporting
- Federal and commercial tiers
- Pricing not published, quoted on request
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Choose Syft if
- You need multi-format output.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want broad ecosystem coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphQL Apollo or Syft better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Syft at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphQL Apollo or Syft?
- GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Syft at Free.
- Does GraphQL Apollo or Syft run on more platforms?
- GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile. Syft runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use GraphQL Apollo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is GraphQL Apollo best used for?
- GraphQL Apollo is most often used for graphql api management, schema federation, api analytics and monitoring, developer-focused infrastructure. Of those, graphql api management and schema federation are not what Syft is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphQL Apollo do that Syft cannot?
- GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs. Syft covers Multi-format output, Broad ecosystem coverage, Binary classifiers, In-toto attestations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
SourceSyft: Does Syft find vulnerabilities?
No. It produces an inventory. Grype, from the same company, matches that inventory against vulnerability feeds. They are separate tools and the distinction is frequently lost.
GraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
SourceSyft: Does anything in the Anchore stack do reachability analysis?
No. Neither Syft, Grype nor the commercial Anchore platform performs call graph or reachability analysis, so none of them tells you whether a vulnerable code path is actually invoked.
GraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
SourceSyft: Is it a CNCF or OpenSSF project?
No. It is single-vendor open source owned by Anchore, with no foundation governance. That is a different licence risk profile from Sigstore.
Syft: What does Anchore Enterprise cost?
Not published. The pricing page is contact-sales only, with named but unpriced commercial and federal tiers.
Syft: How do I know my SBOM is complete?
You largely cannot, which is the honest answer. Silent partial parsing is a known open defect, so a bill of materials used for compliance should be spot-checked against a known dependency list.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs Cosign
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sigstore
- GraphQL Apollo vs Trivy
- GraphQL Apollo vs Chainguard
- GraphQL Apollo vs Metasploit
- GraphQL Apollo vs Wireshark
- GraphQL Apollo vs Semgrep
- GraphQL Apollo vs Legit Security
- GraphQL Apollo vs OWASP ZAP
- GraphQL Apollo vs HashiCorp Vault
- GraphQL Apollo vs Bitwarden
- GraphQL Apollo vs Infisical
- GraphQL Apollo vs Tenable Nessus
- GraphQL Apollo vs Transmit Security
- GraphQL Apollo vs TrustArc
- GraphQL Apollo vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- GraphQL Apollo vs VMware Carbon Black
- Syft vs Hasura
- Syft vs Appwrite
- Syft vs PocketBase
- Syft vs Sanity
- Syft vs Strapi
- Syft vs GraphQL Playground
- Syft vs Kong Gateway
- Syft vs Parse Server
- Syft vs WSO2 API Manager
- Syft vs Janus Gateway
- Syft vs Directus
- Syft vs KeystoneJS
- Syft vs Solaris
- Syft vs Stainless
- Syft vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Syft vs Thredd
- Syft vs Thunder Client
- Syft vs Cosign
- Syft vs Sigstore
- Syft vs Trivy
- Syft vs Chainguard
- Syft vs Metasploit
- Syft vs Wireshark
- Syft vs Semgrep
- Syft vs Legit Security
- Syft vs OWASP ZAP
- Syft vs HashiCorp Vault
- Syft vs Bitwarden
- Syft vs Infisical
- Syft vs Tenable Nessus
- Syft vs Transmit Security
- Syft vs TrustArc
- Syft vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Syft vs VMware Carbon Black

