Manufacturing · head to head
GrabCAD Print vs Petasense

GrabCAD Print
Manufacturing
Stratasys print preparation, free in Standard form and 5,000 US dollars a year for Pro
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Petasense
Manufacturing
Wireless vibration and asset reliability monitoring, now owned by AssetWatch
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only GrabCAD Print has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GrabCAD Print it only drives Stratasys printers, so the free Standard tier is a hardware retention mechanism rather than a portable tool, and prepared jobs do not move to another vendor.; Petasense petasense is now owned by AssetWatch, whose business is monitoring delivered as a managed service, so a buyer wanting self-service software should get the delivery model written into the contract rather than assume it.
- They diverge on capability: GrabCAD Print covers Native CAD import, Petasense covers Vibration Mote.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GrabCAD Print and Petasense actually diverge.
| Attribute | GrabCAD Print | Petasense |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per year | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Windows, Desktop, Cloud | Web, Cloud, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GrabCAD Print
- Native CAD import
- Multi-technology support
- Tray arrangement and supports
- Nesting (Pro)
- Manufacturing templates (Pro)
- Part labelling (Pro)
- Wall thickness analysis (Pro)
- Cost estimation (Pro)
Only in Petasense
- Vibration Mote
- Transmitter range
- ARO cloud
- VFD-specific monitoring
- Reliability workflow
- Mixed wired and wireless
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GrabCAD Print
- A service bureau nesting many small parts into a single tray to raise volume utilisation and reduce cost per partnot Petasense
- A production department locking validated process parameters into a template so night shift operators cannot change themnot Petasense
- A design office running FDM and PolyJet machines and wanting one preparation tool rather than twonot Petasense
- An engineering team importing native CAD assemblies directly rather than maintaining an STL export workflownot Petasense
Petasense
- A reliability team wanting continuous vibration data on assets currently covered by a quarterly walkaround routenot GrabCAD Print
- A plant with variable frequency drive assets where generic vibration analytics produce too many false alarmsnot GrabCAD Print
- Mixing battery sensors on accessible pumps with wired sensors on the handful of assets that would stop productionnot GrabCAD Print
- A manufacturer with no in-house vibration analyst that wants the analysis delivered as a service rather than as a dashboardnot GrabCAD Print
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GrabCAD Print
- It only drives Stratasys printers, so the free Standard tier is a hardware retention mechanism rather than a portable tool, and prepared jobs do not move to another vendor.
- Pro is 5,000 US dollars per named user per year on top of machines that already cost six figures, and there is no floating licence in the standard offer, so shift-based teams buy multiple seats.
- The production features that most justify the spend, nesting and manufacturing templates, are all locked behind Pro, meaning the free tier is not viable for a bureau.
- Stratasys materials are proprietary and cartridge-locked, so the software sits on top of a consumables model where the recurring cost is set entirely by the vendor.
- Support and feature coverage vary by printer family; newer technologies such as SAF and the Neo SLA line have historically lagged FDM in the depth of preparation options exposed.
Petasense
- Petasense is now owned by AssetWatch, whose business is monitoring delivered as a managed service, so a buyer wanting self-service software should get the delivery model written into the contract rather than assume it.
- Hardware is required per measurement point and gateways are required per area, so the up-front capital for a plant-wide deployment is substantial and separate from the subscription.
- Per-asset subscription pricing scales linearly, which makes full coverage of a large population of low-value motors uneconomic compared with route-based monitoring.
- Nothing is published on sensor cost, subscription rate, gateway requirements or contract length, so a total cost of ownership figure requires a full sales engagement before you can compare it against anything.
- Battery-powered wireless sensors trade measurement richness for battery life, so the sampling rate and resolution are lower than a wired analyser would give, which limits diagnosis of high-frequency bearing defects on critical machines.
Pricing, plan by plan
GrabCAD Print
Free- GrabCAD Print StandardFree
- Free for Stratasys printer owners
- Native CAD import and tray arrangement
- Support generation and section tools
- GrabCAD Print Pro$5000/year
- Per named user per year
- Automated build nesting
- Manufacturing templates with locked process parameters
Petasense
On request- Petasense ARO$undefined/year
- Subscription priced per monitored asset
- Vibration Mote or Transmitter hardware required per measurement point
- Gateway hardware required for wireless deployments
Which should you pick?
Choose GrabCAD Print if
- You need native cad import.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Desktop, Cloud.
- You also want multi-technology support.
Choose Petasense if
- You need vibration mote.
- You work on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- You also want transmitter range.
Questions people ask
- Is GrabCAD Print or Petasense better?
- Neither clearly leads. GrabCAD Print starts at Free and Petasense at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GrabCAD Print or Petasense?
- GrabCAD Print has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for GrabCAD Print and On request for Petasense.
