Manufacturing · head to head
Fictiv vs Shapr3D

Fictiv
Manufacturing
On-demand custom manufacturing with instant CAD quoting, now owned by MISUMI
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Shapr3D has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fictiv this is a manufacturing service, not software you licence, so there is nothing to deploy or own and switching means re-sourcing parts rather than exporting data.; Shapr3D the free Basic plan is limited to 2 projects
- They diverge on capability: Fictiv covers Instant CAD quoting, Shapr3D covers Direct modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fictiv and Shapr3D actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fictiv
- Instant CAD quoting
- Design for manufacturing feedback
- Multi-region network
- Multiple processes
- Quality documentation
- Order and revision tracking
- Bridge to production
Only in Shapr3D
- Direct modeling
- Parametric history
- Visualization
- 2D drawings
- Apple Pencil support
- Import/export
- Annotations
- Fusion 360
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fictiv
- An engineering team needing machined prototypes in days without qualifying a machine shop firstnot Shapr3D
- Moving a part between regions to change landed cost or tariff exposure without re-sourcing a suppliernot Shapr3D
- Bridge production between prototype tooling and a committed high-volume suppliernot Shapr3D
- Getting design-for-manufacturing feedback on a part before committing to injection mould toolingnot Shapr3D
Shapr3D
- Direct modelling CAD on iPad with Apple Pencilnot Fictiv
- Producing manufacturable solid models and technical drawingsnot Fictiv
- Sharing CAD projects with collaborators on desktop and tabletnot Fictiv
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fictiv
- This is a manufacturing service, not software you licence, so there is nothing to deploy or own and switching means re-sourcing parts rather than exporting data.
- A broker sits between you and the shop cutting your part, so at stable production volumes direct sourcing usually beats the platform price and the platform knows it.
- You do not choose or generally know the specific supplier, which makes process control, supplier audits and traceability harder in regulated or aerospace work.
- MISUMI completed a $350 million acquisition in June 2025, so roadmap and pricing now answer to a Japanese industrial components group rather than to an independent platform strategy.
- Instant quotes are geometry-driven and complex or tightly toleranced parts drop into engineer review, so the speed advantage that justified the choice disappears exactly on the parts that are hardest to source.
Shapr3D
- The free Basic plan is limited to 2 projects
- Free plan exports only basic resolution 3MF and STL, so no STEP or IGES output
- Free plan caps generative renders at 3 per day; Pro raises this to 50 per day and only Enterprise is unlimited
- Importing SLDPRT and SLDASM SolidWorks files requires Pro
- Importing NX, JT, CREO, Solid Edge and Rhino files requires Enterprise
- Exporting ACIS, FBX, Parasolid and PRC requires Enterprise
- On premises and single tenant data storage is Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is by quote with no published rate
Pricing, plan by plan
Fictiv
On request- Per-part quoting$undefined/month
- No subscription or platform fee
- Priced per part by geometry, material, process and quantity
- Instant quotes for many processes, engineer review for complex parts
Shapr3D
Free- BasicFree
- 2 projects
- cloud storage
- basic import/export (XT, STEP, IGES, DWG, STL)
- Pro$299/year
- unlimited shared team projects
- up to 2 contributors
- high-resolution exports
- Enterprise$null/custom
- granular access control
- flexible data storage (single tenant/private cloud/on-premises)
- unlimited renders
Which should you pick?
Choose Fictiv if
- You need instant cad quoting.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want design for manufacturing feedback.
Choose Shapr3D if
- You need direct modeling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on IPadOS, MacOS, Windows.
- You also want parametric history.
Questions people ask
- Is Fictiv or Shapr3D better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fictiv starts at On request and Shapr3D at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fictiv or Shapr3D?
- Shapr3D has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Fictiv and Free for Shapr3D.
- Does Fictiv or Shapr3D run on more platforms?
- Fictiv runs on Web, Cloud. Shapr3D runs on IPadOS, MacOS, Windows.
- Can I use Shapr3D for free?
- Yes. Shapr3D has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Fictiv starts at On request.
- What is Fictiv best used for?
- Fictiv is most often used for an engineering team needing machined prototypes in days without qualifying a machine shop first, moving a part between regions to change landed cost or tariff exposure without re-sourcing a supplier, bridge production between prototype tooling and a committed high-volume supplier, getting design-for-manufacturing feedback on a part before committing to injection mould tooling. Of those, an engineering team needing machined prototypes in days without qualifying a machine shop first and moving a part between regions to change landed cost or tariff exposure without re-sourcing a supplier are not what Shapr3D is typically brought in for.
