Developer Tools · head to head
Fig vs Wasabi
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Fig has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fig and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that Wasabi does not also cover.
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Fig
- Media storagenot Fig
- Archive replacementnot Fig
- Ransomware protectionnot Fig
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Fig or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fig starts at Free and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fig or Wasabi?
- Fig has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Fig and $7.99/month for Wasabi.
- Does Fig or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Fig runs on Web. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Yes. Fig has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wasabi starts at $7.99/month.
- What can Fig do that Wasabi cannot?
- Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Wasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Fig vs DigitalOcean
- Fig vs Hetzner Cloud
- Fig vs Scaleway
- Fig vs Linode
- Fig vs Vultr
- Fig vs Zeabur
- Fig vs Porter
- Fig vs Contabo
- Fig vs Encore
- Fig vs Google Cloud Platform
- Fig vs Microsoft Azure
- Fig vs HAProxy
- Fig vs IBM Cloud
- Fig vs kind
- Fig vs Koyeb
- Fig vs Kustomize
- Fig vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs Visual Studio Code
- Wasabi vs ESLint
- Wasabi vs Turborepo
- Wasabi vs pnpm
- Wasabi vs Sweep
- Wasabi vs Cody
- Wasabi vs Warp
- Wasabi vs Keycloak
- Wasabi vs Rust
- Wasabi vs CodeSandbox
- Wasabi vs Vite
- Wasabi vs Daytona
- Wasabi vs Visual Studio
- Wasabi vs Xlinesoft
- Wasabi vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Wasabi vs Sourcegraph
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd

