Developer Tools · head to head
GNAT Pro vs Signicat

GNAT Pro
Developer Tools
Software development environments and toolchains for Ada, C/C++ and Rust
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Signicat
Cybersecurity
European digital identity hub connecting national eID schemes
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GNAT Pro no pricing published on website; requires contacting AdaCore directly for quotes; Signicat national eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GNAT Pro and Signicat actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GNAT Pro
Nothing recorded that Signicat does not also cover.
Only in Signicat
- eID scheme brokering
- Qualified electronic signatures
- Document verification
- AML screening
- Authentication
- Digital onboarding flows
- eIDAS compliance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GNAT Pro
- Building certified avionics software meeting DO-178B/C standardsnot Signicat
- Developing automotive embedded systems with ISO-26262 compliancenot Signicat
- Integrating Ada, C/C++, and Rust components in single codebasenot Signicat
- Managing software supply chain vulnerabilities and SBOMsnot Signicat
- Supporting long-lived software systems spanning decadesnot Signicat
Signicat
- A lender expanding from Norway into Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands without four separate eID integrationsnot GNAT Pro
- An insurer needing eIDAS qualified signatures on policy documents that will hold up in a European courtnot GNAT Pro
- A bank that wants customers to onboard with their existing national bank ID rather than photographing a passportnot GNAT Pro
- A public sector body needing cross-border recognition of notified eID schemes under eIDASnot GNAT Pro
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GNAT Pro
- No pricing published on website; requires contacting AdaCore directly for quotes
- Vendor indicates per-user, per-year subscription model but does not disclose specific costs
Signicat
- National eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- Value is concentrated in Northern and Western Europe, and coverage in Southern and Eastern Europe is thinner, so a pan-European rollout still hits gaps requiring document fallback.
- Pricing is per transaction and quoted, and because scheme rates vary by country the cost per onboarded customer differs materially between markets in ways that complicate unit economics.
- Each eID scheme connection typically carries its own setup fee and approval process, so adding a country is a project with a lead time rather than a configuration change.
- Availability is tied to the national schemes, meaning an outage at BankID or MitID stops your onboarding entirely and there is no vendor-side mitigation for it.
Pricing, plan by plan
GNAT Pro
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GNAT Pro review.
Signicat
On request- Signicat Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per transaction with national scheme fees passed through
- Signature and verification products licensed separately
- Setup fee per eID scheme connected
Which should you pick?
Choose GNAT Pro if
Nothing in the data separates GNAT Pro from Signicat on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Signicat if
- You need eid scheme brokering.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want qualified electronic signatures.
Questions people ask
- Is GNAT Pro or Signicat better?
- Neither clearly leads. GNAT Pro starts at On request and Signicat at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GNAT Pro or Signicat?
- GNAT Pro starts at On request and Signicat at On request.
- Does GNAT Pro or Signicat run on more platforms?
- GNAT Pro runs on Web. Signicat runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is GNAT Pro best used for?
- GNAT Pro is most often used for building certified avionics software meeting do-178b/c standards, developing automotive embedded systems with iso-26262 compliance, integrating ada, c/c++, and rust components in single codebase, managing software supply chain vulnerabilities and sboms. Of those, building certified avionics software meeting do-178b/c standards and developing automotive embedded systems with iso-26262 compliance are not what Signicat is typically brought in for.
- What can GNAT Pro do that Signicat cannot?
- Signicat covers eID scheme brokering, Qualified electronic signatures, Document verification, AML screening.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GNAT Pro: How much does GNAT Pro cost?
GNAT Pro pricing is not published on the website. Customers must request a pricing quote by contacting AdaCore directly or speaking with a GNAT Pro expert.
SourceSignicat: Is this an alternative to a document verification vendor?
Only where national eID exists. In markets with a mature bank ID scheme it is better; elsewhere you fall back to document checks, which Signicat also provides.
GNAT Pro: What is GNAT Pro licensing model?
GNAT Pro is sold on a per-user, per-year basis with no license locks. Customers can request pricing for their specific needs.
SourceSignicat: Do we still pay the eID schemes?
Yes. Scheme fees are passed through in addition to Signicat charges. Ask for the split when comparing to a direct integration.
Signicat: Are signatures legally qualified?
Signicat supports eIDAS qualified electronic signatures, which carry the highest legal standing in the EU, as well as advanced signatures.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- GNAT Pro vs CLion
- GNAT Pro vs Rust
- GNAT Pro vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- GNAT Pro vs Keil MDK
- GNAT Pro vs RAD Studio
- GNAT Pro vs Penpot
- GNAT Pro vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- GNAT Pro vs Helix
- GNAT Pro vs JetBrains Rider
- GNAT Pro vs Coder
- GNAT Pro vs StackBlitz
- GNAT Pro vs ConfigCat
- GNAT Pro vs Nix
- GNAT Pro vs Nixpacks
- GNAT Pro vs Octopus Deploy
- GNAT Pro vs Okteto
- GNAT Pro vs OpsLevel
- GNAT Pro vs PartyKit
- GNAT Pro vs Jumio
- GNAT Pro vs Sumsub
- GNAT Pro vs IDnow
- GNAT Pro vs Trulioo
- GNAT Pro vs Veriff
- GNAT Pro vs iDenfy
- GNAT Pro vs Yoti
- GNAT Pro vs Shufti Pro
- GNAT Pro vs Socure
- GNAT Pro vs March Networks
- GNAT Pro vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- GNAT Pro vs Semperis
- GNAT Pro vs MetricStream
- GNAT Pro vs Microsoft Defender
- GNAT Pro vs Mimecast
- GNAT Pro vs Motorola Vigilant
- GNAT Pro vs Nessus
- GNAT Pro vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Signicat vs CLion
- Signicat vs Rust
- Signicat vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Signicat vs Keil MDK
- Signicat vs RAD Studio
- Signicat vs Penpot
- Signicat vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Signicat vs Helix
- Signicat vs JetBrains Rider
- Signicat vs Coder
- Signicat vs StackBlitz
- Signicat vs ConfigCat
- Signicat vs Nix
- Signicat vs Nixpacks
- Signicat vs Octopus Deploy
- Signicat vs Okteto
- Signicat vs OpsLevel
- Signicat vs PartyKit
- Signicat vs Jumio
- Signicat vs Sumsub
- Signicat vs IDnow
- Signicat vs Trulioo
- Signicat vs Veriff
- Signicat vs iDenfy
- Signicat vs Yoti
- Signicat vs Shufti Pro
- Signicat vs Socure
- Signicat vs March Networks
- Signicat vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Signicat vs Semperis
- Signicat vs MetricStream
- Signicat vs Microsoft Defender
- Signicat vs Mimecast
- Signicat vs Motorola Vigilant
- Signicat vs Nessus
- Signicat vs Microsoft Sentinel
