Nonprofits · head to head
Glue Up vs OpenGrants

Glue Up
Nonprofits
Membership, events and engagement software with strong Asia-Pacific presence
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

OpenGrants
Nonprofits
Low-cost grant search across federal, state and private funders, with a paid consultant marketplace alongside
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenGrants has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Glue Up pricing is not published, and quotes vary substantially by region, which makes budgeting harder than with the published North American tools; OpenGrants coverage of private foundations is thinner and less curated than Candid or Instrumentl, so a prospect list built solely from OpenGrants will miss foundations that never post public opportunity notices.
- They diverge on capability: Glue Up covers Event management, OpenGrants covers Grant search.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Glue Up and OpenGrants actually diverge.
| Attribute | Glue Up | OpenGrants |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Nonprofits).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Glue Up
- Event management
- Membership management
- Member mobile app
- Email campaigns
- Integrated CRM
- Regional payments
Only in OpenGrants
- Grant search
- Saved searches and alerts
- Funder profiles
- Opportunity tracking
- Consultant marketplace
- Free tier
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Glue Up
- Chambers of commerce and professional bodies operating across Asia-Pacificnot OpenGrants
- Associations whose events are the core of member value rather than an add-onnot OpenGrants
- Organisations wanting a branded member app rather than a web portalnot OpenGrants
- Bodies needing local payment methods and regional data residencynot OpenGrants
OpenGrants
- A small nonprofit with no research budget that needs to know whether relevant grants exist before hiring anyonenot Glue Up
- A startup hunting SBIR, state innovation and economic development funding across multiple agenciesnot Glue Up
- A freelance grant writer covering several clients who cannot pass on a several-hundred-dollar monthly database costnot Glue Up
- An organisation wanting to hire a grant writer for one application without running a procurementnot Glue Up
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Glue Up
- Pricing is not published, and quotes vary substantially by region, which makes budgeting harder than with the published North American tools
- Membership management is less deep than the dedicated association management systems, reflecting its event-management origins
- Smaller North American and European ecosystem, so integrations and local references are thinner outside Asia
- Fundraising and donor management are weak, so charities whose main activity is giving should look elsewhere
- The breadth means individual modules are good rather than excellent when compared against specialist tools
OpenGrants
- Coverage of private foundations is thinner and less curated than Candid or Instrumentl, so a prospect list built solely from OpenGrants will miss foundations that never post public opportunity notices.
- The index leans on public opportunity feeds, which means it is strongest on government funding and weakest on the relationship-driven private philanthropy that most nonprofits actually rely on.
- Matching is keyword driven rather than fit-scored, so users receive alerts for opportunities they are ineligible for and must qualify each one by hand.
- The consultant marketplace is a directory with variable quality rather than a vetted panel, so buyers carry the risk of choosing a weak grant writer themselves.
- It is a US-focused index, offering little to organisations seeking UK, EU or Canadian funding.
Pricing, plan by plan
Glue Up
On request- Essentials$undefined/year
- Event management
- Membership
- Email campaigns
- Professional$undefined/year
- All Essentials features
- Member mobile app
- CRM
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Multi-chapter
- API access
- Custom integrations
OpenGrants
Free- FreeFree
- Core grant search
- Limited results and saved searches
- No card required
- Subscription$9/month
- Full search access
- Saved searches and alerts
- Funder profiles
Which should you pick?
Choose Glue Up if
- You need event management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want membership management.
Choose OpenGrants if
- You need grant search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want saved searches and alerts.
Questions people ask
- Is Glue Up or OpenGrants better?
- Neither clearly leads. Glue Up starts at On request and OpenGrants at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Glue Up or OpenGrants?
- OpenGrants has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Glue Up and Free for OpenGrants.
- Does Glue Up or OpenGrants run on more platforms?
- Glue Up runs on Web, iOS, Android. OpenGrants runs on Web.
- Can I use OpenGrants for free?
- Yes. OpenGrants has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Glue Up starts at On request.
- What is Glue Up best used for?
- Glue Up is most often used for chambers of commerce and professional bodies operating across asia-pacific, associations whose events are the core of member value rather than an add-on, organisations wanting a branded member app rather than a web portal, bodies needing local payment methods and regional data residency. Of those, chambers of commerce and professional bodies operating across asia-pacific and associations whose events are the core of member value rather than an add-on are not what OpenGrants is typically brought in for.
