Databases · head to head
DataGrip vs FaunaDB

DataGrip
Databases
Cross-platform database IDE from JetBrains for SQL and NoSQL databases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

FaunaDB
Databases
Document-relational database whose hosted service closed in 2025 and whose core is now unmaintained Apache 2.0 code.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DataGrip commercial use requires a paid subscription; the free tier is non-commercial only.; FaunaDB the hosted service was wound down in 2025, so there is no managed Fauna to buy; every remaining user either operates a JVM cluster themselves or migrates, and both are projects rather than tasks.
- They diverge on capability: DataGrip covers Intelligent SQL Completion, FaunaDB covers Document-relational model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DataGrip and FaunaDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DataGrip
- Intelligent SQL Completion
- Schema Navigation
- Data Editor
- Version Control for Scripts
- Multi-database Support
Only in FaunaDB
- Document-relational model
- FQL v10
- Distributed ACID transactions
- HTTPS access
- User-defined functions
- Attribute-based access control
- Document history
- Event streaming
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DataGrip
- Writing and running SQL queries across multiple database enginesnot FaunaDB
- Browsing and editing schema and table data visuallynot FaunaDB
- Version-controlling database migration scriptsnot FaunaDB
- Standardizing database tooling across a JetBrains-based teamnot FaunaDB
FaunaDB
- Keeping an existing Fauna-backed application alive on self-hosted infrastructure while a migration is planned and fundednot DataGrip
- Extracting historical data from a Fauna dataset that can no longer be reached through the hosted APInot DataGrip
- Studying a production implementation of deterministic distributed transactions, since the full server source is now readable under Apache 2.0not DataGrip
- Forking the engine deliberately, where an organisation has JVM and distributed-systems staff and wants a document-relational store it fully controlsnot DataGrip
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DataGrip
- Commercial use requires a paid subscription; the free tier is non-commercial only.
- No built-in database administration features like backup scheduling found in dedicated DBA tools.
- Heavier resource footprint than lightweight single-purpose SQL clients.
- NoSQL support (e.g. MongoDB) is less mature than its relational database tooling.
FaunaDB
- The hosted service was wound down in 2025, so there is no managed Fauna to buy; every remaining user either operates a JVM cluster themselves or migrates, and both are projects rather than tasks.
- The open-sourced repository has had no substantive activity since May 2025 and the drivers were frozen alongside it, so you inherit responsibility for security patches in a Scala distributed database that almost nobody else is running.
- FQL has no wire or dialect compatibility with anything else, so migrating off is a rewrite of every query, index and access rule in the application rather than a data export.
- No BI tool, ORM or CDC connector speaks FQL, so reporting and analytics always required exporting the data first, and that export tooling is now also unmaintained.
- The community was small before the shutdown and has dispersed since, so operational answers, tuning advice and people who have run a Fauna cluster in anger are all scarce when something breaks.
Pricing, plan by plan
DataGrip
Free- Free (non-commercial)Free
- Personal, non-commercial use only
- Individual - Year 1$99/year
- Full DataGrip license
- Free updates during subscription
- Individual - Year 2+$79/year
- Continuity discount from second year onward
FaunaDB
Free- FreeFree
- 100K read ops
- 50K write ops
- 1GB storage
- Pro$25/month
- Pay per use
- Priority support
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose DataGrip if
- You need intelligent sql completion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on windows, mac, linux.
- You also want schema navigation.
Choose FaunaDB if
- You need document-relational model.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want fql v10.
Questions people ask
- Is DataGrip or FaunaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. DataGrip starts at Free and FaunaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DataGrip or FaunaDB?
- DataGrip starts at Free and FaunaDB at Free.
- Does DataGrip or FaunaDB run on more platforms?
- DataGrip runs on windows, mac, linux. FaunaDB runs on Web.
- Can I use DataGrip for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is DataGrip best used for?
- DataGrip is most often used for writing and running sql queries across multiple database engines, browsing and editing schema and table data visually, version-controlling database migration scripts, standardizing database tooling across a jetbrains-based team. Of those, writing and running sql queries across multiple database engines and browsing and editing schema and table data visually are not what FaunaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can DataGrip do that FaunaDB cannot?
