Manufacturing · head to head
GrabCAD Print vs Hippo CMMS

GrabCAD Print
Manufacturing
Stratasys print preparation, free in Standard form and 5,000 US dollars a year for Pro
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Hippo CMMS
Manufacturing
Straightforward maintenance management, now part of Eptura
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only GrabCAD Print has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GrabCAD Print it only drives Stratasys printers, so the free Standard tier is a hardware retention mechanism rather than a portable tool, and prepared jobs do not move to another vendor.; Hippo CMMS no longer sold as a standalone product, so a new evaluation is really an Eptura evaluation with a different scope and price
- They diverge on capability: GrabCAD Print covers Native CAD import, Hippo CMMS covers Interactive site maps.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GrabCAD Print and Hippo CMMS actually diverge.
| Attribute | GrabCAD Print | Hippo CMMS |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per year | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Windows, Desktop, Cloud | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GrabCAD Print
- Native CAD import
- Multi-technology support
- Tray arrangement and supports
- Nesting (Pro)
- Manufacturing templates (Pro)
- Part labelling (Pro)
- Wall thickness analysis (Pro)
- Cost estimation (Pro)
Only in Hippo CMMS
- Interactive site maps
- Work order management
- Preventive maintenance
- Equipment records
- Vendor management
- Mobile access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GrabCAD Print
- A service bureau nesting many small parts into a single tray to raise volume utilisation and reduce cost per partnot Hippo CMMS
- A production department locking validated process parameters into a template so night shift operators cannot change themnot Hippo CMMS
- A design office running FDM and PolyJet machines and wanting one preparation tool rather than twonot Hippo CMMS
- An engineering team importing native CAD assemblies directly rather than maintaining an STL export workflownot Hippo CMMS
Hippo CMMS
- Facilities teams wanting a CMMS that a non-specialist can operatenot GrabCAD Print
- Sites where locating an asset on a floor plan is the natural way to find itnot GrabCAD Print
- Existing Hippo customers evaluating whether to stay within Epturanot GrabCAD Print
- Organisations wanting maintenance inside a broader workplace management suitenot GrabCAD Print
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GrabCAD Print
- It only drives Stratasys printers, so the free Standard tier is a hardware retention mechanism rather than a portable tool, and prepared jobs do not move to another vendor.
- Pro is 5,000 US dollars per named user per year on top of machines that already cost six figures, and there is no floating licence in the standard offer, so shift-based teams buy multiple seats.
- The production features that most justify the spend, nesting and manufacturing templates, are all locked behind Pro, meaning the free tier is not viable for a bureau.
- Stratasys materials are proprietary and cartridge-locked, so the software sits on top of a consumables model where the recurring cost is set entirely by the vendor.
- Support and feature coverage vary by printer family; newer technologies such as SAF and the Neo SLA line have historically lagged FDM in the depth of preparation options exposed.
Hippo CMMS
- No longer sold as a standalone product, so a new evaluation is really an Eptura evaluation with a different scope and price
- Pricing is not published, which makes it hard to compare against MaintainX or Limble without a sales process
- The simplicity that was its selling point becomes a ceiling for organisations with complex asset hierarchies
- Reporting is basic against competitors that have invested heavily in analytics
- Product direction now follows Eptura workplace strategy rather than maintenance-specific needs
Pricing, plan by plan
GrabCAD Print
Free- GrabCAD Print StandardFree
- Free for Stratasys printer owners
- Native CAD import and tray arrangement
- Support generation and section tools
- GrabCAD Print Pro$5000/year
- Per named user per year
- Automated build nesting
- Manufacturing templates with locked process parameters
Hippo CMMS
On request- Eptura Asset$undefined/month
- Work order management
- Preventive maintenance
- Asset records
Which should you pick?
Choose GrabCAD Print if
- You need native cad import.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Desktop, Cloud.
- You also want multi-technology support.
Choose Hippo CMMS if
- You need interactive site maps.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want work order management.
Questions people ask
- Is GrabCAD Print or Hippo CMMS better?
- Neither clearly leads. GrabCAD Print starts at Free and Hippo CMMS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GrabCAD Print or Hippo CMMS?
- GrabCAD Print has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for GrabCAD Print and On request for Hippo CMMS.
- Does GrabCAD Print or Hippo CMMS run on more platforms?
- GrabCAD Print runs on Windows, Desktop, Cloud. Hippo CMMS runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use GrabCAD Print for free?
- Yes. GrabCAD Print has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Hippo CMMS starts at On request.
- What is GrabCAD Print best used for?