- What can Glue Up do that OpenGrants cannot?
- Glue Up covers Event management, Membership management, Member mobile app, Email campaigns. OpenGrants covers Grant search, Saved searches and alerts, Funder profiles, Opportunity tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Glue Up: Where is Glue Up strongest?
Asia-Pacific. Local payment methods, WeChat integration, regional data residency and in-region support are things the North American platforms cannot match there.
OpenGrants: How much does it cost?
$9 a month or $99 a year after a seven day trial, with a free tier of core search retained.
Glue Up: Was it called something else?
Yes, EventBank. The rename to Glue Up reflected the shift from pure event management to membership and engagement.
OpenGrants: Why is it so much cheaper than Candid?
Because it indexes public and semi-public opportunity feeds with automation rather than employing researchers to code foundation records from tax filings. You trade depth of private foundation intelligence for price.
Glue Up: What does it cost?
Not published, and it varies by region. Expect an annual contract quoted on member count and modules.
OpenGrants: Does it cover private foundations?
Partially. It is strongest on federal and state programmes. For systematic private foundation research, Candid remains the reference source.
Glue Up: Is the member app real?
Yes, a branded native app rather than a mobile web view. For associations whose members network at events, it is one of the strongest reasons to choose it.
OpenGrants: Is the consultant marketplace vetted?
It is a directory, not a vetted panel. Check references and past awards yourself.
Glue Up: Should a US-only association consider it?
It can, but Wild Apricot and MemberClicks have published pricing, larger local ecosystems and more local references. The Asia-Pacific advantage is the reason to pick Glue Up.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Glue Up vs Wild Apricot
- Glue Up vs Tendenci
- Glue Up vs Handbid
- Glue Up vs Constant Contact
- Glue Up vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Glue Up vs Bloomerang
- Glue Up vs NeonCRM
- Glue Up vs EveryAction
- Glue Up vs DonorPerfect
- Glue Up vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- Glue Up vs Salsa CRM
- Glue Up vs GiveSmart
- Glue Up vs Google Nonprofit Tools
- Glue Up vs InitLive
- Glue Up vs Keela
- Glue Up vs Kindful
- Glue Up vs Microsoft Nonprofit Program
- Glue Up vs MemberClicks
- Glue Up vs GuideStar
- Glue Up vs GrantStation
- Glue Up vs Instrumentl
- Glue Up vs Candid
- Glue Up vs Submittable
- Glue Up vs CharityEngine
- Glue Up vs CommCare
- Glue Up vs Aplos
- Glue Up vs Blackbaud Grantmaking
- Glue Up vs Fluxx
- Glue Up vs Foundant Technologies
- Glue Up vs Classy
- Glue Up vs Apptio Monetize
- Glue Up vs Bloomerang Volunteer
- Glue Up vs Bonterra
- OpenGrants vs Wild Apricot
- OpenGrants vs Tendenci
- OpenGrants vs Handbid
- OpenGrants vs Constant Contact
- OpenGrants vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- OpenGrants vs Bloomerang
- OpenGrants vs NeonCRM
- OpenGrants vs EveryAction
- OpenGrants vs DonorPerfect
- OpenGrants vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- OpenGrants vs Salsa CRM
- OpenGrants vs GiveSmart
- OpenGrants vs Google Nonprofit Tools
- OpenGrants vs InitLive
- OpenGrants vs Keela
- OpenGrants vs Kindful
- OpenGrants vs Microsoft Nonprofit Program
- OpenGrants vs MemberClicks
- OpenGrants vs GuideStar
- OpenGrants vs GrantStation
- OpenGrants vs Instrumentl
- OpenGrants vs Candid
- OpenGrants vs Submittable
- OpenGrants vs CharityEngine
- OpenGrants vs CommCare
- OpenGrants vs Aplos
- OpenGrants vs Blackbaud Grantmaking
- OpenGrants vs Fluxx
- OpenGrants vs Foundant Technologies
- OpenGrants vs Classy
- OpenGrants vs Apptio Monetize
- OpenGrants vs Bloomerang Volunteer
- OpenGrants vs Bonterra
