Databases · head to head
FaunaDB vs Preset

FaunaDB
Databases
Document-relational database whose hosted service closed in 2025 and whose core is now unmaintained Apache 2.0 code.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FaunaDB the hosted service was wound down in 2025, so there is no managed Fauna to buy; every remaining user either operates a JVM cluster themselves or migrates, and both are projects rather than tasks.; Preset limited SQL IDE advanced features compared to specialized query tools
- They diverge on capability: FaunaDB covers Document-relational model, Preset covers Managed Superset.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FaunaDB and Preset actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FaunaDB
- Document-relational model
- FQL v10
- Distributed ACID transactions
- HTTPS access
- User-defined functions
- Attribute-based access control
- Document history
- Event streaming
Only in Preset
- Managed Superset
- Auto-scaling
- Enterprise Security
- Custom Branding
- API Access
- Snowflake
- BigQuery
- Redshift
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FaunaDB
- Keeping an existing Fauna-backed application alive on self-hosted infrastructure while a migration is planned and fundednot Preset
- Extracting historical data from a Fauna dataset that can no longer be reached through the hosted APInot Preset
- Studying a production implementation of deterministic distributed transactions, since the full server source is now readable under Apache 2.0not Preset
- Forking the engine deliberately, where an organisation has JVM and distributed-systems staff and wants a document-relational store it fully controlsnot Preset
Preset
- Self-service analyticsnot FaunaDB
- Data explorationnot FaunaDB
- Ad-hoc reportingnot FaunaDB
- Collaborative analysisnot FaunaDB
- Embedded analyticsnot FaunaDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FaunaDB
- The hosted service was wound down in 2025, so there is no managed Fauna to buy; every remaining user either operates a JVM cluster themselves or migrates, and both are projects rather than tasks.
- The open-sourced repository has had no substantive activity since May 2025 and the drivers were frozen alongside it, so you inherit responsibility for security patches in a Scala distributed database that almost nobody else is running.
- FQL has no wire or dialect compatibility with anything else, so migrating off is a rewrite of every query, index and access rule in the application rather than a data export.
- No BI tool, ORM or CDC connector speaks FQL, so reporting and analytics always required exporting the data first, and that export tooling is now also unmaintained.
- The community was small before the shutdown and has dispersed since, so operational answers, tuning advice and people who have run a Fauna cluster in anger are all scarce when something breaks.
Preset
- Limited SQL IDE advanced features compared to specialized query tools
- Viewer licenses add substantial cost for embedded analytics deployments
- Dataset-centric approach requires preprocessing by data teams for some use cases
Pricing, plan by plan
FaunaDB
Free- FreeFree
- 100K read ops
- 50K write ops
- 1GB storage
- Pro$25/month
- Pay per use
- Priority support
- Advanced features
Preset
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Preset review.
Which should you pick?
Choose FaunaDB if
- You need document-relational model.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want fql v10.
Choose Preset if
- You need managed superset.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want auto-scaling.
Questions people ask
- Is FaunaDB or Preset better?
- Neither clearly leads. FaunaDB starts at Free and Preset at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FaunaDB or Preset?
- FaunaDB starts at Free and Preset at Free.
- Does FaunaDB or Preset run on more platforms?
- FaunaDB runs on Web. Preset runs on Web, Cloud.
- Can I use FaunaDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FaunaDB best used for?
- FaunaDB is most often used for keeping an existing fauna-backed application alive on self-hosted infrastructure while a migration is planned and funded, extracting historical data from a fauna dataset that can no longer be reached through the hosted api, studying a production implementation of deterministic distributed transactions, since the full server source is now readable under apache 2.0, forking the engine deliberately, where an organisation has jvm and distributed-systems staff and wants a document-relational store it fully controls. Of those, keeping an existing fauna-backed application alive on self-hosted infrastructure while a migration is planned and funded and extracting historical data from a fauna dataset that can no longer be reached through the hosted api are not what Preset is typically brought in for.
- What can FaunaDB do that Preset cannot?
- FaunaDB covers Document-relational model, FQL v10, Distributed ACID transactions, HTTPS access. Preset covers Managed Superset, Auto-scaling, Enterprise Security, Custom Branding.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FaunaDB: Can I still sign up for Fauna as a service?