- GrabCAD Print is most often used for a service bureau nesting many small parts into a single tray to raise volume utilisation and reduce cost per part, a production department locking validated process parameters into a template so night shift operators cannot change them, a design office running fdm and polyjet machines and wanting one preparation tool rather than two, an engineering team importing native cad assemblies directly rather than maintaining an stl export workflow. Of those, a service bureau nesting many small parts into a single tray to raise volume utilisation and reduce cost per part and a production department locking validated process parameters into a template so night shift operators cannot change them are not what Hippo CMMS is typically brought in for.
- What can GrabCAD Print do that Hippo CMMS cannot?
- GrabCAD Print covers Native CAD import, Multi-technology support, Tray arrangement and supports, Nesting (Pro). Hippo CMMS covers Interactive site maps, Work order management, Preventive maintenance, Equipment records.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GrabCAD Print: Is GrabCAD Print free?
GrabCAD Print Standard is free for Stratasys printer owners. GrabCAD Print Pro is 5,000 US dollars per user per year.
Hippo CMMS: Is Hippo CMMS still available?
Not as a standalone purchase. It was acquired by Eptura and its capabilities are part of Eptura Asset. Existing customers are still served.
GrabCAD Print: Can it drive a non-Stratasys printer?
No. It is tied to Stratasys hardware.
Hippo CMMS: What was distinctive about it?
Interactive facility maps. Placing assets on a floor plan and raising work orders from the drawing is a genuinely different way to navigate a site, and it is why it retained users against slicker competitors.
GrabCAD Print: What do I actually get for the Pro fee?
Nesting, manufacturing templates, part labelling, wall thickness analysis and build cost estimation. These are production rather than prototyping features.
Hippo CMMS: What does it cost?
Not published. Eptura quotes, which is a change from Hippo, whose pricing was easier to establish.
GrabCAD Print: Is there a trial?
Yes, Stratasys has offered 30 and 60 day trials of Pro.
Hippo CMMS: Should a new buyer consider it?
Evaluate Eptura Asset on its own terms, against MaintainX and Limble. Choosing it because of Hippo reviews written before the acquisition is a mistake.
Hippo CMMS: What happens to existing customers?
They continue to be supported within Eptura. The practical question is whether the broader workplace suite fits, since that is where the product roadmap now points.
Related pages
More on GrabCAD Print
Other head to heads
- GrabCAD Print vs Fusion 360
- GrabCAD Print vs Markforged Eiger
- GrabCAD Print vs Materialise Magics
- GrabCAD Print vs Oqton
- GrabCAD Print vs Formlabs PreForm
- GrabCAD Print vs Simplify3D
- GrabCAD Print vs Dyndrite
- GrabCAD Print vs 3YOURMIND
- GrabCAD Print vs Xometry
- GrabCAD Print vs AMFG
- GrabCAD Print vs Authentise
- GrabCAD Print vs KCF Technologies
- GrabCAD Print vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- GrabCAD Print vs LabVIEW
- GrabCAD Print vs SKF Enlight Centre
- GrabCAD Print vs ABB 800xA
- GrabCAD Print vs AVEVA System Platform
- GrabCAD Print vs Autodesk Netfabb
- GrabCAD Print vs Maintenance Connection
- GrabCAD Print vs eMaint
- GrabCAD Print vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- GrabCAD Print vs OpenBOM
- GrabCAD Print vs Propel
- GrabCAD Print vs ProShop ERP
- GrabCAD Print vs SolidWorks
- GrabCAD Print vs MachineMetrics
- GrabCAD Print vs Aras Innovator
- GrabCAD Print vs Arena PLM
- Hippo CMMS vs Fusion 360
- Hippo CMMS vs Markforged Eiger
- Hippo CMMS vs Materialise Magics
- Hippo CMMS vs Oqton
- Hippo CMMS vs Formlabs PreForm
- Hippo CMMS vs Simplify3D
- Hippo CMMS vs Dyndrite
- Hippo CMMS vs 3YOURMIND
- Hippo CMMS vs Xometry
- Hippo CMMS vs AMFG
- Hippo CMMS vs Authentise
- Hippo CMMS vs KCF Technologies
- Hippo CMMS vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Hippo CMMS vs LabVIEW
- Hippo CMMS vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Hippo CMMS vs ABB 800xA
- Hippo CMMS vs AVEVA System Platform
- Hippo CMMS vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Hippo CMMS vs Maintenance Connection
- Hippo CMMS vs eMaint
- Hippo CMMS vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Hippo CMMS vs OpenBOM
- Hippo CMMS vs Propel
- Hippo CMMS vs ProShop ERP
- Hippo CMMS vs SolidWorks
- Hippo CMMS vs MachineMetrics
- Hippo CMMS vs Aras Innovator
- Hippo CMMS vs Arena PLM
