Healthcare · head to head
Fujifilm Synapse vs NextGen Enterprise EHR

Fujifilm Synapse
Healthcare
Enterprise imaging platform covering PACS, VNA, cardiology and 3D from Fujifilm Healthcare
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

NextGen Enterprise EHR
Healthcare
Enterprise-grade EHR and RCM for large healthcare organizations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fujifilm Synapse pACS, VNA, Cardiovascular and 3D are separately licensed and separately versioned, so an enterprise deployment means four upgrade cycles and four support relationships under one brand rather than one platform upgrade.; NextGen Enterprise EHR no pricing published on website
- They diverge on capability: Fujifilm Synapse covers Synapse PACS, NextGen Enterprise EHR covers Electronic Health Records.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fujifilm Synapse and NextGen Enterprise EHR actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fujifilm Synapse | NextGen Enterprise EHR |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Windows, iOS, Android | Web, Desktop |
| Founded | Unknown | 1997 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fujifilm Synapse
- Synapse PACS
- Synapse VNA
- Synapse Cardiovascular
- Synapse 3D
- Synapse Mobility
- Deconstructed PACS support
- Cloud services
Only in NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Electronic Health Records
- Clinical Documentation
- Revenue Cycle Management
- Patient Management
- Analytics
- Interoperability
- Reporting
- HL7
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fujifilm Synapse
- A hospital replacing PACS that wants the archive decoupled from its scanner vendor so future modality purchases stay competitivenot NextGen Enterprise EHR
- A health system consolidating radiology, cardiology, ophthalmology and wound images into one vendor neutral archive with a single retention policynot NextGen Enterprise EHR
- An outpatient imaging chain that needs one worklist across multiple sites and radiologists reading remotelynot NextGen Enterprise EHR
- A site pursuing a deconstructed PACS strategy that wants to replace the viewer later without touching the archivenot NextGen Enterprise EHR
NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Patient Carenot Fujifilm Synapse
- Medical Recordsnot Fujifilm Synapse
- Practice Managementnot Fujifilm Synapse
- Telehealthnot Fujifilm Synapse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fujifilm Synapse
- PACS, VNA, Cardiovascular and 3D are separately licensed and separately versioned, so an enterprise deployment means four upgrade cycles and four support relationships under one brand rather than one platform upgrade.
- Synapse 3D is licensed by concurrent user and sized from average concurrency, which leaves radiologists queued for advanced visualisation at the morning reading peak and forces an unplanned licence purchase.
- As an independent informatics vendor Fujifilm has less privileged access to proprietary modality data than Philips or Siemens have on their own scanners, so some vendor specific post processing is not available.
- The vendor neutral archive absorbs non DICOM object types only after per specialty configuration work, and departments such as ophthalmology and dermatology usually need bespoke ingestion projects that were not in the original scope.
- Migrating a decade of priors from a legacy archive is a large professional services line that Fujifilm quotes separately, and these migrations regularly run past the contracted go live date.
NextGen Enterprise EHR
- No pricing published on website
Pricing, plan by plan
Fujifilm Synapse
On request- Synapse$undefined/year
- Each module licensed separately: PACS, VNA, Cardiovascular, 3D
- Priced by annual study volume and concurrent diagnostic users
- Synapse 3D licensed by concurrent user, separate from PACS
NextGen Enterprise EHR
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the NextGen Enterprise EHR review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Fujifilm Synapse if
- You need synapse pacs.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want synapse vna.
Choose NextGen Enterprise EHR if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Web, Desktop.
- You also want clinical documentation.
Questions people ask
- Is Fujifilm Synapse or NextGen Enterprise EHR better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fujifilm Synapse starts at On request and NextGen Enterprise EHR at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fujifilm Synapse or NextGen Enterprise EHR?
- Fujifilm Synapse starts at On request and NextGen Enterprise EHR at On request.
- Does Fujifilm Synapse or NextGen Enterprise EHR run on more platforms?
- Fujifilm Synapse runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android. NextGen Enterprise EHR runs on Web, Desktop.
- What is Fujifilm Synapse best used for?
- Fujifilm Synapse is most often used for a hospital replacing pacs that wants the archive decoupled from its scanner vendor so future modality purchases stay competitive, a health system consolidating radiology, cardiology, ophthalmology and wound images into one vendor neutral archive with a single retention policy, an outpatient imaging chain that needs one worklist across multiple sites and radiologists reading remotely, a site pursuing a deconstructed pacs strategy that wants to replace the viewer later without touching the archive. Of those, a hospital replacing pacs that wants the archive decoupled from its scanner vendor so future modality purchases stay competitive and a health system consolidating radiology, cardiology, ophthalmology and wound images into one vendor neutral archive with a single retention policy are not what NextGen Enterprise EHR is typically brought in for.
- What can Fujifilm Synapse do that NextGen Enterprise EHR cannot?
- Fujifilm Synapse covers Synapse PACS, Synapse VNA, Synapse Cardiovascular, Synapse 3D. NextGen Enterprise EHR covers Electronic Health Records, Clinical Documentation, Revenue Cycle Management, Patient Management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fujifilm Synapse: Is Synapse one product or several?
Several. Synapse PACS, Synapse VNA, Synapse Cardiovascular and Synapse 3D are separately licensed products under one brand. Price and scope each one individually.
NextGen Enterprise EHR: What is NextGen Enterprise EHR pricing?
NextGen Healthcare does not publish pricing for its Enterprise solutions on their website. The company uses a consultative sales model where pricing is determined after understanding specific practice requirements and needed features.
SourceFujifilm Synapse: Do I have to buy Fujifilm scanners?
No. Fujifilm sells Synapse independently of imaging hardware, which is a large part of why it wins competitive PACS replacements at mixed fleet sites.
Fujifilm Synapse: Does Synapse publish pricing?
No. Pricing is quoted by study volume, concurrent users, module mix and storage capacity.
Fujifilm Synapse: Can Synapse VNA store non radiology images?
Yes, including visible light, ophthalmology and wound photography, but each specialty typically needs its own ingestion and metadata configuration project.
Related pages
More on Fujifilm Synapse
More on NextGen Enterprise EHR
Other head to heads
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Ambra Health
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Epic Systems
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Sectra
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Visage Imaging
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Rad AI
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Gleamer
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Annalise.ai
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Nookal
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Lunit
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Flo
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Talkspace
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Practice Fusion
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Ro
- Fujifilm Synapse vs RXNT
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Signant Health
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Sysmex
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Cerner
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Meditech
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Athenahealth
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Amwell
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Allscripts
- Fujifilm Synapse vs DrChrono
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Kareo
- Fujifilm Synapse vs ChiroTouch
- Fujifilm Synapse vs eClinicalWorks
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Ginger
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Koa Health
- Fujifilm Synapse vs OpenMRS
- Fujifilm Synapse vs SilverCloud by Amwell
- Fujifilm Synapse vs WebPT
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Ambra Health
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Epic Systems
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Sectra
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Visage Imaging
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Rad AI
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Gleamer
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Annalise.ai
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Nookal
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Lunit
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Flo
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Talkspace
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Practice Fusion
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Ro
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs RXNT
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Signant Health
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Sysmex
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Cerner
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Meditech
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Athenahealth
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Amwell
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Allscripts
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs DrChrono
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Kareo
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs ChiroTouch
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs eClinicalWorks
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Ginger
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs Koa Health
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs OpenMRS
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs SilverCloud by Amwell
- NextGen Enterprise EHR vs WebPT
