Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs Zeabur

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Zeabur
Cloud
AI-powered cloud deployment platform for developers
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; Zeabur free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and Zeabur actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Zeabur does not also cover.
Only in Zeabur
- AI Agent
- Managed Servers
- Domain and DNS Management
- Email Service
- AI Hub
- Deploy Templates
- Git Integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Zeabur
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Zeabur
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Zeabur
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Zeabur
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Zeabur
Zeabur
- Deploying full-stack web applications without DevOps expertisenot Keycloak
- Building AI agent infrastructure with integrated API accessnot Keycloak
- Managing multi-region deployments with automated scalingnot Keycloak
- Running containerized services with built-in domain and emailnot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Zeabur
- Free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- Small team size may limit support and feature velocity
- Building spec upgrades limited on lower tiers
- Enterprise support not clearly documented
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Zeabur
Free- FreeFree
- 1 manageable server
- 2C4G build specs
- 48-hour log retention
- Dev$5/month
- 3 manageable servers
- 7-day log retention
- 250 MB file uploads
- Pro$19/month
- 10 manageable servers
- 4C8G build specs
- 30-day log retention
- Team$79/month
- 3 included seats
- Unlimited manageable servers
- 90-day log retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Choose Zeabur if
- You need ai agent.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want managed servers.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or Zeabur better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and Zeabur at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or Zeabur?
- Keycloak starts at Free and Zeabur at Free.
- Does Keycloak or Zeabur run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. Zeabur runs on Web, CLI.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what Zeabur is typically brought in for.
- What can Keycloak do that Zeabur cannot?
- Zeabur covers AI Agent, Managed Servers, Domain and DNS Management, Email Service.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceZeabur: What is included in the free plan?
The free plan includes 1 manageable server, 2C4G build specifications, 48-hour log retention, 50 MB file upload limit, and community support.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceZeabur: How do additional seats work on the Team plan?
The Team plan includes 3 seats with additional seats available at $24 per seat per month.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceZeabur: Is there a free trial period?
The Dev and Pro plans include 14 days free before billing begins.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Railway
- Keycloak vs Fly.io
- Keycloak vs Porter
- Keycloak vs Encore
- Keycloak vs Vultr
- Keycloak vs Hetzner Cloud
- Keycloak vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Keycloak vs Linode
- Keycloak vs Google Cloud Platform
- Keycloak vs Microsoft Azure
- Keycloak vs Coolify
- Keycloak vs Wasabi
- Keycloak vs Terragrunt
- Keycloak vs Thanos
- Keycloak vs Zipkin
- Keycloak vs Anyscale
- Keycloak vs DeepInfra
- Keycloak vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Zeabur vs Penpot
- Zeabur vs Soketi
- Zeabur vs Ansible
- Zeabur vs Atlantis
- Zeabur vs Vite
- Zeabur vs Depot
- Zeabur vs Pants Build
- Zeabur vs Buildkite
- Zeabur vs Coder
- Zeabur vs Jitsu
- Zeabur vs Bitbucket
- Zeabur vs Sweep
- Zeabur vs Azure DevOps
- Zeabur vs Backstage
- Zeabur vs Claude Code
- Zeabur vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Zeabur vs Cody
- Zeabur vs Railway
- Zeabur vs Fly.io
- Zeabur vs Porter
- Zeabur vs Encore
- Zeabur vs Vultr
- Zeabur vs Hetzner Cloud
- Zeabur vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Zeabur vs Linode
- Zeabur vs Google Cloud Platform
- Zeabur vs Microsoft Azure
- Zeabur vs Coolify
- Zeabur vs Wasabi
- Zeabur vs Terragrunt
- Zeabur vs Thanos
- Zeabur vs Zipkin
- Zeabur vs Anyscale
- Zeabur vs DeepInfra
- Zeabur vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
