Healthcare · head to head
Gleamer vs Quantum Health

Gleamer
Healthcare
CE marked and FDA cleared imaging AI suite for bone trauma and chest, now owned by RadNet
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Quantum Health
Healthcare
Healthcare navigation for self insured employers, delivered by pods of human care coordinators
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Gleamer radNet, an imaging provider that competes with many independent Gleamer customers, now owns the company and also owns the competing DeepHealth AI portfolio, so roadmap and pricing priorities are an open question for non-RadNet buyers.; Quantum Health nothing is published: no per employee per month rate, no implementation fee, no minimum eligible lives, so an employer cannot benchmark a Quantum quote against anything before entering a sales process.
- They diverge on capability: Gleamer covers BoneView, Quantum Health covers Care coordinator pods.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Gleamer and Quantum Health actually diverge.
| Attribute | Gleamer | Quantum Health |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Cloud, On-premise | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Gleamer
- BoneView
- ChestView
- BoneAge
- BoneMetrics
- LungCT and BoneCT
- BreastView
- Pixyl.Neuro
- Gleamer Copilot
Only in Quantum Health
- Care coordinator pods
- Real time intercept
- Provider steering
- Claims and benefits advocacy
- Embold Plus tier
- Quantum Flex tier
- Quantum Signature tier
- Point solution routing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Gleamer
- An emergency department where junior doctors read plain films before radiology review and missed fractures are a recurring incident themenot Quantum Health
- An urgent care network standardising musculoskeletal reading quality across sites with variable radiology covernot Quantum Health
- A paediatric service automating bone age assessment to remove a slow manual atlas comparisonnot Quantum Health
- An orthopaedic service that needs automated limb alignment and measurement before surgical planning rather than manual measurement on the workstationnot Quantum Health
Quantum Health
- A self insured employer of a few thousand staff whose members call the carrier, get transferred repeatedly and make expensive care decisions unsupportednot Gleamer
- An employer that has bought many point solutions and needs someone to route members into the ones already fundednot Gleamer
- A plan wanting intervention before an elective procedure is scheduled rather than a report about it afterwardsnot Gleamer
- An employer that wants navigation without giving the same vendor the clinical delivery contractnot Gleamer
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Gleamer
- RadNet, an imaging provider that competes with many independent Gleamer customers, now owns the company and also owns the competing DeepHealth AI portfolio, so roadmap and pricing priorities are an open question for non-RadNet buyers.
- The measured benefit is largest for less experienced readers, so a specialist musculoskeletal service will see far less improvement than the published reader studies suggest.
- Cleared indications differ per module and per market, and the FDA cleared set is narrower than the CE marked European set, so an American buyer cannot rely on European reference sites.
- Each additional module adds alert volume into the same worklist, and departments running several Gleamer algorithms report needing local threshold tuning to keep radiologist trust.
- Pricing is per exam and not published, which makes budgeting difficult for an emergency department whose plain film volume swings seasonally.
Quantum Health
- Nothing is published: no per employee per month rate, no implementation fee, no minimum eligible lives, so an employer cannot benchmark a Quantum quote against anything before entering a sales process.
- It sells to self insured employers of roughly 500 employees and up, so smaller and fully insured employers are outside the model regardless of interest.
- Quantum navigates but does not deliver care, so it cannot close a loop with a visit of its own, and members who are steered still have to obtain an appointment through the ordinary network.
- The pod model depends on staffing continuity, and turnover in the coordinator teams degrades exactly the consistency that the pod concept sells, which is invisible in a demonstration.
- Savings are measured against counterfactual claims trend, so the number in the return on investment case depends heavily on the methodology chosen, and employers should insist on defining that methodology before signing rather than accepting the vendor own model.
Pricing, plan by plan
Gleamer
On request- Gleamer Copilot$undefined/year
- Priced per exam analysed or as an annual volume subscription
- Modules licensed individually or bundled as Copilot
- Cleared and CE marked indication differs per module and per market
Quantum Health
On request- Quantum Health$undefined/year
- Per employee per month, quoted not published
- Three tiers: Embold Plus, Quantum Flex and Quantum Signature
- Sold to self insured employers from roughly 500 employees upward
Which should you pick?
Choose Gleamer if
- You need boneview.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want chestview.
Choose Quantum Health if
- You need care coordinator pods.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want real time intercept.
Questions people ask
- Is Gleamer or Quantum Health better?
- Neither clearly leads. Gleamer starts at On request and Quantum Health at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Gleamer or Quantum Health?
- Gleamer starts at On request and Quantum Health at On request.
- Does Gleamer or Quantum Health run on more platforms?
- Gleamer runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise. Quantum Health runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Gleamer best used for?
