Nonprofits · head to head
GiveSmart vs OpenGrants

GiveSmart
Nonprofits
Mobile bidding and event fundraising for charity auctions and galas
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

OpenGrants
Nonprofits
Low-cost grant search across federal, state and private funders, with a paid consultant marketplace alongside
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenGrants has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GiveSmart licensing is annual while many buyers run a single event a year, so the effective cost per event is far higher than the annual figure makes it look.; OpenGrants coverage of private foundations is thinner and less curated than Candid or Instrumentl, so a prospect list built solely from OpenGrants will miss foundations that never post public opportunity notices.
- They diverge on capability: GiveSmart covers Mobile bidding, OpenGrants covers Grant search.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GiveSmart and OpenGrants actually diverge.
| Attribute | GiveSmart | OpenGrants |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Nonprofits).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GiveSmart
- Mobile bidding
- Auction management
- Ticketing and check in
- Text to give
- Paddle raise and appeals
- Payment settlement
Only in OpenGrants
- Grant search
- Saved searches and alerts
- Funder profiles
- Opportunity tracking
- Consultant marketplace
- Free tier
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GiveSmart
- A hospital or school foundation running an annual gala with a live and silent auctionnot OpenGrants
- An organisation losing revenue to uncollected pledges after event nightnot OpenGrants
- A charity running several auction events a year that can amortise an annual licencenot OpenGrants
- A team wanting bidding, check in and payment settlement handled by one system on the nightnot OpenGrants
OpenGrants
- A small nonprofit with no research budget that needs to know whether relevant grants exist before hiring anyonenot GiveSmart
- A startup hunting SBIR, state innovation and economic development funding across multiple agenciesnot GiveSmart
- A freelance grant writer covering several clients who cannot pass on a several-hundred-dollar monthly database costnot GiveSmart
- An organisation wanting to hire a grant writer for one application without running a procurementnot GiveSmart
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GiveSmart
- Licensing is annual while many buyers run a single event a year, so the effective cost per event is far higher than the annual figure makes it look.
- Pricing is not published, and quotes commonly separate the licence, payment processing, hardware and event night staffing, so the first number a buyer sees is rarely the total.
- On site technical support and equipment are usually extra, and organisations that decline them discover that event night is the worst possible time to be self supporting.
- It is event software rather than a donor CRM, so guest and bidder data has to be pushed into the CRM afterwards or the relationship built at the gala is not retained.
- Consolidation under Community Brands means several nominally competing products share an owner, which reduces the negotiating leverage a buyer thinks a shortlist gives them.
OpenGrants
- Coverage of private foundations is thinner and less curated than Candid or Instrumentl, so a prospect list built solely from OpenGrants will miss foundations that never post public opportunity notices.
- The index leans on public opportunity feeds, which means it is strongest on government funding and weakest on the relationship-driven private philanthropy that most nonprofits actually rely on.
- Matching is keyword driven rather than fit-scored, so users receive alerts for opportunities they are ineligible for and must qualify each one by hand.
- The consultant marketplace is a directory with variable quality rather than a vetted panel, so buyers carry the risk of choosing a weak grant writer themselves.
- It is a US-focused index, offering little to organisations seeking UK, EU or Canadian funding.
Pricing, plan by plan
GiveSmart
On request- GiveSmart$undefined/year
- Quoted as an annual licence rather than per event
- Payment processing charged separately on funds raised
- On site staffing, hardware and additional event support quoted as add ons
OpenGrants
Free- FreeFree
- Core grant search
- Limited results and saved searches
- No card required
- Subscription$9/month
- Full search access
- Saved searches and alerts
- Funder profiles
Which should you pick?
Choose GiveSmart if
- You need mobile bidding.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want auction management.
Choose OpenGrants if
- You need grant search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want saved searches and alerts.
Questions people ask
- Is GiveSmart or OpenGrants better?
- Neither clearly leads. GiveSmart starts at On request and OpenGrants at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GiveSmart or OpenGrants?
- OpenGrants has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for GiveSmart and Free for OpenGrants.
- Does GiveSmart or OpenGrants run on more platforms?
- GiveSmart runs on Web, iOS, Android. OpenGrants runs on Web.
