APIs · head to head
GraphQL Apollo vs Maestro

Maestro
Mobile Development
Open source mobile UI testing with YAML flows, and a cloud priced per concurrent device rather than per test minute
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing; Maestro cloud pricing is per concurrent device at 250 USD per month, so the cost is driven by how quickly you need the suite to finish rather than by how much you test, and a team wanting a fast pull request gate buys several devices at once.
- They diverge on capability: GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Maestro covers YAML test flows.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphQL Apollo and Maestro actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphQL Apollo | Maestro |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Per concurrent cloud device per month |
| Platforms | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile | iOS, Android, Web, macOS, Linux, Windows |
| Category | APIs | Mobile Development |
| Founded | 2016 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
Only in Maestro
- YAML test flows
- Built-in flakiness tolerance
- Maestro Studio
- Open source CLI
- Cloud device runs
- CI and pull request integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot Maestro
- Schema federationnot Maestro
- API analytics and monitoringnot Maestro
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot Maestro
Maestro
- A mobile team replacing an Appium suite that spends more engineering time on maintenance than on new coveragenot GraphQL Apollo
- Running smoke tests on every pull request without buying and maintaining a physical device labnot GraphQL Apollo
- Letting a QA specialist who does not write application code author and own the end-to-end suitenot GraphQL Apollo
- Reproducing a reported bug by recording the exact flow in Studio and committing it as a regression testnot GraphQL Apollo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
Maestro
- Cloud pricing is per concurrent device at 250 USD per month, so the cost is driven by how quickly you need the suite to finish rather than by how much you test, and a team wanting a fast pull request gate buys several devices at once.
- YAML is deliberately limited, so tests with real conditional logic or data-driven permutations end up in embedded scripting blocks where the readability advantage that justified the format disappears.
- Maestro drives the app as a black box, so it cannot assert on internal state, mock a network layer from inside the process or inspect application memory the way an in-process framework can.
- The hosted device catalogue is narrower than dedicated device clouds, so testing against a long tail of specific manufacturer builds and older operating system versions still requires another provider.
- The project rebranded from mobile.dev to Maestro, so a share of existing tutorials, blog posts and links point at old domains and documentation that no longer match the current tooling.
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
Maestro
Free- LocalFree
- Free and open source CLI
- Maestro Studio, Viewer and MCP
- Runs on your own simulators, emulators and devices
- Cloud$250/month
- Per device per month
- Unlimited hosted test runs
- Hosted Android, iOS and web devices
- Enterprise Cloud$undefined/year
- Quoted
- SSO and dedicated support
- Custom contracts
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Choose Maestro if
- You need yaml test flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web, macOS, Linux, Windows.
- You also want built-in flakiness tolerance.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphQL Apollo or Maestro better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Maestro at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphQL Apollo or Maestro?
- GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Maestro at Free.
- Does GraphQL Apollo or Maestro run on more platforms?
- GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile. Maestro runs on iOS, Android, Web, macOS, Linux, Windows.
- Can I use GraphQL Apollo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is GraphQL Apollo best used for?
- GraphQL Apollo is most often used for graphql api management, schema federation, api analytics and monitoring, developer-focused infrastructure. Of those, graphql api management and schema federation are not what Maestro is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphQL Apollo do that Maestro cannot?
- GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs. Maestro covers YAML test flows, Built-in flakiness tolerance, Maestro Studio, Open source CLI.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
SourceMaestro: Is Maestro free?
The CLI, Studio and local execution are free and open source. The hosted device cloud is 250 USD per device per month.
GraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
SourceMaestro: What exactly does per device mean?
It is a concurrency slot. One device runs one test at a time, so suite duration is a function of how many devices you buy.
GraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
SourceMaestro: How does it compare with Appium?
Tests are YAML rather than code and flakiness handling is built in, which reduces maintenance, at the cost of lower-level control.
Maestro: Can it test web applications too?
Yes, the cloud offers hosted web devices alongside Android and iOS, though the product centre of gravity is mobile.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs Bitrise
- GraphQL Apollo vs Codemagic
- GraphQL Apollo vs Firebase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Expo
- GraphQL Apollo vs Xcode
- GraphQL Apollo vs Capacitor
- GraphQL Apollo vs AppsFlyer
- GraphQL Apollo vs Adapty
- GraphQL Apollo vs RevenueCat
- GraphQL Apollo vs .NET MAUI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Fastlane
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appcircle
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kotlin Multiplatform
- GraphQL Apollo vs Adjust
- GraphQL Apollo vs EAS Build
- GraphQL Apollo vs Ionic
- Maestro vs Hasura
- Maestro vs Appwrite
- Maestro vs PocketBase
- Maestro vs Sanity
- Maestro vs Strapi
- Maestro vs GraphQL Playground
- Maestro vs Kong Gateway
- Maestro vs Parse Server
- Maestro vs WSO2 API Manager
- Maestro vs Janus Gateway
- Maestro vs Directus
- Maestro vs KeystoneJS
- Maestro vs Solaris
- Maestro vs Stainless
- Maestro vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Maestro vs Thredd
- Maestro vs Thunder Client
- Maestro vs Bitrise
- Maestro vs Codemagic
- Maestro vs Firebase
- Maestro vs Expo
- Maestro vs Xcode
- Maestro vs Capacitor
- Maestro vs AppsFlyer
- Maestro vs Adapty
- Maestro vs RevenueCat
- Maestro vs .NET MAUI
- Maestro vs Fastlane
- Maestro vs Appcircle
- Maestro vs Kotlin Multiplatform
- Maestro vs Adjust
- Maestro vs EAS Build
- Maestro vs Ionic

