Manufacturing · head to head
COPA-DATA zenon vs GrabCAD Print

COPA-DATA zenon
Manufacturing
HMI, SCADA and energy automation platform licensed by I/O tag count
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

GrabCAD Print
Manufacturing
Stratasys print preparation, free in Standard form and 5,000 US dollars a year for Pro
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only GrabCAD Print has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: COPA-DATA zenon the I/O count that determines your licence band is a weighted calculation, not a variable tally, so projects sized from a tag list routinely land in a higher and more expensive band than budgeted.; GrabCAD Print it only drives Stratasys printers, so the free Standard tier is a hardware retention mechanism rather than a portable tool, and prepared jobs do not move to another vendor.
- They diverge on capability: COPA-DATA zenon covers I/O-banded licensing, GrabCAD Print covers Native CAD import.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which COPA-DATA zenon and GrabCAD Print actually diverge.
| Attribute | COPA-DATA zenon | GrabCAD Print |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per year |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux, Web | Windows, Desktop, Cloud |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in COPA-DATA zenon
- I/O-banded licensing
- IEC 61850 native
- zenon Logic
- Pharmaceutical compliance
- Multi-project engineering
- Redundancy
Only in GrabCAD Print
- Native CAD import
- Multi-technology support
- Tray arrangement and supports
- Nesting (Pro)
- Manufacturing templates (Pro)
- Part labelling (Pro)
- Wall thickness analysis (Pro)
- Cost estimation (Pro)
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
COPA-DATA zenon
- A pharmaceutical plant needing audit trail and electronic signature in the SCADA layer without building a validation wrapper around a generic HMInot GrabCAD Print
- A utility automating substations that wants IEC 61850 SCL import and DNP3 in the base product rather than as chargeable driver optionsnot GrabCAD Print
- A machine builder shipping identical HMI applications to many customers who wants one engineering project reused across machine and line levelnot GrabCAD Print
- A food and beverage site in German-speaking Europe where local integrator availability for zenon is strong and Rockwell coverage is notnot GrabCAD Print
GrabCAD Print
- A service bureau nesting many small parts into a single tray to raise volume utilisation and reduce cost per partnot COPA-DATA zenon
- A production department locking validated process parameters into a template so night shift operators cannot change themnot COPA-DATA zenon
- A design office running FDM and PolyJet machines and wanting one preparation tool rather than twonot COPA-DATA zenon
- An engineering team importing native CAD assemblies directly rather than maintaining an STL export workflownot COPA-DATA zenon
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
COPA-DATA zenon
- The I/O count that determines your licence band is a weighted calculation, not a variable tally, so projects sized from a tag list routinely land in a higher and more expensive band than budgeted.
- The integrator and engineering talent pool is concentrated in German-speaking Europe; a North American or Asian site can find itself dependent on a single partner with no competitive quote available.
- English-language documentation and community material lag the German equivalents, which slows engineers who are learning the product without formal COPA-DATA training.
- The annual software maintenance contract is a percentage of licence value, so a large I/O estate carries a recurring cost that does not fall even when the plant is stable and nothing is changing.
- Third-party ecosystem extensions are far fewer than for Ignition or FactoryTalk, so requirements outside the box tend to become custom engineering billed at partner day rates.
GrabCAD Print
- It only drives Stratasys printers, so the free Standard tier is a hardware retention mechanism rather than a portable tool, and prepared jobs do not move to another vendor.
- Pro is 5,000 US dollars per named user per year on top of machines that already cost six figures, and there is no floating licence in the standard offer, so shift-based teams buy multiple seats.
- The production features that most justify the spend, nesting and manufacturing templates, are all locked behind Pro, meaning the free tier is not viable for a bureau.
- Stratasys materials are proprietary and cartridge-locked, so the software sits on top of a consumables model where the recurring cost is set entirely by the vendor.
- Support and feature coverage vary by printer family; newer technologies such as SAF and the Neo SLA line have historically lagged FDM in the depth of preparation options exposed.
Pricing, plan by plan
COPA-DATA zenon
On request- zenon$undefined/year
- Runtime licensed in bands by calculated I/O count
- Numeric variables weighted upward in the I/O calculation, binary counted singly
- Engineering Studio licensed separately from runtime
GrabCAD Print
Free- GrabCAD Print StandardFree
- Free for Stratasys printer owners
- Native CAD import and tray arrangement
- Support generation and section tools
- GrabCAD Print Pro$5000/year
- Per named user per year
- Automated build nesting
- Manufacturing templates with locked process parameters
Which should you pick?
Choose COPA-DATA zenon if
- You need i/o-banded licensing.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web.
- You also want iec 61850 native.
Choose GrabCAD Print if
- You need native cad import.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Desktop, Cloud.
- You also want multi-technology support.
Questions people ask
- Is COPA-DATA zenon or GrabCAD Print better?
- Neither clearly leads. COPA-DATA zenon starts at On request and GrabCAD Print at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, COPA-DATA zenon or GrabCAD Print?
