APIs · head to head
Fintech Farm vs Toqio

Fintech Farm
APIs
"Neobank in a box" for banks in emerging markets, paid on a performance basis
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Toqio
APIs
No code platform for building embedded finance products on your own providers
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fintech Farm the performance-based model means a bank is entering an ongoing revenue-sharing relationship rather than buying a one-time or fixed-fee software licence, which changes long-term cost dynamics as the neobank grows.; Toqio toqio holds no licence and provides no sponsor bank, so you must find, contract and manage regulated providers yourself, which is the slowest part of any embedded finance launch.
- They diverge on capability: Fintech Farm covers End-to-end neobank stack, Toqio covers No code product builder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fintech Farm and Toqio actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fintech Farm | Toqio |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android, API |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fintech Farm
- End-to-end neobank stack
- Credit scoring engines
- Debit, credit and BNPL products
- Investment features
- Performance-based partnership
- Emerging market focus
Only in Toqio
- No code product builder
- Provider orchestration
- Account and card modules
- Embedded financing
- Back office tooling
- Multi entity and multi brand
- White label mobile apps
- Marketplace of providers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fintech Farm
- A mid-sized regulated bank in an emerging market wanting to launch a neobank without building digital product expertise in housenot Toqio
- A bank wanting a partner compensated on growth outcomes rather than a fixed software licencenot Toqio
- An institution needing credit scoring built specifically for thin-file, underbanked emerging market customersnot Toqio
- A bank expanding into a new emerging market and wanting a proven neobank launch playbook rather than starting from scratchnot Toqio
Toqio
- A manufacturer offering branded working capital finance to its dealer networknot Fintech Farm
- A B2B marketplace launching accounts and cards for its sellers without becoming regulated itselfnot Fintech Farm
- A corporate that wants to switch card issuer without rebuilding its customer facing productnot Fintech Farm
- A group launching the same embedded finance product across several markets with different local providersnot Fintech Farm
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fintech Farm
- The performance-based model means a bank is entering an ongoing revenue-sharing relationship rather than buying a one-time or fixed-fee software licence, which changes long-term cost dynamics as the neobank grows.
- It requires the partner bank to already hold a banking licence and balance sheet, so it is not usable by a company wanting to launch banking services without any existing regulatory status.
- Focus on emerging markets means less proven track record in developed, heavily regulated markets such as the US or Western Europe.
- As a smaller, founder-led company relative to Mambu or Temenos, its longevity and ability to support partner banks over a decade-plus relationship carries more vendor-risk uncertainty.
- Being compensated on customer and revenue growth creates a natural incentive to prioritise growth-driving features over, for example, deep compliance tooling that does not directly move those metrics.
Toqio
- Toqio holds no licence and provides no sponsor bank, so you must find, contract and manage regulated providers yourself, which is the slowest part of any embedded finance launch.
- Because it orchestrates rather than provides, the customer experience is only as good as the underlying bank or issuer, and Toqio cannot fix a partner's settlement delays or outages.
- Pricing is quoted with no public rate card, so comparing it against building in house or against a bundled banking as a service provider requires a full sales process.
- With around EUR 30 million raised in total it is a small supplier to underpin a financial product a large corporate expects to run for a decade, which raises real continuity questions in procurement.
- No code configuration covers standard patterns well but bespoke customer journeys eventually require custom development, at which point the main advantage over building directly on provider APIs narrows.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fintech Farm
On request- Fintech Farm$undefined/year
- Performance-based compensation tied to customer numbers and revenue generated
- No published flat licence fee
Toqio
On request- Toqio platform$undefined/year
- Quoted per customer, typically setup plus recurring platform fee
- Regulated provider fees are separate and contracted by you
- Card interchange and lending economics belong to your provider agreements
Which should you pick?
Choose Fintech Farm if
- You need end-to-end neobank stack.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want credit scoring engines.
Choose Toqio if
- You need no code product builder.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want provider orchestration.
