Developer Tools · head to head
Fig vs Zeabur
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Zeabur
Cloud
AI-powered cloud deployment platform for developers
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete; Zeabur free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fig and Zeabur actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that Zeabur does not also cover.
Only in Zeabur
- AI Agent
- Managed Servers
- Domain and DNS Management
- Email Service
- AI Hub
- Deploy Templates
- Git Integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Zeabur
- Deploying full-stack web applications without DevOps expertisenot Fig
- Building AI agent infrastructure with integrated API accessnot Fig
- Managing multi-region deployments with automated scalingnot Fig
- Running containerized services with built-in domain and emailnot Fig
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Zeabur
- Free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- Small team size may limit support and feature velocity
- Building spec upgrades limited on lower tiers
- Enterprise support not clearly documented
Pricing, plan by plan
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Zeabur
Free- FreeFree
- 1 manageable server
- 2C4G build specs
- 48-hour log retention
- Dev$5/month
- 3 manageable servers
- 7-day log retention
- 250 MB file uploads
- Pro$19/month
- 10 manageable servers
- 4C8G build specs
- 30-day log retention
- Team$79/month
- 3 included seats
- Unlimited manageable servers
- 90-day log retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Zeabur if
- You need ai agent.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want managed servers.
Questions people ask
- Is Fig or Zeabur better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fig starts at Free and Zeabur at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fig or Zeabur?
- Fig starts at Free and Zeabur at Free.
- Does Fig or Zeabur run on more platforms?
- Fig runs on Web. Zeabur runs on Web, CLI.
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What can Fig do that Zeabur cannot?
- Zeabur covers AI Agent, Managed Servers, Domain and DNS Management, Email Service.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Zeabur: What is included in the free plan?
The free plan includes 1 manageable server, 2C4G build specifications, 48-hour log retention, 50 MB file upload limit, and community support.
SourceZeabur: How do additional seats work on the Team plan?
The Team plan includes 3 seats with additional seats available at $24 per seat per month.
SourceZeabur: Is there a free trial period?
The Dev and Pro plans include 14 days free before billing begins.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Railway
- Fig vs Fly.io
- Fig vs Porter
- Fig vs Encore
- Fig vs Vultr
- Fig vs Hetzner Cloud
- Fig vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Fig vs Linode
- Fig vs Google Cloud Platform
- Fig vs Microsoft Azure
- Fig vs Coolify
- Fig vs Wasabi
- Fig vs Terragrunt
- Fig vs Thanos
- Fig vs Zipkin
- Fig vs Anyscale
- Fig vs DeepInfra
- Fig vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Zeabur vs Visual Studio Code
- Zeabur vs ESLint
- Zeabur vs Turborepo
- Zeabur vs pnpm
- Zeabur vs Sweep
- Zeabur vs Cody
- Zeabur vs Warp
- Zeabur vs Keycloak
- Zeabur vs Rust
- Zeabur vs CodeSandbox
- Zeabur vs Vite
- Zeabur vs Daytona
- Zeabur vs Visual Studio
- Zeabur vs Xlinesoft
- Zeabur vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Zeabur vs Sourcegraph
- Zeabur vs Railway
- Zeabur vs Fly.io
- Zeabur vs Porter
- Zeabur vs Encore
- Zeabur vs Vultr
- Zeabur vs Hetzner Cloud
- Zeabur vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Zeabur vs Linode
- Zeabur vs Google Cloud Platform
- Zeabur vs Microsoft Azure
- Zeabur vs Coolify
- Zeabur vs Wasabi
- Zeabur vs Terragrunt
- Zeabur vs Thanos
- Zeabur vs Zipkin
- Zeabur vs Anyscale
- Zeabur vs DeepInfra
- Zeabur vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
