Cybersecurity · head to head
DTiQ vs Fenergo

DTiQ
Cybersecurity
Managed video loss prevention with human auditors for restaurants, convenience stores and retail
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Fenergo
Cybersecurity
Client lifecycle management and KYC onboarding for regulated financial institutions
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DTiQ you are buying labour, so the cost per site is far higher than a self-service video licence and it does not fall as camera prices do.; Fenergo implementations commonly run twelve to twenty-four months and depend on a systems integrator, so the services cost frequently exceeds the software subscription in year one.
- They diverge on capability: DTiQ covers SmartAudit, Fenergo covers Regulatory rules library.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DTiQ and Fenergo actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DTiQ
- SmartAudit
- POS transaction linking
- 360iQ platform
- Exception alerting
- Drive-through timing
- Food safety and compliance checks
- Managed installation
Only in Fenergo
- Regulatory rules library
- Digital onboarding
- Perpetual KYC
- Entity data model
- Screening orchestration
- Case management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DTiQ
- A multi-unit quick service franchisee who has no one available to review video across fifteen storesnot Fenergo
- A convenience store chain investigating till fraud by matching voids to what actually happened at the counternot Fenergo
- An operator enforcing drive-through service time standards across locations from evidence rather than anecdotenot Fenergo
- A brand auditing food safety and cleanliness compliance at franchise sites without sending a field managernot Fenergo
Fenergo
- A bank operating in twenty jurisdictions that cannot keep local KYC requirements current across separate regional teamsnot DTiQ
- A custodian moving from calendar-based periodic review to event-driven perpetual KYC to cut analyst headcountnot DTiQ
- An asset manager onboarding funds and trusts where the ownership hierarchy defeats generic identity verification toolsnot DTiQ
- A payments institution facing a regulatory remediation order and needing a defensible audit trail of every client reviewnot DTiQ
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DTiQ
- You are buying labour, so the cost per site is far higher than a self-service video licence and it does not fall as camera prices do.
- Audits are sampled, not continuous, so a problem outside the reviewed window is invisible and the score is a statistical impression rather than a complete record.
- Nothing is published on price and the commercial shape is a multi-year managed service agreement, which is harder to exit than a software subscription and typically involves bundled hardware you do not own.
- Ownership changed in a $200 million Digital Alpha led investment tied to a Cisco Meraki partnership, so the hardware and network roadmap may shift under an existing estate.
- It is built around restaurant, convenience and retail operating models, so an organisation outside those verticals gets a generic video product and pays for an audit methodology that does not fit its work.
Fenergo
- Implementations commonly run twelve to twenty-four months and depend on a systems integrator, so the services cost frequently exceeds the software subscription in year one.
- It orchestrates screening but does not supply the sanctions, PEP or adverse media data, so you still buy Dow Jones, LexisNexis or World-Check separately and those fees are per screened entity.
- The entry price is set for institutions with large onboarding volumes, which puts it out of reach of smaller banks and fintechs that would otherwise benefit from the rules library.
- Configuration is deep and specific, which makes upgrades between major versions a project rather than a patch, and some customers stay on old releases for years.
- The rules library covers regulatory requirements, not your internal risk appetite, so the policy tuning that determines whether onboarding actually gets faster remains your work.
Pricing, plan by plan
DTiQ
On request- DTiQ managed service$undefined/month
- Priced per location as a managed service, not per camera
- Audit frequency and scope determine the rate
- Hardware and installation bundled into the service agreement
Fenergo
On request- Fenergo Client Lifecycle Management$undefined/year
- Priced by institution size, jurisdictions in scope and modules licensed
- Regulatory rules content subscription bundled into the annual fee
- Implementation delivered by Fenergo or a systems integrator and quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose DTiQ if
- You need smartaudit.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want pos transaction linking.
Questions people ask
- Is DTiQ or Fenergo better?
- Neither clearly leads. DTiQ starts at On request and Fenergo at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DTiQ or Fenergo?
- DTiQ starts at On request and Fenergo at On request.
- Does DTiQ or Fenergo run on more platforms?
- DTiQ runs on Web, iOS, Android. Fenergo runs on Web.
- What is DTiQ best used for?
