Healthcare · head to head
Fujifilm Synapse vs Gleamer

Fujifilm Synapse
Healthcare
Enterprise imaging platform covering PACS, VNA, cardiology and 3D from Fujifilm Healthcare
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Gleamer
Healthcare
CE marked and FDA cleared imaging AI suite for bone trauma and chest, now owned by RadNet
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fujifilm Synapse pACS, VNA, Cardiovascular and 3D are separately licensed and separately versioned, so an enterprise deployment means four upgrade cycles and four support relationships under one brand rather than one platform upgrade.; Gleamer radNet, an imaging provider that competes with many independent Gleamer customers, now owns the company and also owns the competing DeepHealth AI portfolio, so roadmap and pricing priorities are an open question for non-RadNet buyers.
- They diverge on capability: Fujifilm Synapse covers Synapse PACS, Gleamer covers BoneView.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fujifilm Synapse and Gleamer actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fujifilm Synapse | Gleamer |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Windows, iOS, Android | Web, Cloud, On-premise |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fujifilm Synapse
- Synapse PACS
- Synapse VNA
- Synapse Cardiovascular
- Synapse 3D
- Synapse Mobility
- Deconstructed PACS support
- Cloud services
Only in Gleamer
- BoneView
- ChestView
- BoneAge
- BoneMetrics
- LungCT and BoneCT
- BreastView
- Pixyl.Neuro
- Gleamer Copilot
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fujifilm Synapse
- A hospital replacing PACS that wants the archive decoupled from its scanner vendor so future modality purchases stay competitivenot Gleamer
- A health system consolidating radiology, cardiology, ophthalmology and wound images into one vendor neutral archive with a single retention policynot Gleamer
- An outpatient imaging chain that needs one worklist across multiple sites and radiologists reading remotelynot Gleamer
- A site pursuing a deconstructed PACS strategy that wants to replace the viewer later without touching the archivenot Gleamer
Gleamer
- An emergency department where junior doctors read plain films before radiology review and missed fractures are a recurring incident themenot Fujifilm Synapse
- An urgent care network standardising musculoskeletal reading quality across sites with variable radiology covernot Fujifilm Synapse
- A paediatric service automating bone age assessment to remove a slow manual atlas comparisonnot Fujifilm Synapse
- An orthopaedic service that needs automated limb alignment and measurement before surgical planning rather than manual measurement on the workstationnot Fujifilm Synapse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fujifilm Synapse
- PACS, VNA, Cardiovascular and 3D are separately licensed and separately versioned, so an enterprise deployment means four upgrade cycles and four support relationships under one brand rather than one platform upgrade.
- Synapse 3D is licensed by concurrent user and sized from average concurrency, which leaves radiologists queued for advanced visualisation at the morning reading peak and forces an unplanned licence purchase.
- As an independent informatics vendor Fujifilm has less privileged access to proprietary modality data than Philips or Siemens have on their own scanners, so some vendor specific post processing is not available.
- The vendor neutral archive absorbs non DICOM object types only after per specialty configuration work, and departments such as ophthalmology and dermatology usually need bespoke ingestion projects that were not in the original scope.
- Migrating a decade of priors from a legacy archive is a large professional services line that Fujifilm quotes separately, and these migrations regularly run past the contracted go live date.
Gleamer
- RadNet, an imaging provider that competes with many independent Gleamer customers, now owns the company and also owns the competing DeepHealth AI portfolio, so roadmap and pricing priorities are an open question for non-RadNet buyers.
- The measured benefit is largest for less experienced readers, so a specialist musculoskeletal service will see far less improvement than the published reader studies suggest.
- Cleared indications differ per module and per market, and the FDA cleared set is narrower than the CE marked European set, so an American buyer cannot rely on European reference sites.
- Each additional module adds alert volume into the same worklist, and departments running several Gleamer algorithms report needing local threshold tuning to keep radiologist trust.
- Pricing is per exam and not published, which makes budgeting difficult for an emergency department whose plain film volume swings seasonally.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fujifilm Synapse
On request- Synapse$undefined/year
- Each module licensed separately: PACS, VNA, Cardiovascular, 3D
- Priced by annual study volume and concurrent diagnostic users
- Synapse 3D licensed by concurrent user, separate from PACS
Gleamer
On request- Gleamer Copilot$undefined/year
- Priced per exam analysed or as an annual volume subscription
- Modules licensed individually or bundled as Copilot
- Cleared and CE marked indication differs per module and per market
Which should you pick?
