Developer Tools · head to head
Cody vs NICE Actimize

NICE Actimize
Cybersecurity
Financial crime, risk and compliance suite for regulated institutions
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Cody has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page; NICE Actimize modules are licensed separately, so a bank that starts with AML and later needs fraud and surveillance faces three negotiations and a bill that compounds rather than a suite price.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cody and NICE Actimize actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cody | NICE Actimize |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Linux, Windows |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2013 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that NICE Actimize does not also cover.
Only in NICE Actimize
- Suspicious activity monitoring
- Watchlist filtering
- Customer due diligence
- Payment fraud detection
- Markets surveillance
- Case management
- X-Sight marketplace
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot NICE Actimize
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot NICE Actimize
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot NICE Actimize
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot NICE Actimize
NICE Actimize
- A bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognisenot Cody
- A broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communicationsnot Cody
- A regional bank outgrowing spreadsheet-based sanctions screening and needing documented model governancenot Cody
- A payments firm needing real time fraud scoring on faster payments alongside batch AML monitoringnot Cody
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
NICE Actimize
- Modules are licensed separately, so a bank that starts with AML and later needs fraud and surveillance faces three negotiations and a bill that compounds rather than a suite price.
- Tuning and model validation are consultant-heavy, and the services spend over a deployment often exceeds the first year licence cost.
- The older on premises deployments carry batch-oriented architecture that makes true real time decisioning harder than in newer cloud native rivals.
- Rule and model changes go through a controlled release process, so a bank reacting to a new fraud typology may wait weeks for a change that a modern platform would ship in days.
- Because it is the incumbent at so many institutions, criminals have a good working understanding of what the standard rule sets detect, and undifferentiated out of the box configurations catch predictable behaviour.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
NICE Actimize
On request- NICE Actimize$undefined/year
- Licensed per module, not as one suite
- Scaled by institution asset size or transaction volume
- On premises or Actimize cloud deployment
Which should you pick?
Choose NICE Actimize if
- You need suspicious activity monitoring.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want watchlist filtering.
Questions people ask
- Is Cody or NICE Actimize better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cody starts at Free and NICE Actimize at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cody or NICE Actimize?
- Cody has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Cody and On request for NICE Actimize.
- Does Cody or NICE Actimize run on more platforms?
- Cody runs on Web. NICE Actimize runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- Can I use Cody for free?
- Yes. Cody has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. NICE Actimize starts at On request.
- What is Cody best used for?
- Cody is most often used for code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides, developer chat with codebase context awareness, automated debugging and error identification, customizable prompts for workflow automation. Of those, code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides and developer chat with codebase context awareness are not what NICE Actimize is typically brought in for.
- What can Cody do that NICE Actimize cannot?
- NICE Actimize covers Suspicious activity monitoring, Watchlist filtering, Customer due diligence, Payment fraud detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourceNICE Actimize: Is Actimize one product?
No. It is a family of separately licensed modules covering AML, fraud, due diligence and surveillance. You buy what you need and each has its own price.
Cody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourceNICE Actimize: Can it run in the cloud?
Yes, Actimize offers cloud deployment, though a large share of the installed base still runs on premises for data residency reasons.
Cody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourceNICE Actimize: Who owns it?
NICE Ltd, an Israeli company listed on Nasdaq. Actimize is its financial crime division.
Related pages
More on NICE Actimize
Other head to heads
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs Deep Code
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Steampipe
- Cody vs Tilt
- Cody vs WarpBuild
- Cody vs Webpack
- Cody vs Avo
- Cody vs Azure DevOps
- Cody vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs Silent Eight
- Cody vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Cody vs Quantexa
- Cody vs Feedzai
- Cody vs Unit21
- Cody vs Fenergo
- Cody vs Sardine
- Cody vs ThetaRay
- Cody vs Transmit Security
- Cody vs Socure
- Cody vs Sumsub
- Cody vs Jumio
- Cody vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Cody vs Recorded Future
- Cody vs RoboForm
- Cody vs Semperis
- Cody vs SentinelOne
- NICE Actimize vs Turborepo
- NICE Actimize vs Visual Studio Code
- NICE Actimize vs ESLint
- NICE Actimize vs pnpm
- NICE Actimize vs Sourcegraph
- NICE Actimize vs Sweep
- NICE Actimize vs Deep Code
- NICE Actimize vs GitHub Copilot
- NICE Actimize vs Bazel
- NICE Actimize vs Fig
- NICE Actimize vs GoLand
- NICE Actimize vs Steampipe
- NICE Actimize vs Tilt
- NICE Actimize vs WarpBuild
- NICE Actimize vs Webpack
- NICE Actimize vs Avo
- NICE Actimize vs Azure DevOps
- NICE Actimize vs PhpStorm
- NICE Actimize vs Silent Eight
- NICE Actimize vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- NICE Actimize vs Quantexa
- NICE Actimize vs Feedzai
- NICE Actimize vs Unit21
- NICE Actimize vs Fenergo
- NICE Actimize vs Sardine
- NICE Actimize vs ThetaRay
- NICE Actimize vs Transmit Security
- NICE Actimize vs Socure
- NICE Actimize vs Sumsub
- NICE Actimize vs Jumio
- NICE Actimize vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- NICE Actimize vs Recorded Future
- NICE Actimize vs RoboForm
- NICE Actimize vs Semperis
- NICE Actimize vs SentinelOne

