Developer Tools · head to head
Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Signicat

Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Developer Tools
Cloud development environments repositioned as a control plane for software engineering agents
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Signicat
Cybersecurity
European digital identity hub connecting national eID schemes
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Ona (formerly Gitpod) has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Ona (formerly Gitpod) acquisition risk has already materialised: the company closed a sale to OpenAI on 10 August 2026 and now sits inside the Codex team, so nothing public guarantees pricing, continuity or neutrality between model vendors beyond honouring existing commitments.; Signicat national eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- They diverge on capability: Ona (formerly Gitpod) covers Ephemeral environments, Signicat covers eID scheme brokering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ona (formerly Gitpod) and Signicat actually diverge.
| Attribute | Ona (formerly Gitpod) | Signicat |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per month by compute unit | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud Platform | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Ephemeral environments
- Agent sessions
- Bring your own cloud
- Devcontainer standard
- Compute unit budgeting
- Enterprise identity
Only in Signicat
- eID scheme brokering
- Qualified electronic signatures
- Document verification
- AML screening
- Authentication
- Digital onboarding flows
- eIDAS compliance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setupnot Signicat
- Running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptopnot Signicat
- Keeping source code off contractor and offshore laptops by moving the whole environment into a controlled accountnot Signicat
- Reproducing a hard-to-configure toolchain for a short-lived project without polluting anyone machinenot Signicat
Signicat
- A lender expanding from Norway into Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands without four separate eID integrationsnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- An insurer needing eIDAS qualified signatures on policy documents that will hold up in a European courtnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- A bank that wants customers to onboard with their existing national bank ID rather than photographing a passportnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- A public sector body needing cross-border recognition of notified eID schemes under eIDASnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Acquisition risk has already materialised: the company closed a sale to OpenAI on 10 August 2026 and now sits inside the Codex team, so nothing public guarantees pricing, continuity or neutrality between model vendors beyond honouring existing commitments.
- Two disruptive changes of direction inside a year, from development environments to agent orchestration and then from independence to acquisition, mean the product a browser IDE buyer originally chose no longer exists in that form.
- The Gitpod Classic sunset on 15 October 2025 required manual conversion of configuration, hand-moved secrets, self-rescued workspace data and a brand new account, which is the clearest available precedent for how the vendor handles deprecation.
- Community self-hosting is finished: the AGPL-3.0 repository is deprecated by its own README, and self-hosted now means a vendor-operated install in your AWS or GCP account, with no Azure, no on-premises and no air-gapped path.
- Pricing is difficult to model because it runs on a compute unit currency where subscription credits expire at the end of the month, the mapping from units to actual compute is not published on the pricing page, and Enterprise is quotation only.
Signicat
- National eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- Value is concentrated in Northern and Western Europe, and coverage in Southern and Eastern Europe is thinner, so a pan-European rollout still hits gaps requiring document fallback.
- Pricing is per transaction and quoted, and because scheme rates vary by country the cost per onboarded customer differs materially between markets in ways that complicate unit economics.
- Each eID scheme connection typically carries its own setup fee and approval process, so adding a country is a project with a lead time rather than a configuration change.
- Availability is tied to the national schemes, meaning an outage at BankID or MitID stops your onboarding entirely and there is no vendor-side mitigation for it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 3 parallel environments
- Machines up to 4 vCPU, 16 GB memory and 80 GB disk
- Ona Cloud multi-tenant only
- Core$20/month
- From 20 US dollars a month, up to 100 team members
- Includes 80 to 2,200 recurring compute units a month depending on tier
- Additional units from 10 US dollars per 40 units
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single-tenant deployment in your own AWS or GCP account
- SAML and OIDC single sign-on
- Dedicated account management and forward deployed engineers
Signicat
On request- Signicat Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per transaction with national scheme fees passed through
- Signature and verification products licensed separately
- Setup fee per eID scheme connected
Which should you pick?
Choose Ona (formerly Gitpod) if
- You need ephemeral environments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud Platform.
- You also want agent sessions.
Choose Signicat if
- You need eid scheme brokering.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want qualified electronic signatures.