- GrabCAD Print has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for COPA-DATA zenon and Free for GrabCAD Print.
- Does COPA-DATA zenon or GrabCAD Print run on more platforms?
- COPA-DATA zenon runs on Windows, Linux, Web. GrabCAD Print runs on Windows, Desktop, Cloud.
- Can I use GrabCAD Print for free?
- Yes. GrabCAD Print has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. COPA-DATA zenon starts at On request.
- What is COPA-DATA zenon best used for?
- COPA-DATA zenon is most often used for a pharmaceutical plant needing audit trail and electronic signature in the scada layer without building a validation wrapper around a generic hmi, a utility automating substations that wants iec 61850 scl import and dnp3 in the base product rather than as chargeable driver options, a machine builder shipping identical hmi applications to many customers who wants one engineering project reused across machine and line level, a food and beverage site in german-speaking europe where local integrator availability for zenon is strong and rockwell coverage is not. Of those, a pharmaceutical plant needing audit trail and electronic signature in the scada layer without building a validation wrapper around a generic hmi and a utility automating substations that wants iec 61850 scl import and dnp3 in the base product rather than as chargeable driver options are not what GrabCAD Print is typically brought in for.
- What can COPA-DATA zenon do that GrabCAD Print cannot?
- COPA-DATA zenon covers I/O-banded licensing, IEC 61850 native, zenon Logic, Pharmaceutical compliance. GrabCAD Print covers Native CAD import, Multi-technology support, Tray arrangement and supports, Nesting (Pro).
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
COPA-DATA zenon: How is a zenon licence sized?
By calculated I/O count. Numeric variables are weighted upward in that calculation and binary values counted singly, so ask your partner for the calculated figure, not the variable count, before signing.
GrabCAD Print: Is GrabCAD Print free?
GrabCAD Print Standard is free for Stratasys printer owners. GrabCAD Print Pro is 5,000 US dollars per user per year.
COPA-DATA zenon: Is zenon only for factories?
No. A significant part of its installed base is electrical substation automation, where IEC 61850 support is native rather than an add-on.
GrabCAD Print: Can it drive a non-Stratasys printer?
No. It is tied to Stratasys hardware.
COPA-DATA zenon: Is there a free version?
There is a demo mode for evaluation and a free educational licence, but production runtime always needs a paid, I/O-banded licence.
GrabCAD Print: What do I actually get for the Pro fee?
Nesting, manufacturing templates, part labelling, wall thickness analysis and build cost estimation. These are production rather than prototyping features.
COPA-DATA zenon: Can zenon replace a PLC?
zenon Logic is an IEC 61131-3 soft PLC and can control non-safety-critical processes, but most deployments keep a hardware PLC and use zenon for visualisation and supervision.
GrabCAD Print: Is there a trial?
Yes, Stratasys has offered 30 and 60 day trials of Pro.
Related pages
More on COPA-DATA zenon
More on GrabCAD Print
Other head to heads
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Ignition
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- COPA-DATA zenon vs AVEVA System Platform
- COPA-DATA zenon vs GENESIS Version 11
- COPA-DATA zenon vs ABB 800xA
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Flow Software
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Materialise Magics
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Propel
- COPA-DATA zenon vs SolidWorks
- COPA-DATA zenon vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- COPA-DATA zenon vs SKF Enlight Centre
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Hippo CMMS
- COPA-DATA zenon vs 3YOURMIND
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Fusion 360
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Markforged Eiger
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Oqton
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Formlabs PreForm
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Simplify3D
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Dyndrite
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Xometry
- COPA-DATA zenon vs AMFG
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Authentise
- COPA-DATA zenon vs KCF Technologies
- COPA-DATA zenon vs LabVIEW
- COPA-DATA zenon vs Autodesk Netfabb
- GrabCAD Print vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- GrabCAD Print vs Ignition
- GrabCAD Print vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- GrabCAD Print vs AVEVA System Platform
- GrabCAD Print vs GENESIS Version 11
- GrabCAD Print vs ABB 800xA
- GrabCAD Print vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- GrabCAD Print vs Flow Software
- GrabCAD Print vs Materialise Magics
- GrabCAD Print vs Propel
- GrabCAD Print vs SolidWorks
- GrabCAD Print vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- GrabCAD Print vs SKF Enlight Centre
- GrabCAD Print vs Hippo CMMS
- GrabCAD Print vs 3YOURMIND
- GrabCAD Print vs Fusion 360
- GrabCAD Print vs Markforged Eiger
- GrabCAD Print vs Oqton
- GrabCAD Print vs Formlabs PreForm
- GrabCAD Print vs Simplify3D
- GrabCAD Print vs Dyndrite
- GrabCAD Print vs Xometry
- GrabCAD Print vs AMFG
- GrabCAD Print vs Authentise
- GrabCAD Print vs KCF Technologies
- GrabCAD Print vs LabVIEW
- GrabCAD Print vs Autodesk Netfabb