- Does GrabCAD Print or Petasense run on more platforms?
- GrabCAD Print runs on Windows, Desktop, Cloud. Petasense runs on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- Can I use GrabCAD Print for free?
- Yes. GrabCAD Print has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Petasense starts at On request.
- What is GrabCAD Print best used for?
- GrabCAD Print is most often used for a service bureau nesting many small parts into a single tray to raise volume utilisation and reduce cost per part, a production department locking validated process parameters into a template so night shift operators cannot change them, a design office running fdm and polyjet machines and wanting one preparation tool rather than two, an engineering team importing native cad assemblies directly rather than maintaining an stl export workflow. Of those, a service bureau nesting many small parts into a single tray to raise volume utilisation and reduce cost per part and a production department locking validated process parameters into a template so night shift operators cannot change them are not what Petasense is typically brought in for.
- What can GrabCAD Print do that Petasense cannot?
- GrabCAD Print covers Native CAD import, Multi-technology support, Tray arrangement and supports, Nesting (Pro). Petasense covers Vibration Mote, Transmitter range, ARO cloud, VFD-specific monitoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GrabCAD Print: Is GrabCAD Print free?
GrabCAD Print Standard is free for Stratasys printer owners. GrabCAD Print Pro is 5,000 US dollars per user per year.
Petasense: Is Petasense still a separate product?
Yes. It trades under its own name with its own product line, but the owner since January 2024 is AssetWatch.
GrabCAD Print: Can it drive a non-Stratasys printer?
No. It is tied to Stratasys hardware.
Petasense: Do I have to buy Petasense hardware?
Yes. The platform is built around its own Motes and Transmitters; it is not a bring-your-own-sensor analytics product.
GrabCAD Print: What do I actually get for the Pro fee?
Nesting, manufacturing templates, part labelling, wall thickness analysis and build cost estimation. These are production rather than prototyping features.
Petasense: Can I get monitoring as a service?
Yes, through parent AssetWatch, whose model is condition monitoring engineers reviewing your data. Clarify which model your quote covers.
GrabCAD Print: Is there a trial?
Yes, Stratasys has offered 30 and 60 day trials of Pro.
Petasense: How is it priced?
Per monitored asset on subscription, plus sensors and gateways. Nothing is published.
Related pages
More on GrabCAD Print
Other head to heads
- GrabCAD Print vs Fusion 360
- GrabCAD Print vs Markforged Eiger
- GrabCAD Print vs Materialise Magics
- GrabCAD Print vs Oqton
- GrabCAD Print vs Formlabs PreForm
- GrabCAD Print vs Simplify3D
- GrabCAD Print vs Dyndrite
- GrabCAD Print vs 3YOURMIND
- GrabCAD Print vs Xometry
- GrabCAD Print vs AMFG
- GrabCAD Print vs Authentise
- GrabCAD Print vs KCF Technologies
- GrabCAD Print vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- GrabCAD Print vs LabVIEW
- GrabCAD Print vs SKF Enlight Centre
- GrabCAD Print vs ABB 800xA
- GrabCAD Print vs AVEVA System Platform
- GrabCAD Print vs Autodesk Netfabb
- GrabCAD Print vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- GrabCAD Print vs Samotics
- GrabCAD Print vs MOVUS
- GrabCAD Print vs Augury
- GrabCAD Print vs eMaint
- GrabCAD Print vs Erbessd Instruments
- GrabCAD Print vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- GrabCAD Print vs Sensemore
- GrabCAD Print vs Poseidon Systems
- GrabCAD Print vs PROGNOST Systems
- GrabCAD Print vs Maintenance Connection
- GrabCAD Print vs Oden Technologies
- GrabCAD Print vs OpenBOM
- Petasense vs Fusion 360
- Petasense vs Markforged Eiger
- Petasense vs Materialise Magics
- Petasense vs Oqton
- Petasense vs Formlabs PreForm
- Petasense vs Simplify3D
- Petasense vs Dyndrite
- Petasense vs 3YOURMIND
- Petasense vs Xometry
- Petasense vs AMFG
- Petasense vs Authentise
- Petasense vs KCF Technologies
- Petasense vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Petasense vs LabVIEW
- Petasense vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Petasense vs ABB 800xA
- Petasense vs AVEVA System Platform
- Petasense vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Petasense vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Petasense vs Samotics
- Petasense vs MOVUS
- Petasense vs Augury
- Petasense vs eMaint
- Petasense vs Erbessd Instruments
- Petasense vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Petasense vs Sensemore
- Petasense vs Poseidon Systems
- Petasense vs PROGNOST Systems
- Petasense vs Maintenance Connection
- Petasense vs Oden Technologies
- Petasense vs OpenBOM