- DataGrip covers Intelligent SQL Completion, Schema Navigation, Data Editor, Version Control for Scripts. FaunaDB covers Document-relational model, FQL v10, Distributed ACID transactions, HTTPS access.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DataGrip: Is DataGrip free for personal use?
JetBrains introduced a free non-commercial license for DataGrip in October 2025, allowing personal use, while commercial use still requires a paid annual or monthly subscription.
SourceFaunaDB: Can I still sign up for Fauna as a service?
No. Fauna Inc. wound down the hosted service in 2025 and the company website is no longer serving. The only way to run Fauna now is to build and operate the open-sourced server yourself.
DataGrip: Who qualifies for the free non-commercial license?
Only individuals are eligible, for uses like learning, open-source work, or content creation. Anyone paid by an employer, including at a non-profit, must use a commercial license instead.
SourceFaunaDB: What licence is the open-sourced code under?
Apache 2.0, with the copyright held by a FaunaDB Foundation. That is a permissive OSI licence with no competing-use clause, so you may run it, modify it and even offer it as a service.
DataGrip: How long does the free non-commercial license last?
It lasts one year and auto-renews if DataGrip was used at least once in the final six months; otherwise you can simply reapply for a new license.
SourceFaunaDB: Is the open source version the same software that ran the cloud?
It is the core database engine. The control plane, billing, dashboard and multi-tenant operational tooling that made it a service are not part of the release, so you are running the engine, not the product.
DataGrip: Does the free license have fewer features than the paid version?
No, it is a full-featured IDE identical to the paid version, though it requires anonymized telemetry sharing that cannot be opted out of under the non-commercial agreement.
SourceFaunaDB: What should I migrate to?
There is no drop-in target. Teams that valued the document model with relationships usually land on Postgres with JSONB, and teams that valued the serverless HTTP access pattern usually land on DynamoDB or a managed Postgres with an HTTP driver. Either way the query layer is rewritten.
DataGrip: Can I use DataGrip offline with the free license?
No, activation requires logging into a JetBrains Account; offline activation codes are not available for the free non-commercial license.
SourceFaunaDB: How hard is it to self-host?
It builds as a fat JAR and runs as a multi-node JVM cluster. There is an OPERATING.md, but no supported packaging, no operator, no upstream releases and no support contract, so budget for a distributed-systems engineer, not a container.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- DataGrip vs RavenDB
- DataGrip vs Couchbase
- DataGrip vs DynamoDB
- DataGrip vs Oracle Database
- DataGrip vs Cassandra
- DataGrip vs Microsoft SQL Server
- DataGrip vs Firebase Realtime Database
- DataGrip vs IBM Db2
- DataGrip vs ScyllaDB
- DataGrip vs Cockroach Labs
- DataGrip vs PostgreSQL
- DataGrip vs Estuary
- DataGrip vs Firebolt
- DataGrip vs Google Cloud SQL
- DataGrip vs CouchDB
- DataGrip vs Amazon Aurora
- DataGrip vs Airtable
- DataGrip vs BigQuery
- DataGrip vs CosmosDB
- DataGrip vs ArangoDB
- DataGrip vs Dgraph
- DataGrip vs Apache Pinot
- DataGrip vs Amazon RDS
- DataGrip vs Apache Pulsar
- DataGrip vs Amazon Redshift
- FaunaDB vs RavenDB
- FaunaDB vs Couchbase
- FaunaDB vs DynamoDB
- FaunaDB vs Oracle Database
- FaunaDB vs Cassandra
- FaunaDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- FaunaDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- FaunaDB vs IBM Db2
- FaunaDB vs ScyllaDB
- FaunaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- FaunaDB vs PostgreSQL
- FaunaDB vs Estuary
- FaunaDB vs Firebolt
- FaunaDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- FaunaDB vs CouchDB
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- FaunaDB vs Airtable
- FaunaDB vs BigQuery
- FaunaDB vs CosmosDB
- FaunaDB vs ArangoDB
- FaunaDB vs Dgraph
- FaunaDB vs Apache Pinot
- FaunaDB vs Amazon RDS
- FaunaDB vs Apache Pulsar
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Redshift