Questions people ask
- Is Ona (formerly Gitpod) or Signicat better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ona (formerly Gitpod) starts at Free and Signicat at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ona (formerly Gitpod) or Signicat?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Ona (formerly Gitpod) and On request for Signicat.
- Does Ona (formerly Gitpod) or Signicat run on more platforms?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud Platform. Signicat runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Ona (formerly Gitpod) for free?
- Yes. Ona (formerly Gitpod) has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Signicat starts at On request.
- What is Ona (formerly Gitpod) best used for?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) is most often used for giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setup, running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptop, keeping source code off contractor and offshore laptops by moving the whole environment into a controlled account, reproducing a hard-to-configure toolchain for a short-lived project without polluting anyone machine. Of those, giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setup and running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptop are not what Signicat is typically brought in for.
- What can Ona (formerly Gitpod) do that Signicat cannot?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) covers Ephemeral environments, Agent sessions, Bring your own cloud, Devcontainer standard. Signicat covers eID scheme brokering, Qualified electronic signatures, Document verification, AML screening.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ona (formerly Gitpod): Is Gitpod still called Gitpod?
No. It rebranded to Ona in September 2025, and gitpod.io now redirects to ona.com. The company was acquired by OpenAI in a deal that closed on 10 August 2026.
Signicat: Is this an alternative to a document verification vendor?
Only where national eID exists. In markets with a mature bank ID scheme it is better; elsewhere you fall back to document checks, which Signicat also provides.
Ona (formerly Gitpod): Can I still self-host it for free?
No. The AGPL-3.0 self-hosted project is deprecated by its own README. What is offered now is a vendor-operated single-tenant install in your AWS or GCP account on the Enterprise plan.
Signicat: Do we still pay the eID schemes?
Yes. Scheme fees are passed through in addition to Signicat charges. Ask for the split when comparing to a direct integration.
Ona (formerly Gitpod): What happened to Gitpod Classic?
Pay-as-you-go Classic was switched off on 15 October 2025. Migration required converting gitpod.yml to devcontainer.json, moving secrets by hand, downloading workspace data before the cutoff and creating a new account.
Signicat: Are signatures legally qualified?
Signicat supports eIDAS qualified electronic signatures, which carry the highest legal standing in the EU, as well as advanced signatures.
Ona (formerly Gitpod): What does it cost?
Core starts at 20 US dollars a month and includes a monthly allowance of Ona Compute Units, with more from 10 dollars per 40 units. Subscription credits expire monthly. Enterprise is quoted.
Related pages
More on Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Other head to heads
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Coder
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs CodeSandbox
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs StackBlitz
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Namespace
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Daytona
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Earthly
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Nixpacks
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Spacelift
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Atlantis
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Backstage
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs ConfigCat
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Xlinesoft
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs GNU Emacs
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Keil MDK
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Vite
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Bazel
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Jumio
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Sumsub
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs IDnow
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Trulioo
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Veriff
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs iDenfy
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Yoti
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Shufti Pro
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Socure
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs March Networks
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Semperis
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs MetricStream
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Microsoft Defender
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Mimecast
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Motorola Vigilant
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Nessus
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Signicat vs Coder
- Signicat vs CodeSandbox
- Signicat vs StackBlitz
- Signicat vs Namespace
- Signicat vs Daytona
- Signicat vs Earthly
- Signicat vs Nixpacks
- Signicat vs Spacelift
- Signicat vs Atlantis
- Signicat vs Backstage
- Signicat vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Signicat vs ConfigCat
- Signicat vs Xlinesoft
- Signicat vs GNU Emacs
- Signicat vs Keil MDK
- Signicat vs Vite
- Signicat vs Bazel
- Signicat vs Jumio
- Signicat vs Sumsub
- Signicat vs IDnow
- Signicat vs Trulioo
- Signicat vs Veriff
- Signicat vs iDenfy
- Signicat vs Yoti
- Signicat vs Shufti Pro
- Signicat vs Socure
- Signicat vs March Networks
- Signicat vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Signicat vs Semperis
- Signicat vs MetricStream
- Signicat vs Microsoft Defender
- Signicat vs Mimecast
- Signicat vs Motorola Vigilant
- Signicat vs Nessus
- Signicat vs Microsoft Sentinel