No. Fauna Inc. wound down the hosted service in 2025 and the company website is no longer serving. The only way to run Fauna now is to build and operate the open-sourced server yourself.
Preset: Is Preset free?
Preset offers a free tier for small teams called Starter with 5 users and no credit card required. Paid plans start at $25 per user per month.
SourceFaunaDB: What licence is the open-sourced code under?
Apache 2.0, with the copyright held by a FaunaDB Foundation. That is a permissive OSI licence with no competing-use clause, so you may run it, modify it and even offer it as a service.
Preset: Can I export my data from Preset?
Yes. Preset uses Apache Superset and the founders contribute over 75% of commits to the open-source project, enabling migration to Superset without vendor lock-in.
SourceFaunaDB: Is the open source version the same software that ran the cloud?
It is the core database engine. The control plane, billing, dashboard and multi-tenant operational tooling that made it a service are not part of the release, so you are running the engine, not the product.
Preset: Does Preset include embedded analytics?
Yes. Embedded dashboards are available on Professional and Enterprise plans, with viewer licenses starting at $500 per month for 50 licenses.
SourceFaunaDB: What should I migrate to?
There is no drop-in target. Teams that valued the document model with relationships usually land on Postgres with JSONB, and teams that valued the serverless HTTP access pattern usually land on DynamoDB or a managed Postgres with an HTTP driver. Either way the query layer is rewritten.
Preset: What is the enterprise pricing for Preset?
Enterprise plans are custom quoted. The median buyer pays $35,495 per year.
SourceFaunaDB: How hard is it to self-host?
It builds as a fat JAR and runs as a multi-node JVM cluster. There is an OPERATING.md, but no supported packaging, no operator, no upstream releases and no support contract, so budget for a distributed-systems engineer, not a container.
Preset: Does Preset support AI-powered analytics?
Yes. As of 2026, Preset includes an AI Chatbot and MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration for building charts and dashboards via natural language.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- FaunaDB vs PostgreSQL
- FaunaDB vs Airtable
- FaunaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- FaunaDB vs BigQuery
- FaunaDB vs CouchDB
- FaunaDB vs CosmosDB
- FaunaDB vs ArangoDB
- FaunaDB vs Dgraph
- FaunaDB vs DynamoDB
- FaunaDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- FaunaDB vs Apache Pinot
- FaunaDB vs Amazon RDS
- FaunaDB vs Apache Pulsar
- FaunaDB vs Cassandra
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Redshift
- FaunaDB vs Power BI
- FaunaDB vs Amazon QuickSight
- FaunaDB vs Domo
- FaunaDB vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- FaunaDB vs Chartio
- FaunaDB vs Reportz
- FaunaDB vs Snowplow
- FaunaDB vs Yellowfin
- FaunaDB vs Zebra BI
- FaunaDB vs Sisense
- FaunaDB vs MicroStrategy
- FaunaDB vs Qlik Sense
- FaunaDB vs ThoughtSpot
- FaunaDB vs Cube
- FaunaDB vs Pigment
- FaunaDB vs Cyfe
- FaunaDB vs DashThis
- FaunaDB vs Deepnote
- Preset vs Amazon Aurora
- Preset vs PostgreSQL
- Preset vs Airtable
- Preset vs Cockroach Labs
- Preset vs BigQuery
- Preset vs CouchDB
- Preset vs CosmosDB
- Preset vs ArangoDB
- Preset vs Dgraph
- Preset vs DynamoDB
- Preset vs Google Cloud SQL
- Preset vs Apache Pinot
- Preset vs Amazon RDS
- Preset vs Apache Pulsar
- Preset vs Cassandra
- Preset vs Amazon Redshift
- Preset vs Power BI
- Preset vs Amazon QuickSight
- Preset vs Domo
- Preset vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Preset vs Chartio
- Preset vs Reportz
- Preset vs Snowplow
- Preset vs Yellowfin
- Preset vs Zebra BI
- Preset vs Sisense
- Preset vs MicroStrategy
- Preset vs Qlik Sense
- Preset vs ThoughtSpot
- Preset vs Cube
- Preset vs Pigment
- Preset vs Cyfe
- Preset vs DashThis
- Preset vs Deepnote