- DTiQ is most often used for a multi-unit quick service franchisee who has no one available to review video across fifteen stores, a convenience store chain investigating till fraud by matching voids to what actually happened at the counter, an operator enforcing drive-through service time standards across locations from evidence rather than anecdote, a brand auditing food safety and cleanliness compliance at franchise sites without sending a field manager. Of those, a multi-unit quick service franchisee who has no one available to review video across fifteen stores and a convenience store chain investigating till fraud by matching voids to what actually happened at the counter are not what Fenergo is typically brought in for.
- What can DTiQ do that Fenergo cannot?
- DTiQ covers SmartAudit, POS transaction linking, 360iQ platform, Exception alerting. Fenergo covers Regulatory rules library, Digital onboarding, Perpetual KYC, Entity data model.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DTiQ: Is DTiQ a video management system?
Not primarily. It is a managed service where human auditors review your footage and deliver scored reports. The platform exists to support that service.
Fenergo: Does Fenergo do the sanctions screening itself?
No. It orchestrates calls to third-party data providers such as Dow Jones and World-Check, and those subscriptions are additional and usually charged per screened entity.
DTiQ: How is it priced?
Per location as a managed service, based on audit scope and frequency, with hardware and installation bundled. Nothing is published.
Fenergo: Is it SaaS or on-premises?
Both. The SaaS offering runs on Microsoft Azure with regional deployment options, which matters where data residency rules prohibit client data leaving the jurisdiction.
DTiQ: Who owns DTiQ?
Digital Alpha holds a majority stake following a $200 million investment that bought out Bain Capital, BV Investment Partners and others, alongside a Cisco Meraki partnership.
Fenergo: How long does a deployment take?
Plan for a year at minimum for a multi-jurisdiction rollout. Single-jurisdiction deployments with a narrow product set can be shorter but rarely under six months.
DTiQ: Does it integrate with my POS?
Yes, with major restaurant and convenience store point of sale systems, which is what allows transaction exceptions to be replayed on video.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- DTiQ vs Rhombus Systems
- DTiQ vs Salient CompleteView
- DTiQ vs Spot AI
- DTiQ vs Envysion
- DTiQ vs March Networks
- DTiQ vs Eagle Eye Networks
- DTiQ vs Camio
- DTiQ vs BigID
- DTiQ vs NICE Actimize
- DTiQ vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- DTiQ vs Proofpoint
- DTiQ vs Genetec Security Center
- DTiQ vs Endor Labs
- DTiQ vs Enpass
- DTiQ vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- DTiQ vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- DTiQ vs Fortinet FortiGate
- DTiQ vs HID Global
- DTiQ vs Veriff
- DTiQ vs Trulioo
- DTiQ vs Jumio
- DTiQ vs Quantexa
- DTiQ vs iDenfy
- DTiQ vs Sumsub
- DTiQ vs Shufti Pro
- DTiQ vs ThetaRay
- DTiQ vs IDnow
- DTiQ vs Feedzai
- DTiQ vs Unit21
- DTiQ vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- DTiQ vs Passbolt
- DTiQ vs Ping Identity
- DTiQ vs Qualys VMDR
- DTiQ vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Fenergo vs Rhombus Systems
- Fenergo vs Salient CompleteView
- Fenergo vs Spot AI
- Fenergo vs Envysion
- Fenergo vs March Networks
- Fenergo vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Fenergo vs Camio
- Fenergo vs BigID
- Fenergo vs NICE Actimize
- Fenergo vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Fenergo vs Proofpoint
- Fenergo vs Genetec Security Center
- Fenergo vs Endor Labs
- Fenergo vs Enpass
- Fenergo vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Fenergo vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Fenergo vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Fenergo vs HID Global
- Fenergo vs Veriff
- Fenergo vs Trulioo
- Fenergo vs Jumio
- Fenergo vs Quantexa
- Fenergo vs iDenfy
- Fenergo vs Sumsub
- Fenergo vs Shufti Pro
- Fenergo vs ThetaRay
- Fenergo vs IDnow
- Fenergo vs Feedzai
- Fenergo vs Unit21
- Fenergo vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Fenergo vs Passbolt
- Fenergo vs Ping Identity
- Fenergo vs Qualys VMDR
- Fenergo vs Rapid7 InsightVM