- What can Fictiv do that Shapr3D cannot?
- Fictiv covers Instant CAD quoting, Design for manufacturing feedback, Multi-region network, Multiple processes. Shapr3D covers Direct modeling, Parametric history, Visualization, 2D drawings.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fictiv: Is Fictiv software I can buy?
No. It is an on-demand manufacturing service with a quoting and order management platform. You pay for parts, not for the software.
Shapr3D: How much does Shapr3D cost?
Shapr3D Basic tier is free. Pro tier is $299 per year or available monthly with price not specified on the pricing page. Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting sales.
SourceFictiv: Is Fictiv still independent?
No. MISUMI Group completed its acquisition, valued at $350 million, in June 2025. Fictiv continues to trade under its own name.
Shapr3D: Is there a free trial for Shapr3D Pro?
Yes, Shapr3D offers a 14-day free trial for Pro tier that requires a credit card, plus a 14-day money-back guarantee on purchases.
SourceFictiv: Do I know which factory makes my part?
Generally not. Fictiv manages a vetted network and allocates work within it, which is a limitation if your quality system requires named and audited suppliers.
Shapr3D: What is the difference between Shapr3D Pro and Enterprise?
Pro tier includes up to 2 contributors on unlimited shared team projects, 50 renders daily, technical drawings, and AR on iPad. Enterprise provides granular access control, flexible data storage options (single tenant, private cloud, on-premises, or cloud off), unlimited renders, extended import/export formats, and dedicated account management.
SourceFictiv: Is it cheaper than sourcing directly?
For prototypes and low volumes, usually yes once you count the cost of finding and qualifying a supplier. At stable production volumes, direct sourcing is normally cheaper.
Shapr3D: Does Shapr3D offer educational pricing?
Yes, Shapr3D is free for students and educators with annual license renewal through an in-app application form.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Fictiv vs SolidWorks
- Fictiv vs Xometry
- Fictiv vs Protolabs
- Fictiv vs AMFG
- Fictiv vs Materialise Magics
- Fictiv vs Oqton
- Fictiv vs Simplify3D
- Fictiv vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Fictiv vs Formlabs PreForm
- Fictiv vs GrabCAD Print
- Fictiv vs Markforged Eiger
- Fictiv vs KCF Technologies
- Fictiv vs MOVUS
- Fictiv vs Oden Technologies
- Fictiv vs OpenBOM
- Fictiv vs FreeCAD
- Fictiv vs V-Ray
- Fictiv vs Enscape
- Fictiv vs KeyShot
- Fictiv vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Fictiv vs IronCAD
- Fictiv vs Creo
- Fictiv vs Houdini
- Fictiv vs Inventor
- Fictiv vs Plasticity
- Fictiv vs 3D-Coat
- Fictiv vs Alibre Design
- Fictiv vs Substance 3D Designer
- Fictiv vs Vectorworks
- Fictiv vs Zoo
- Fictiv vs Twinmotion
- Fictiv vs Tinkercad
- Shapr3D vs SolidWorks
- Shapr3D vs Xometry
- Shapr3D vs Protolabs
- Shapr3D vs AMFG
- Shapr3D vs Materialise Magics
- Shapr3D vs Oqton
- Shapr3D vs Simplify3D
- Shapr3D vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Shapr3D vs Formlabs PreForm
- Shapr3D vs GrabCAD Print
- Shapr3D vs Markforged Eiger
- Shapr3D vs KCF Technologies
- Shapr3D vs MOVUS
- Shapr3D vs Oden Technologies
- Shapr3D vs OpenBOM
- Shapr3D vs FreeCAD
- Shapr3D vs V-Ray
- Shapr3D vs Enscape
- Shapr3D vs KeyShot
- Shapr3D vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Shapr3D vs IronCAD
- Shapr3D vs Creo
- Shapr3D vs Houdini
- Shapr3D vs Inventor
- Shapr3D vs Plasticity
- Shapr3D vs 3D-Coat
- Shapr3D vs Alibre Design
- Shapr3D vs Substance 3D Designer
- Shapr3D vs Vectorworks
- Shapr3D vs Zoo
- Shapr3D vs Twinmotion
- Shapr3D vs Tinkercad

