Legal · head to head
CASEpeer vs Filevine

CASEpeer
Legal
Case management built specifically for plaintiff personal injury firms
- From
- $79/month
- Rated
- -

Filevine
Legal
Configurable case management for plaintiff litigation, intake and mass tort firms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CASEpeer it is built for plaintiff contingency work, so a firm doing hourly defence or corporate work will find no billing model that matches how it earns.; Filevine there is no built-in general ledger or three-way trust reconciliation, so the firm still pays for and reconciles QuickBooks separately, which undermines the single-system argument used during the sale.
- They diverge on capability: CASEpeer covers Intake and case screening, Filevine covers Project templates.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CASEpeer and Filevine actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CASEpeer
- Intake and case screening
- Medical treatment tracking
- Settlement and lien management
- Negotiation tracking
- Statute of limitations monitoring
Only in Filevine
- Project templates
- Lead Docket intake
- Document assembly
- Vinesign
- Case texting
- Reporting and dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CASEpeer
- Plaintiff personal injury firms replacing spreadsheets for medical records and lien trackingnot Filevine
- Contingency practices needing case value, costs advanced and net client distribution in one placenot Filevine
- Personal injury firms with high lead volume that need intake conversion measurednot Filevine
- Firms exposed to missed limitation dates across a large open caseloadnot Filevine
Filevine
- A personal injury firm that wants advertising spend, intake conversion and settlement value reported in one placenot CASEpeer
- A mass tort practice managing thousands of claimants against shared case phases and bulk document generationnot CASEpeer
- A firm replacing spreadsheets and shared drives where each practice area has different deadline rulesnot CASEpeer
- An immigration or workers compensation practice that needs form-heavy document assembly from case datanot CASEpeer
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CASEpeer
- It is built for plaintiff contingency work, so a firm doing hourly defence or corporate work will find no billing model that matches how it earns.
- There is no full double-entry general ledger, so the firm still needs separate accounting software and somebody to reconcile between the two.
- The narrow personal injury focus means a practice that diversifies into family, employment or criminal work has to run a second system or migrate.
- It has changed corporate hands three times since 2021, from independent to MyCase to AffiniPay, now trading as 8am, so roadmap continuity is a fair question to put to the vendor.
- Sitting in the 8am group aligns it with LawPay and MyCase, so firms committed to a different payments provider get less from the integrations.
Filevine
- There is no built-in general ledger or three-way trust reconciliation, so the firm still pays for and reconciles QuickBooks separately, which undermines the single-system argument used during the sale.
- Pricing is quoted per user with an implementation fee, so a firm with paralegals and case managers who log in occasionally pays full seat cost for light users.
- Configuration flexibility becomes a liability without an internal owner, and firms that skip that role commonly end up with duplicate fields and reports nobody trusts.
- It is built around contingency and litigation workflow, so corporate, conveyancing and other transactional practices find the project model a poor fit.
- Implementation commonly runs weeks to months with paid professional services, and the annual contract starts before the firm is live, so the first year buys less usable time than it appears to.
Pricing, plan by plan
CASEpeer
$79/month- Basic$79/month
- Personal injury case management
- Intake and treatment tracking
- No minimum seat count
- Pro$119/month
- Adds reporting and automation
- Lien and settlement tracking
- No long-term contract required
- Advanced$149/month
- Full feature set
- Advanced reporting
- No long-term contract required
Filevine
On request- Filevine$undefined/year
- Quoted per user per month on an annual contract
- Separate one-off implementation and configuration fee
- Lead Docket, Vinesign and AI drafting priced as add-on modules
Which should you pick?
Choose CASEpeer if
- You need intake and case screening.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want medical treatment tracking.
Choose Filevine if
- You need project templates.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want lead docket intake.
Questions people ask
- Is CASEpeer or Filevine better?
- Neither clearly leads. CASEpeer starts at $79/month and Filevine at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CASEpeer or Filevine?
- CASEpeer starts at $79/month and Filevine at On request.
- Does CASEpeer or Filevine run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is CASEpeer best used for?
- CASEpeer is most often used for plaintiff personal injury firms replacing spreadsheets for medical records and lien tracking, contingency practices needing case value, costs advanced and net client distribution in one place, personal injury firms with high lead volume that need intake conversion measured, firms exposed to missed limitation dates across a large open caseload. Of those, plaintiff personal injury firms replacing spreadsheets for medical records and lien tracking and contingency practices needing case value, costs advanced and net client distribution in one place are not what Filevine is typically brought in for.
- What can CASEpeer do that Filevine cannot?
- CASEpeer covers Intake and case screening, Medical treatment tracking, Settlement and lien management, Negotiation tracking. Filevine covers Project templates, Lead Docket intake, Document assembly, Vinesign.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CASEpeer: Is CASEpeer suitable for a corporate or defence firm?
No. It is built around contingency personal injury work: treatment, liens and settlement. A corporate firm billing hourly should look at Clio, Tabs3 or a large firm system instead.
Filevine: Does Filevine handle trust accounting?
No. It tracks case costs and settlement disbursement but has no legal general ledger, so trust accounting is done in QuickBooks or a dedicated legal accounting product.
CASEpeer: What does CASEpeer cost?
Published per-user rates are 79 USD for Basic, 119 USD for Pro and 149 USD for Advanced per month, with no minimum seat count and no long-term contract required.
Filevine: Is pricing published?
No. Filevine quotes per user per month on an annual contract and adds an implementation fee, so compare total first-year cost rather than the seat rate.
CASEpeer: Who owns CASEpeer?
It was acquired by MyCase in March 2021 and moved to AffiniPay in June 2022. AffiniPay rebranded to 8am in August 2025, so CASEpeer now sits alongside MyCase and LawPay in that group.
Filevine: Is it suitable for a two-person firm?
Rarely. The configuration overhead and contract minimums suit firms with dedicated intake and case management staff.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CASEpeer vs Clio
- CASEpeer vs MyCase
- CASEpeer vs LexisNexis
- CASEpeer vs Docketwise
- CASEpeer vs Litify
- CASEpeer vs Relativity
- CASEpeer vs Everlaw
- CASEpeer vs Smokeball
- CASEpeer vs Logikcull
- CASEpeer vs DISCO
- CASEpeer vs iManage
- CASEpeer vs Intapp
- CASEpeer vs Litera
- CASEpeer vs Rocket Matter
- CASEpeer vs Secure Privacy
- CASEpeer vs Tabs3
- CASEpeer vs Actionstep
- CASEpeer vs CosmoLex
- CASEpeer vs iubenda
- Filevine vs Clio
- Filevine vs MyCase
- Filevine vs LexisNexis
- Filevine vs Docketwise
- Filevine vs Litify
- Filevine vs Relativity
- Filevine vs Everlaw
- Filevine vs Smokeball
- Filevine vs Logikcull
- Filevine vs DISCO
- Filevine vs iManage
- Filevine vs Intapp
- Filevine vs Litera
- Filevine vs Rocket Matter
- Filevine vs Secure Privacy
- Filevine vs Tabs3
- Filevine vs Actionstep
- Filevine vs CosmoLex
- Filevine vs iubenda