Questions people ask
- Is Fintech Farm or Toqio better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fintech Farm starts at On request and Toqio at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fintech Farm or Toqio?
- Fintech Farm starts at On request and Toqio at On request.
- Does Fintech Farm or Toqio run on more platforms?
- Fintech Farm runs on Web, iOS, Android. Toqio runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- What is Fintech Farm best used for?
- Fintech Farm is most often used for a mid-sized regulated bank in an emerging market wanting to launch a neobank without building digital product expertise in house, a bank wanting a partner compensated on growth outcomes rather than a fixed software licence, an institution needing credit scoring built specifically for thin-file, underbanked emerging market customers, a bank expanding into a new emerging market and wanting a proven neobank launch playbook rather than starting from scratch. Of those, a mid-sized regulated bank in an emerging market wanting to launch a neobank without building digital product expertise in house and a bank wanting a partner compensated on growth outcomes rather than a fixed software licence are not what Toqio is typically brought in for.
- What can Fintech Farm do that Toqio cannot?
- Fintech Farm covers End-to-end neobank stack, Credit scoring engines, Debit, credit and BNPL products, Investment features. Toqio covers No code product builder, Provider orchestration, Account and card modules, Embedded financing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fintech Farm: How is Fintech Farm paid?
On a performance basis, tied to the number of customers and revenue its neobank product generates for the partner bank, rather than a flat licence fee.
Toqio: Does Toqio provide the banking licence?
No, deliberately. You contract your own bank, issuer or lender, which is why you can replace them without rebuilding the product.
Fintech Farm: Does the bank need its own licence?
Yes, Fintech Farm partners with banks that already hold a banking licence and balance sheet; it does not provide the licence itself.
Toqio: Who is it aimed at?
Large corporates and B2B ecosystem operators embedding finance for suppliers, dealers or marketplace sellers, not consumer fintech startups.
Fintech Farm: Which markets does it focus on?
Emerging markets, including operations across regions such as Vietnam, Nigeria and increasingly India.
Toqio: How much does it cost?
Not published. Expect a setup fee plus a recurring platform fee, with all regulated provider costs on top and separately contracted.
Related pages
More on Fintech Farm
Other head to heads
- Fintech Farm vs Mambu
- Fintech Farm vs Tuum
- Fintech Farm vs Swan
- Fintech Farm vs Vodeno
- Fintech Farm vs Treasury Prime
- Fintech Farm vs Griffin
- Fintech Farm vs Weavr
- Fintech Farm vs Solaris
- Fintech Farm vs Synctera
- Fintech Farm vs Unit
- Fintech Farm vs Paymentology
- Fintech Farm vs Treblle
- Fintech Farm vs Tribe Payments
- Fintech Farm vs Trustly
- Fintech Farm vs Highnote
- Fintech Farm vs Thredd
- Fintech Farm vs Lithic
- Fintech Farm vs Column
- Fintech Farm vs Astra
- Fintech Farm vs Marqeta
- Fintech Farm vs Meniga
- Fintech Farm vs Moov
- Fintech Farm vs MX Technologies
- Fintech Farm vs PubNub
- Fintech Farm vs Skaleet
- Toqio vs Mambu
- Toqio vs Tuum
- Toqio vs Swan
- Toqio vs Vodeno
- Toqio vs Treasury Prime
- Toqio vs Griffin
- Toqio vs Weavr
- Toqio vs Solaris
- Toqio vs Synctera
- Toqio vs Unit
- Toqio vs Paymentology
- Toqio vs Treblle
- Toqio vs Tribe Payments
- Toqio vs Trustly
- Toqio vs Highnote
- Toqio vs Thredd
- Toqio vs Lithic
- Toqio vs Column
- Toqio vs Astra
- Toqio vs Marqeta
- Toqio vs Meniga
- Toqio vs Moov
- Toqio vs MX Technologies
- Toqio vs PubNub
- Toqio vs Skaleet
