Software · head to head
Fyle vs Paragon

Fyle
Software
Real-time expense management that works with your cards
- From
- $29/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fyle billed per active user, defined as anyone who creates an expense or has a connected card with transactions in the month, so headcount does not predict the bill; Paragon no price is published for either plan, and both require a quote
- They diverge on capability: Fyle covers Real-time card tracking, Paragon covers Embedded workflows.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fyle and Paragon actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fyle
- Real-time card tracking
- Automatic receipt matching
- Expense policies
- Approval workflows
- Mileage tracking
- QuickBooks
- Xero
- Sage Intacct
Only in Paragon
- Embedded workflows
- Native integrations
- Workflow builder
- Error handling
- Monitoring
- Analytics
- Webhooks
- 500+ apps
Both cover
- Slack
- GDPR
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fyle
- Expense reporting and corporate card reconciliationnot Paragon
- Enforcing spend policy and approvals before reimbursementnot Paragon
Paragon
- Embedding third party integrations into a SaaS productnot Fyle
- Managing customer facing connectors without building each onenot Fyle
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fyle
- Billed per active user, defined as anyone who creates an expense or has a connected card with transactions in the month, so headcount does not predict the bill
- The Growth plan carries a 5 user minimum and the Business plan a 10 user minimum, so the entry cost is set by the floor rather than the team
- API access and the Sage Intacct and NetSuite integrations require a paid tier
- ACH reimbursements and project expense tracking sit above the entry plan
- Both published plans are billed annually
- Enterprise pricing is custom and aimed at organisations with 250 or more employees
Paragon
- No price is published for either plan, and both require a quote
- Cost scales with the number of customer tenants using the integrations, so the bill follows an end customer count rather than the vendor's own usage
- SAML SSO, self hosting, dynamic field mapping and SLAs are all Enterprise only
Pricing, plan by plan
Fyle
$29/month- Standard$8/month
- Real-time card feeds
- Receipt matching
- Basic approvals
- Business$12/month
- Advanced policies
- Custom workflows
- Analytics
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited users
- API access
- Priority support
Paragon
$299/month- Starter$299/month
- 50 integrations
- Basic support
- Growth$999/month
- 200 integrations
- Priority support
- Enterprise$5000/month
- Unlimited integrations
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Fyle if
- You need real-time card tracking.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want automatic receipt matching.
Choose Paragon if
- You need embedded workflows.
- You work on Web, Embedded.
- You also want native integrations.
Questions people ask
- Is Fyle or Paragon better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fyle starts at $29/month and Paragon at $299/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fyle or Paragon?
- Fyle starts at $29/month and Paragon at $299/month.
- Does Fyle or Paragon run on more platforms?
- Fyle runs on Web, Ios, Android. Paragon runs on Web, Embedded.
- What is Fyle best used for?
- Fyle is most often used for expense reporting and corporate card reconciliation, enforcing spend policy and approvals before reimbursement. Of those, expense reporting and corporate card reconciliation and enforcing spend policy and approvals before reimbursement are not what Paragon is typically brought in for.
- What can Fyle do that Paragon cannot?
- Fyle covers Real-time card tracking, Automatic receipt matching, Expense policies, Approval workflows. Paragon covers Embedded workflows, Native integrations, Workflow builder, Error handling. Both handle Slack, GDPR, Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Fyle vs QuickBooks
- Fyle vs Ramp
- Fyle vs Airbase
- Fyle vs Melio
- Fyle vs Wise Business
- Fyle vs ADP
- Fyle vs Brex
- Fyle vs Expensify
- Fyle vs Payoneer
- Fyle vs Pleo
- Fyle vs Sage 50
- Fyle vs SAP Concur
- Fyle vs Spendesk
- Fyle vs Stampli
- Fyle vs Tipalti
- Fyle vs Xero
- Fyle vs Zoho Books
- Fyle vs Adyen
- Fyle vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Fyle vs n8n
- Fyle vs Zapier
- Fyle vs MuleSoft
- Fyle vs Parabola
- Fyle vs Zapier Plus
- Fyle vs Jitterbit
- Fyle vs mParticle
- Fyle vs RudderStack
- Fyle vs Workato
- Fyle vs Airbyte
- Fyle vs Automate.io
- Fyle vs Boomi
- Fyle vs Browser Use
- Fyle vs Browserbase
- Fyle vs Celigo
- Fyle vs Census
- Fyle vs CrewAI
- Paragon vs QuickBooks
- Paragon vs Ramp
- Paragon vs Airbase
- Paragon vs Melio
- Paragon vs Wise Business
- Paragon vs ADP
- Paragon vs Brex
- Paragon vs Expensify
- Paragon vs Payoneer
- Paragon vs Pleo
- Paragon vs Sage 50
- Paragon vs SAP Concur
- Paragon vs Spendesk
- Paragon vs Stampli
- Paragon vs Tipalti
- Paragon vs Xero
- Paragon vs Zoho Books
- Paragon vs Adyen
- Paragon vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Paragon vs n8n
- Paragon vs Zapier
- Paragon vs MuleSoft
- Paragon vs Parabola
- Paragon vs Zapier Plus
- Paragon vs Jitterbit
- Paragon vs mParticle
- Paragon vs RudderStack
- Paragon vs Workato
- Paragon vs Airbyte
- Paragon vs Automate.io
- Paragon vs Boomi
- Paragon vs Browser Use
- Paragon vs Browserbase
- Paragon vs Celigo
- Paragon vs Census
- Paragon vs CrewAI

