Nonprofits · head to head
Foundant Technologies vs Qgiv

Foundant Technologies
Nonprofits
Grant lifecycle management for foundations, with public subscription bands and a two-year term
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Foundant Technologies the Basic licence tier omits eligibility quizzes and advanced automation and caps file sizes, so foundations with conditional application logic must buy up rather than configure around it.; Qgiv qgiv has been renamed Bloomerang Fundraising and qgiv.com/pricing now redirects to bloomerang.com/pricing
- They diverge on capability: Foundant Technologies covers Grant Lifecycle Manager, Qgiv covers Online donation forms.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Foundant Technologies and Qgiv actually diverge.
| Attribute | Foundant Technologies | Qgiv |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $40/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web | Web, IOS, Android |
| Founded | Unknown | 2007 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Nonprofits).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Foundant Technologies
- Grant Lifecycle Manager
- CommunitySuite
- Scholarship Lifecycle Manager
- Candid integration
- Evaluator portal
- Grantee portal
Only in Qgiv
- Online donation forms
- Peer-to-peer fundraising
- Event registration
- Text-to-give
- Auction management
- Salesforce
- Blackbaud
- Mailchimp
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Foundant Technologies
- A private foundation making 50 to 500 grants a year that wants a defined process rather than a configuration projectnot Qgiv
- A community foundation needing donor-advised fund accounting and grantmaking from the same vendornot Qgiv
- Running a scholarship programme with volunteer review committees who should not have full staff loginsnot Qgiv
- A foundation that needs charity status verification against Candid data before every payment goes outnot Qgiv
Qgiv
- Nonprofit fundraisingnot Foundant Technologies
- Donor relationship managementnot Foundant Technologies
- Volunteer managementnot Foundant Technologies
- Church givingnot Foundant Technologies
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Foundant Technologies
- The Basic licence tier omits eligibility quizzes and advanced automation and caps file sizes, so foundations with conditional application logic must buy up rather than configure around it.
- The standard contract is two years, which removes the option of a one-year trial period and locks you in before you know whether the process fits.
- The annual subscription excludes implementation, and the setup fee is a meaningful additional first-year cost that quotes do not always foreground.
- It is deliberately less configurable than enterprise grants systems, so a funder with unusual multi-stage workflows will hit walls that require process change rather than software change.
- Pricing above the standard bands switches to an assets under management basis, meaning a well-endowed foundation making few grants can be quoted far more than its grant volume would suggest.
Qgiv
- Qgiv has been renamed Bloomerang Fundraising and qgiv.com/pricing now redirects to bloomerang.com/pricing
- The fundraising product starts at $40 per month billed annually but must be purchased as part of a bundle with Bloomerang CRM, which itself starts at $125 per month
- All published prices are billed annually with no monthly billing option shown
- The full Giving Platform starts at $242 per month billed annually
- Every listed price is a starting price and the page directs buyers to Contact Sales for actual pricing
Pricing, plan by plan
Foundant Technologies
On request- Grant Lifecycle Manager$undefined/year
- Three licence tiers gating automation and eligibility quizzes
- Two-year contract standard
- Reported range of roughly 4,250 to 9,500 USD per year
- CommunitySuite$undefined/year
- Fund accounting and donor-advised funds
- Priced for community foundations by fund count and complexity
- Scholarship Lifecycle Manager$undefined/year
- Scholarship application and review workflows
- Sold alongside or independently of GLM
Qgiv
$40/month- Bloomerang Fundraising$40/month
- Donation forms
- Events
- Mobile apps
- Bloomerang CRM$125/month
- Donor management
- Predictive insights
- Marketing automation
- Bloomerang Volunteer$119/month
- Volunteer recruitment
- Scheduling
- Communications
- The Giving Platform (All-in-One)$242/month
- Fundraising, CRM, Volunteer management all included
- Prospect AI
- Predictive insights
Which should you pick?
Choose Foundant Technologies if
- You need grant lifecycle manager.
- You also want communitysuite.
Choose Qgiv if
- You need online donation forms.
- You work on Web, IOS, Android.
- You also want peer-to-peer fundraising.
Questions people ask
- Is Foundant Technologies or Qgiv better?
- Neither clearly leads. Foundant Technologies starts at On request and Qgiv at $40/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Foundant Technologies or Qgiv?
- Foundant Technologies starts at On request and Qgiv at $40/month.
- Does Foundant Technologies or Qgiv run on more platforms?
- Foundant Technologies runs on Web. Qgiv runs on Web, IOS, Android.
- What is Foundant Technologies best used for?
