Softwr

Technology · head to head

Google Chrome vs Memcached

Google Chrome logo

Google Chrome

Technology

Fast, secure browser built for the modern web

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Memcached logo

Memcached

Databases

Distributed memory object caching system

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Google Chrome multiple critical security vulnerabilities requiring frequent updates; 151 security flaws patched in Chrome 151 including 22 critical severities; Memcached no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
  • They diverge on capability: Google Chrome covers Fast page loading, Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Google Chrome and Memcached actually diverge.

Attributes where Google Chrome and Memcached differ
AttributeGoogle ChromeMemcached
Pricing modelUnknownOpen source, no licence fee; managed cloud billed separately
PlatformsWindows, macOS, Linux, iOS, AndroidLinux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted
CategoryTechnologyDatabases
Founded2008Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Google Chrome

  • Fast page loading
  • Extensive extension library
  • Cross-device sync
  • Built-in security
  • Developer tools
  • Incognito mode
  • Password manager
  • Auto-updates

Only in Memcached

  • In-memory key-value cache
  • Multithreaded
  • Client-side sharding
  • Predictable memory use

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Google Chrome

  • Web browsingnot Memcached
  • Web developmentnot Memcached
  • Online researchnot Memcached
  • Work applicationsnot Memcached
  • Entertainmentnot Memcached
  • Educationnot Memcached

Memcached

  • Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot Google Chrome
  • Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot Google Chrome
  • Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot Google Chrome

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Google Chrome

  • Multiple critical security vulnerabilities requiring frequent updates; 151 security flaws patched in Chrome 151 including 22 critical severities
  • Frequent arbitrary code execution vulnerabilities allow remote attackers to execute code inside sandbox via crafted HTML pages
  • Known use-after-free and integer overflow issues in V8 JavaScript engine and Codecs

Memcached

  • No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
  • No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
  • Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
  • Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents

Pricing, plan by plan

Google Chrome

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Google Chrome review.

Memcached

Free
  • MemcachedFree
    • Full functionality
    • Self-hosted
    • No usage limits

Which should you pick?

Choose Google Chrome if

  • You need fast page loading.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
  • You also want extensive extension library.
Google Chrome review

Choose Memcached if

  • You need in-memory key-value cache.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
  • You also want multithreaded.
Memcached review

Questions people ask

Is Google Chrome or Memcached better?
Neither clearly leads. Google Chrome starts at Free and Memcached at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Google Chrome or Memcached?
Google Chrome starts at Free and Memcached at Free.
Does Google Chrome or Memcached run on more platforms?
Google Chrome runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android. Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
Can I use Google Chrome for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Google Chrome best used for?
Google Chrome is most often used for web browsing, web development, online research, work applications. Of those, web browsing and web development are not what Memcached is typically brought in for.
What can Google Chrome do that Memcached cannot?
Google Chrome covers Fast page loading, Extensive extension library, Cross-device sync, Built-in security. Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Google Chrome: Does Google Chrome have offline browsing capabilities?

Chrome can display cached versions of previously visited web pages offline. Chrome removed the experimental offline mode flag, but can automatically load cached pages when offline for sites you have visited before.

Source
Memcached: Is Memcached free?

Yes, open source with no licence fee.

Google Chrome: Is Google Chrome free to use?

Yes. Google Chrome is completely free to download and use. There are no paid tiers or subscription requirements for standard browsing.

Source
Memcached: Memcached or Redis?

Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.

Memcached: Does Memcached persist data?

No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.

Share

Related pages

More on Google Chrome

More on Memcached

Keep looking

Other head to heads