- Gleamer is most often used for an emergency department where junior doctors read plain films before radiology review and missed fractures are a recurring incident theme, an urgent care network standardising musculoskeletal reading quality across sites with variable radiology cover, a paediatric service automating bone age assessment to remove a slow manual atlas comparison, an orthopaedic service that needs automated limb alignment and measurement before surgical planning rather than manual measurement on the workstation. Of those, an emergency department where junior doctors read plain films before radiology review and missed fractures are a recurring incident theme and an urgent care network standardising musculoskeletal reading quality across sites with variable radiology cover are not what Quantum Health is typically brought in for.
- What can Gleamer do that Quantum Health cannot?
- Gleamer covers BoneView, ChestView, BoneAge, BoneMetrics. Quantum Health covers Care coordinator pods, Real time intercept, Provider steering, Claims and benefits advocacy.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Gleamer: Who owns Gleamer?
RadNet agreed to acquire Gleamer in February 2026 for around two hundred and fifteen million euros upfront. RadNet also owns DeepHealth, a competing AI portfolio.
Quantum Health: Is there a minimum employer size?
Quantum works with self insured employers of around 500 employees and up. It does not publish a hard minimum, but the model does not fit small or fully insured groups.
Gleamer: Is BoneView FDA cleared?
Yes, BoneView holds 510(k) clearance including for paediatric fracture detection, but the cleared finding set is narrower than the CE marked indication in Europe.
Quantum Health: Does Quantum provide the medical care?
No. It navigates, coordinates and steers, but care is delivered by the network. That is the deliberate difference from vendors that own their own virtual clinicians.
Gleamer: What does the evidence actually show?
Multi-reader studies reported improved reader sensitivity for fracture detection and fewer false negatives, with the gain concentrated among less experienced readers in emergency settings.
Quantum Health: What are the tiers?
Embold Plus for carrier compatible navigation, Quantum Flex for modular capability selection, and Quantum Signature for deeper clinical, pharmacy and provider steering integration.
Gleamer: Can I buy just BoneView?
Yes, modules are licensed individually, though the commercial pitch is now the Copilot bundle across modalities.
Quantum Health: Is pricing published?
No. No rates, implementation fees or minimum lives are disclosed. Expect a fully custom quote based on headcount, plan complexity, carrier relationships and modules.
Related pages
More on Quantum Health
Other head to heads
- Gleamer vs Annalise.ai
- Gleamer vs Sectra
- Gleamer vs Rad AI
- Gleamer vs Lunit
- Gleamer vs Techcyte
- Gleamer vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Gleamer vs Visage Imaging
- Gleamer vs Paige
- Gleamer vs Therapixel
- Gleamer vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Gleamer vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Gleamer vs Hinge Health
- Gleamer vs Meru Health
- Gleamer vs NextGen Healthcare
- Gleamer vs Nookal
- Gleamer vs Open Dental
- Gleamer vs Oracle Clinical One
- Gleamer vs Phreesia
- Gleamer vs Included Health
- Gleamer vs Teladoc Health
- Gleamer vs Lyra Health
- Gleamer vs Koa Health
- Gleamer vs Ambra Health
- Gleamer vs SilverCloud by Amwell
- Gleamer vs DHIS2
- Gleamer vs Athenahealth
- Gleamer vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Gleamer vs Bahmni
- Gleamer vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Gleamer vs Carestream Dental
- Gleamer vs Cerner PowerChart
- Gleamer vs athenaOne
- Quantum Health vs Annalise.ai
- Quantum Health vs Sectra
- Quantum Health vs Rad AI
- Quantum Health vs Lunit
- Quantum Health vs Techcyte
- Quantum Health vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Quantum Health vs Visage Imaging
- Quantum Health vs Paige
- Quantum Health vs Therapixel
- Quantum Health vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Quantum Health vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Quantum Health vs Hinge Health
- Quantum Health vs Meru Health
- Quantum Health vs NextGen Healthcare
- Quantum Health vs Nookal
- Quantum Health vs Open Dental
- Quantum Health vs Oracle Clinical One
- Quantum Health vs Phreesia
- Quantum Health vs Included Health
- Quantum Health vs Teladoc Health
- Quantum Health vs Lyra Health
- Quantum Health vs Koa Health
- Quantum Health vs Ambra Health
- Quantum Health vs SilverCloud by Amwell
- Quantum Health vs DHIS2
- Quantum Health vs Athenahealth
- Quantum Health vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Quantum Health vs Bahmni
- Quantum Health vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Quantum Health vs Carestream Dental
- Quantum Health vs Cerner PowerChart
- Quantum Health vs athenaOne