- Can I use OpenGrants for free?
- Yes. OpenGrants has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GiveSmart starts at On request.
- What is GiveSmart best used for?
- GiveSmart is most often used for a hospital or school foundation running an annual gala with a live and silent auction, an organisation losing revenue to uncollected pledges after event night, a charity running several auction events a year that can amortise an annual licence, a team wanting bidding, check in and payment settlement handled by one system on the night. Of those, a hospital or school foundation running an annual gala with a live and silent auction and an organisation losing revenue to uncollected pledges after event night are not what OpenGrants is typically brought in for.
- What can GiveSmart do that OpenGrants cannot?
- GiveSmart covers Mobile bidding, Auction management, Ticketing and check in, Text to give. OpenGrants covers Grant search, Saved searches and alerts, Funder profiles, Opportunity tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GiveSmart: Is GiveSmart priced per event?
It is normally an annual licence, so organisations running one event a year carry the full cost against one night.
OpenGrants: How much does it cost?
$9 a month or $99 a year after a seven day trial, with a free tier of core search retained.
GiveSmart: Who owns GiveSmart?
Community Brands, the private equity backed nonprofit and association software group that also owns MemberClicks.
OpenGrants: Why is it so much cheaper than Candid?
Because it indexes public and semi-public opportunity feeds with automation rather than employing researchers to code foundation records from tax filings. You trade depth of private foundation intelligence for price.
GiveSmart: Does it replace our donor database?
No. It captures bidders and guests at an event and needs to feed a CRM afterwards.
OpenGrants: Does it cover private foundations?
Partially. It is strongest on federal and state programmes. For systematic private foundation research, Candid remains the reference source.
GiveSmart: What is the actual benefit over paper bid sheets?
Bidding continues across the room and payment settles before guests leave, which is where paper auctions lose money.
OpenGrants: Is the consultant marketplace vetted?
It is a directory, not a vetted panel. Check references and past awards yourself.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- GiveSmart vs Handbid
- GiveSmart vs Qgiv
- GiveSmart vs OneCause
- GiveSmart vs Give Lively
- GiveSmart vs Raisely
- GiveSmart vs Classy
- GiveSmart vs MobileCause
- GiveSmart vs Candid
- GiveSmart vs SmartSimple Cloud
- GiveSmart vs CiviCRM
- GiveSmart vs InitLive
- GiveSmart vs Constant Contact
- GiveSmart vs Bloomerang Volunteer
- GiveSmart vs Bonterra
- GiveSmart vs Canva for Nonprofits
- GiveSmart vs Cause IQ
- GiveSmart vs Charity Navigator
- GiveSmart vs GuideStar
- GiveSmart vs GrantStation
- GiveSmart vs Instrumentl
- GiveSmart vs Submittable
- GiveSmart vs CharityEngine
- GiveSmart vs CommCare
- GiveSmart vs Aplos
- GiveSmart vs Blackbaud Grantmaking
- GiveSmart vs Fluxx
- GiveSmart vs Foundant Technologies
- GiveSmart vs Apptio Monetize
- OpenGrants vs Handbid
- OpenGrants vs Qgiv
- OpenGrants vs OneCause
- OpenGrants vs Give Lively
- OpenGrants vs Raisely
- OpenGrants vs Classy
- OpenGrants vs MobileCause
- OpenGrants vs Candid
- OpenGrants vs SmartSimple Cloud
- OpenGrants vs CiviCRM
- OpenGrants vs InitLive
- OpenGrants vs Constant Contact
- OpenGrants vs Bloomerang Volunteer
- OpenGrants vs Bonterra
- OpenGrants vs Canva for Nonprofits
- OpenGrants vs Cause IQ
- OpenGrants vs Charity Navigator
- OpenGrants vs GuideStar
- OpenGrants vs GrantStation
- OpenGrants vs Instrumentl
- OpenGrants vs Submittable
- OpenGrants vs CharityEngine
- OpenGrants vs CommCare
- OpenGrants vs Aplos
- OpenGrants vs Blackbaud Grantmaking
- OpenGrants vs Fluxx
- OpenGrants vs Foundant Technologies
- OpenGrants vs Apptio Monetize