Choose Fujifilm Synapse if
- You need synapse pacs.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want synapse vna.
Choose Gleamer if
- You need boneview.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want chestview.
Questions people ask
- Is Fujifilm Synapse or Gleamer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fujifilm Synapse starts at On request and Gleamer at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fujifilm Synapse or Gleamer?
- Fujifilm Synapse starts at On request and Gleamer at On request.
- Does Fujifilm Synapse or Gleamer run on more platforms?
- Fujifilm Synapse runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android. Gleamer runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- What is Fujifilm Synapse best used for?
- Fujifilm Synapse is most often used for a hospital replacing pacs that wants the archive decoupled from its scanner vendor so future modality purchases stay competitive, a health system consolidating radiology, cardiology, ophthalmology and wound images into one vendor neutral archive with a single retention policy, an outpatient imaging chain that needs one worklist across multiple sites and radiologists reading remotely, a site pursuing a deconstructed pacs strategy that wants to replace the viewer later without touching the archive. Of those, a hospital replacing pacs that wants the archive decoupled from its scanner vendor so future modality purchases stay competitive and a health system consolidating radiology, cardiology, ophthalmology and wound images into one vendor neutral archive with a single retention policy are not what Gleamer is typically brought in for.
- What can Fujifilm Synapse do that Gleamer cannot?
- Fujifilm Synapse covers Synapse PACS, Synapse VNA, Synapse Cardiovascular, Synapse 3D. Gleamer covers BoneView, ChestView, BoneAge, BoneMetrics.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fujifilm Synapse: Is Synapse one product or several?
Several. Synapse PACS, Synapse VNA, Synapse Cardiovascular and Synapse 3D are separately licensed products under one brand. Price and scope each one individually.
Gleamer: Who owns Gleamer?
RadNet agreed to acquire Gleamer in February 2026 for around two hundred and fifteen million euros upfront. RadNet also owns DeepHealth, a competing AI portfolio.
Fujifilm Synapse: Do I have to buy Fujifilm scanners?
No. Fujifilm sells Synapse independently of imaging hardware, which is a large part of why it wins competitive PACS replacements at mixed fleet sites.
Gleamer: Is BoneView FDA cleared?
Yes, BoneView holds 510(k) clearance including for paediatric fracture detection, but the cleared finding set is narrower than the CE marked indication in Europe.
Fujifilm Synapse: Does Synapse publish pricing?
No. Pricing is quoted by study volume, concurrent users, module mix and storage capacity.
Gleamer: What does the evidence actually show?
Multi-reader studies reported improved reader sensitivity for fracture detection and fewer false negatives, with the gain concentrated among less experienced readers in emergency settings.
Fujifilm Synapse: Can Synapse VNA store non radiology images?
Yes, including visible light, ophthalmology and wound photography, but each specialty typically needs its own ingestion and metadata configuration project.
Gleamer: Can I buy just BoneView?
Yes, modules are licensed individually, though the commercial pitch is now the Copilot bundle across modalities.
Related pages
More on Fujifilm Synapse
Other head to heads
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Ambra Health
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Epic Systems
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Sectra
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Visage Imaging
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Rad AI
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Annalise.ai
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Nookal
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Lunit
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Flo
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Talkspace
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Practice Fusion
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Ro
- Fujifilm Synapse vs RXNT
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Signant Health
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Sysmex
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Techcyte
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Paige
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Therapixel
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Hinge Health
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Meru Health
- Fujifilm Synapse vs NextGen Healthcare
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Open Dental
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Oracle Clinical One
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Phreesia
- Gleamer vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Gleamer vs Ambra Health
- Gleamer vs Epic Systems
- Gleamer vs Sectra
- Gleamer vs Visage Imaging
- Gleamer vs Rad AI
- Gleamer vs Annalise.ai
- Gleamer vs Nookal
- Gleamer vs Lunit
- Gleamer vs Flo
- Gleamer vs Talkspace
- Gleamer vs Practice Fusion
- Gleamer vs Ro
- Gleamer vs RXNT
- Gleamer vs Signant Health
- Gleamer vs Sysmex
- Gleamer vs Techcyte
- Gleamer vs Paige
- Gleamer vs Therapixel
- Gleamer vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Gleamer vs Hinge Health
- Gleamer vs Meru Health
- Gleamer vs NextGen Healthcare
- Gleamer vs Open Dental
- Gleamer vs Oracle Clinical One
- Gleamer vs Phreesia