- Foundant Technologies is most often used for a private foundation making 50 to 500 grants a year that wants a defined process rather than a configuration project, a community foundation needing donor-advised fund accounting and grantmaking from the same vendor, running a scholarship programme with volunteer review committees who should not have full staff logins, a foundation that needs charity status verification against candid data before every payment goes out. Of those, a private foundation making 50 to 500 grants a year that wants a defined process rather than a configuration project and a community foundation needing donor-advised fund accounting and grantmaking from the same vendor are not what Qgiv is typically brought in for.
- What can Foundant Technologies do that Qgiv cannot?
- Foundant Technologies covers Grant Lifecycle Manager, CommunitySuite, Scholarship Lifecycle Manager, Candid integration. Qgiv covers Online donation forms, Peer-to-peer fundraising, Event registration, Text-to-give.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Foundant Technologies: What does Grant Lifecycle Manager cost?
Sector guides report roughly 4,250 to 9,500 US dollars a year on a two-year contract, with larger foundations priced on assets under management. Foundant does not publish these figures itself.
Qgiv: How much does QGIV cost?
QGIV's website redirects to Bloomerang, which offers pricing starting at $40/month for Fundraising, $119/month for Volunteer, $125/month for CRM, or $242/month for the all-in-one Giving Platform.
SourceFoundant Technologies: Is implementation included?
No. Setup is billed separately from the annual subscription.
Qgiv: What is Bloomerang's pricing model?
Bloomerang uses constituent-based pricing where costs scale with the number of records/contacts in your database, not per user. All plans include unlimited users.
SourceFoundant Technologies: Is the Candid integration extra?
It is included in the GLM subscription and free for up to 1,000 charity checks a year.
Qgiv: What does the Giving Platform include?
The Giving Platform at $242/month (billed annually) is an all-in-one solution including fundraising, CRM, volunteer management, Prospect AI, and predictive insights with unlimited users.
SourceFoundant Technologies: Is there a discount for small funders?
Some sector associations, including Exponent Philanthropy, negotiate a discount off the initial licence for members.
Related pages
More on Foundant Technologies
Other head to heads
- Foundant Technologies vs GuideStar
- Foundant Technologies vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- Foundant Technologies vs Fluxx
- Foundant Technologies vs Blackbaud Grantmaking
- Foundant Technologies vs SmartSimple Cloud
- Foundant Technologies vs Submittable
- Foundant Technologies vs Aplos
- Foundant Technologies vs Candid
- Foundant Technologies vs GrantStation
- Foundant Technologies vs Give Lively
- Foundant Technologies vs OpenGrants
- Foundant Technologies vs Instrumentl
- Foundant Technologies vs Trello for Nonprofits
- Foundant Technologies vs VolunteerHub
- Foundant Technologies vs Zeffy
- Foundant Technologies vs Wild Apricot
- Foundant Technologies vs DonorPerfect
- Foundant Technologies vs Glue Up
- Foundant Technologies vs GiveSmart
- Foundant Technologies vs Classy
- Foundant Technologies vs Donorbox
- Foundant Technologies vs GiveWP
- Foundant Technologies vs Constant Contact
- Foundant Technologies vs Handbid
- Foundant Technologies vs Raisely
- Foundant Technologies vs MobileCause
- Foundant Technologies vs Fundraise Up
- Foundant Technologies vs OneCause
- Foundant Technologies vs Apptio Monetize
- Foundant Technologies vs Bloomerang Volunteer
- Qgiv vs GuideStar
- Qgiv vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- Qgiv vs Fluxx
- Qgiv vs Blackbaud Grantmaking
- Qgiv vs SmartSimple Cloud
- Qgiv vs Submittable
- Qgiv vs Aplos
- Qgiv vs Candid
- Qgiv vs GrantStation
- Qgiv vs Give Lively
- Qgiv vs OpenGrants
- Qgiv vs Instrumentl
- Qgiv vs Trello for Nonprofits
- Qgiv vs VolunteerHub
- Qgiv vs Zeffy
- Qgiv vs Wild Apricot
- Qgiv vs DonorPerfect
- Qgiv vs Glue Up
- Qgiv vs GiveSmart
- Qgiv vs Classy
- Qgiv vs Donorbox
- Qgiv vs GiveWP
- Qgiv vs Constant Contact
- Qgiv vs Handbid
- Qgiv vs Raisely
- Qgiv vs MobileCause
- Qgiv vs Fundraise Up
- Qgiv vs OneCause
- Qgiv vs Apptio Monetize
- Qgiv vs Bloomerang Volunteer

