Legal · head to head
Didomi vs Filevine

Didomi
Legal
Google-certified and IAB TCF consent management across web, mobile and connected TV
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Filevine
Legal
Configurable case management for plaintiff litigation, intake and mass tort firms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Didomi pricing is based on monthly unique visitors and is not published, so a large publisher cannot estimate cost before entering a sales process, and traffic spikes translate directly into billing surprises.; Filevine there is no built-in general ledger or three-way trust reconciliation, so the firm still pays for and reconciles QuickBooks separately, which undermines the single-system argument used during the sale.
- They diverge on capability: Didomi covers Google CMP certification, Filevine covers Project templates.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Didomi and Filevine actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Didomi
- Google CMP certification
- IAB TCF support
- Connected TV and OTT
- Mobile SDKs
- Consent proof storage
- Preference centre
- Consent analytics
- Global privacy regimes
Only in Filevine
- Project templates
- Lead Docket intake
- Document assembly
- Vinesign
- Case texting
- Reporting and dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Didomi
- A European publisher whose Google Ad Manager revenue is withheld without a Google-certified CMP integrated with Consent Modenot Filevine
- A broadcaster collecting consent on connected TV apps, where certified CMP options are very limitednot Filevine
- A multinational advertiser needing one consent signal honoured consistently across web, iOS and Android propertiesnot Filevine
- A group that must produce consent evidence to a data protection authority following a complaintnot Filevine
Filevine
- A personal injury firm that wants advertising spend, intake conversion and settlement value reported in one placenot Didomi
- A mass tort practice managing thousands of claimants against shared case phases and bulk document generationnot Didomi
- A firm replacing spreadsheets and shared drives where each practice area has different deadline rulesnot Didomi
- An immigration or workers compensation practice that needs form-heavy document assembly from case datanot Didomi
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Didomi
- Pricing is based on monthly unique visitors and is not published, so a large publisher cannot estimate cost before entering a sales process, and traffic spikes translate directly into billing surprises.
- Consent banners depress measurable traffic by design, and Didomi cannot prevent that, so publishers moving from a non-compliant banner should expect an immediate drop in tracked users and attributable conversions.
- Certification is a moving target: Google and IAB update requirements periodically and each version change forces integration work on your side, not only on the vendor's.
- Connected TV consent collection depends on the app platform and remote control interface, and implementations are considerably more involved than a web banner, often requiring per-platform development.
- The wider privacy suite beyond consent is thinner than dedicated privacy platforms, so an organisation needing data subject rights automation and data mapping usually buys a second vendor anyway.
Filevine
- There is no built-in general ledger or three-way trust reconciliation, so the firm still pays for and reconciles QuickBooks separately, which undermines the single-system argument used during the sale.
- Pricing is quoted per user with an implementation fee, so a firm with paralegals and case managers who log in occasionally pays full seat cost for light users.
- Configuration flexibility becomes a liability without an internal owner, and firms that skip that role commonly end up with duplicate fields and reports nobody trusts.
- It is built around contingency and litigation workflow, so corporate, conveyancing and other transactional practices find the project model a poor fit.
- Implementation commonly runs weeks to months with paid professional services, and the annual contract starts before the firm is live, so the first year buys less usable time than it appears to.
Pricing, plan by plan
Didomi
On request- Didomi CMP$undefined/year
- Google-certified CMP for web, mobile and CTV
- IAB TCF registered
- Consent proof storage and analytics
Filevine
On request- Filevine$undefined/year
- Quoted per user per month on an annual contract
- Separate one-off implementation and configuration fee
- Lead Docket, Vinesign and AI drafting priced as add-on modules
Which should you pick?
Choose Didomi if
- You need google cmp certification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Connected TV, API.
- You also want iab tcf support.
Choose Filevine if
- You need project templates.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want lead docket intake.
Questions people ask
- Is Didomi or Filevine better?
- Neither clearly leads. Didomi starts at On request and Filevine at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Didomi or Filevine?
- Didomi starts at On request and Filevine at On request.
- Does Didomi or Filevine run on more platforms?
- Didomi runs on Web, iOS, Android, Connected TV, API. Filevine runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Didomi best used for?
- Didomi is most often used for a european publisher whose google ad manager revenue is withheld without a google-certified cmp integrated with consent mode, a broadcaster collecting consent on connected tv apps, where certified cmp options are very limited, a multinational advertiser needing one consent signal honoured consistently across web, ios and android properties, a group that must produce consent evidence to a data protection authority following a complaint. Of those, a european publisher whose google ad manager revenue is withheld without a google-certified cmp integrated with consent mode and a broadcaster collecting consent on connected tv apps, where certified cmp options are very limited are not what Filevine is typically brought in for.
- What can Didomi do that Filevine cannot?
- Didomi covers Google CMP certification, IAB TCF support, Connected TV and OTT, Mobile SDKs. Filevine covers Project templates, Lead Docket intake, Document assembly, Vinesign.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Didomi: Is Didomi Google-certified?
Yes, for web, mobile and connected TV, and the certification has been renewed across multiple years.
Filevine: Does Filevine handle trust accounting?
No. It tracks case costs and settlement disbursement but has no legal general ledger, so trust accounting is done in QuickBooks or a dedicated legal accounting product.
Didomi: Does it support IAB TCF?
Yes, it is a registered TCF CMP, currently supporting version 2.2 and later revisions.
Filevine: Is pricing published?
No. Filevine quotes per user per month on an annual contract and adds an implementation fee, so compare total first-year cost rather than the seat rate.
Didomi: What does it cost?
Not published. Pricing is based on monthly unique visitors and quoted.
Filevine: Is it suitable for a two-person firm?
Rarely. The configuration overhead and contract minimums suit firms with dedicated intake and case management staff.
Didomi: Where is consent data stored?
Didomi is a French company and offers European storage, which matters for procurement teams weighing supervisory jurisdiction.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Didomi vs Cookiebot
- Didomi vs iubenda
- Didomi vs Secure Privacy
- Didomi vs Smokeball
- Didomi vs Westlaw
- Didomi vs Docketwise
- Didomi vs LexisNexis
- Didomi vs Luminance
- Didomi vs Rocket Matter
- Didomi vs Clio
- Didomi vs MyCase
- Didomi vs Ironclad
- Didomi vs Actionstep
- Didomi vs Aderant
- Didomi vs DISCO
- Didomi vs iManage
- Didomi vs CASEpeer
- Didomi vs Litify
- Didomi vs Everlaw
- Didomi vs Relativity
- Didomi vs Logikcull
- Didomi vs CosmoLex
- Didomi vs Intapp
- Didomi vs Litera
- Didomi vs Tabs3
- Filevine vs Cookiebot
- Filevine vs iubenda
- Filevine vs Secure Privacy
- Filevine vs Smokeball
- Filevine vs Westlaw
- Filevine vs Docketwise
- Filevine vs LexisNexis
- Filevine vs Luminance
- Filevine vs Rocket Matter
- Filevine vs Clio
- Filevine vs MyCase
- Filevine vs Ironclad
- Filevine vs Actionstep
- Filevine vs Aderant
- Filevine vs DISCO
- Filevine vs iManage
- Filevine vs CASEpeer
- Filevine vs Litify
- Filevine vs Everlaw
- Filevine vs Relativity
- Filevine vs Logikcull
- Filevine vs CosmoLex
- Filevine vs Intapp
- Filevine vs Litera
- Filevine vs Tabs3
