Cloud · head to head
Encore vs Fig
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Encore limited language support (TypeScript and Go only); Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Encore and Fig actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Encore
- Local development environment
- Preview environments
- Infrastructure automation
- Cloud deployment
- Self-service operations
- Distributed tracing
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that Encore does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Encore
- Building microservices with database provisioningnot Fig
- Creating feature branch preview environmentsnot Fig
- Deploying TypeScript and Go backends to AWS/GCPnot Fig
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Encore
- Limited language support (TypeScript and Go only)
- Pro tier requires per-member subscription pricing
- Additional resource costs beyond subscription for AWS/GCP provisioning
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Pricing, plan by plan
Encore
Free- StarterFree
- 2 free dev environments
- 1M distributed tracing events/month
- 7-day log retention
- Pro$49/month
- Unlimited free dev environments
- 20M tracing events/month
- 30-day log retention
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Enterprise security and compliance
- SSO/SAML
- Custom RBAC
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Encore if
- You need local development environment.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want preview environments.
Questions people ask
- Is Encore or Fig better?
- Neither clearly leads. Encore starts at Free and Fig at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Encore or Fig?
- Encore starts at Free and Fig at Free.
- Does Encore or Fig run on more platforms?
- Encore runs on Web, CLI. Fig runs on Web.
- Can I use Encore for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Encore best used for?
- Encore is most often used for building microservices with database provisioning, creating feature branch preview environments, deploying typescript and go backends to aws/gcp. Of those, building microservices with database provisioning and creating feature branch preview environments are not what Fig is typically brought in for.
- What can Encore do that Fig cannot?
- Encore covers Local development environment, Preview environments, Infrastructure automation, Cloud deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Encore: What happens after the free tier?
The Pro plan costs $49/member/month plus usage charges of $2.50 per resource and $99 per AWS/GCP environment.
SourceEncore: Do I own my infrastructure?
Yes, Encore deploys infrastructure in your own AWS or GCP cloud account, so you maintain complete control and avoid vendor lock-in.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Encore vs Pulumi
- Encore vs Zeabur
- Encore vs Porter
- Encore vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Encore vs Hetzner Cloud
- Encore vs Linode
- Encore vs Vultr
- Encore vs Google Cloud Platform
- Encore vs Microsoft Azure
- Encore vs Nitric
- Encore vs SST
- Encore vs Heroku
- Encore vs Thanos
- Encore vs Zipkin
- Encore vs Anyscale
- Encore vs DeepInfra
- Encore vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Encore vs Visual Studio Code
- Encore vs ESLint
- Encore vs Turborepo
- Encore vs pnpm
- Encore vs Sweep
- Encore vs Cody
- Encore vs Warp
- Encore vs Keycloak
- Encore vs Rust
- Encore vs CodeSandbox
- Encore vs Vite
- Encore vs Daytona
- Encore vs Visual Studio
- Encore vs Xlinesoft
- Encore vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Encore vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Pulumi
- Fig vs Zeabur
- Fig vs Porter
- Fig vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Fig vs Hetzner Cloud
- Fig vs Linode
- Fig vs Vultr
- Fig vs Google Cloud Platform
- Fig vs Microsoft Azure
- Fig vs Nitric
- Fig vs SST
- Fig vs Heroku
- Fig vs Thanos
- Fig vs Zipkin
- Fig vs Anyscale
- Fig vs DeepInfra
- Fig vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph

