Cybersecurity · head to head
Falco vs Trimble Unity Maintain

Falco
Cybersecurity
CNCF-graduated runtime threat detection for Linux and Kubernetes using eBPF
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Trimble Unity Maintain
Government
GIS-centric public asset and work management, the product formerly sold as Cityworks
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Falco has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Falco falco detects and alerts but does not block; stopping an attack requires wiring up Falco Talon or your own response tooling, so out of the box a confirmed detection still means a human intervening after the fact.; Trimble Unity Maintain esri ArcGIS is a hard prerequisite, so an organisation without it faces a second substantial licence and a GIS programme before the maintenance system can be used at all.
- They diverge on capability: Falco covers eBPF kernel instrumentation, Trimble Unity Maintain covers Built on ArcGIS.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Falco and Trimble Unity Maintain actually diverge.
| Attribute | Falco | Trimble Unity Maintain |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Kubernetes, Self-hosted | Web, iOS, Android, Windows |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Falco
- eBPF kernel instrumentation
- System call rules engine
- Container and Kubernetes context
- Default rule set
- Falcosidekick
- Falco Talon
- Plugins framework
- DaemonSet deployment
Only in Trimble Unity Maintain
- Built on ArcGIS
- Service requests
- Work order management
- Permits and licensing
- Mobile field access
- Storeroom and inventory
- Operational Insights
- AgileAssets convergence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Falco
- A platform team that needs to know when a shell is opened inside a production container, which image scanning cannot detect because it happens at runtimenot Trimble Unity Maintain
- A regulated business required to evidence host and container intrusion detection on Kubernetes nodes for an auditnot Trimble Unity Maintain
- A security team wanting a vendor-neutral detection layer whose rules they can read and modify rather than a black-box agentnot Trimble Unity Maintain
- A cluster where a compromised dependency might write to sensitive paths or open unexpected outbound connections, and only kernel-level visibility will catch itnot Trimble Unity Maintain
Trimble Unity Maintain
- A water utility wanting valve exercising and hydrant flushing recorded against the same GIS features the engineering team maintainsnot Falco
- A city consolidating a citizen service request line, work orders and inspections into one location-based systemnot Falco
- A state transportation department managing pavement and bridge assets with linear referencing rather than point assetsnot Falco
- A public works department that has already licensed ArcGIS Enterprise and wants to avoid rekeying its asset inventorynot Falco
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Falco
- Falco detects and alerts but does not block; stopping an attack requires wiring up Falco Talon or your own response tooling, so out of the box a confirmed detection still means a human intervening after the fact.
- The default rule set is noisy in real clusters and generates a large volume of benign matches from normal operational activity; without weeks of tuning, alert fatigue sets in and the team stops reading the feed, which is the usual failure mode.
- There is no storage, console, search or case management in the project, so a working detection capability means also running Falcosidekick, an event store, a dashboard and alert routing, all of which you build, host and maintain.
- The modern eBPF driver requires kernel 5.8 or later; older hosts fall back to the legacy probe or the kernel module, which brings driver-building against kernel headers and the operational fragility that comes with it on every kernel upgrade.
- Per-node syscall instrumentation carries measurable CPU overhead on busy hosts, and the cost scales with syscall volume rather than with cluster size, so the noisiest and most performance-sensitive workloads are exactly the ones that feel it most.
Trimble Unity Maintain
- Esri ArcGIS is a hard prerequisite, so an organisation without it faces a second substantial licence and a GIS programme before the maintenance system can be used at all.
- The product is mid-rename from Cityworks to Trimble Unity Maintain with transition timelines Trimble has not committed to publicly, leaving contracts, documentation and integrator experience split between two names.
- CVE-2025-0994, a deserialisation flaw in Cityworks, was exploited in the wild and listed by CISA in February 2025, which makes on-premise deployments a patching obligation rather than a set-and-forget install.
- Because assets live in the GIS, changing the asset model is a GIS division change, so maintenance teams cannot restructure their own hierarchy without another department in the loop.
- It is built for North American public sector practice, and the permitting, funding source and reporting models do not map cleanly onto other countries or onto private industrial estates.
Pricing, plan by plan
Falco
Free- Falco (open source)Free
- Apache 2.0 licence, CNCF graduated project
- eBPF and kernel module drivers
- Full rules engine and default rule set
Trimble Unity Maintain
On request- Trimble Unity Maintain$undefined/year
- Annual subscription sized by population served, asset volume and user count
- Esri ArcGIS Enterprise or ArcGIS Online licensing required separately
- Hosted and on-premise deployment priced differently
Which should you pick?
Choose Falco if
- You need ebpf kernel instrumentation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want system call rules engine.
Choose Trimble Unity Maintain if
- You need built on arcgis.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want service requests.
Questions people ask
- Is Falco or Trimble Unity Maintain better?
- Neither clearly leads. Falco starts at Free and Trimble Unity Maintain at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Falco or Trimble Unity Maintain?
- Falco has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Falco and On request for Trimble Unity Maintain.
- Does Falco or Trimble Unity Maintain run on more platforms?
- Falco runs on Linux, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. Trimble Unity Maintain runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- Can I use Falco for free?
- Yes. Falco has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Trimble Unity Maintain starts at On request.
- What is Falco best used for?
- Falco is most often used for a platform team that needs to know when a shell is opened inside a production container, which image scanning cannot detect because it happens at runtime, a regulated business required to evidence host and container intrusion detection on kubernetes nodes for an audit, a security team wanting a vendor-neutral detection layer whose rules they can read and modify rather than a black-box agent, a cluster where a compromised dependency might write to sensitive paths or open unexpected outbound connections, and only kernel-level visibility will catch it. Of those, a platform team that needs to know when a shell is opened inside a production container, which image scanning cannot detect because it happens at runtime and a regulated business required to evidence host and container intrusion detection on kubernetes nodes for an audit are not what Trimble Unity Maintain is typically brought in for.
- What can Falco do that Trimble Unity Maintain cannot?
- Falco covers eBPF kernel instrumentation, System call rules engine, Container and Kubernetes context, Default rule set. Trimble Unity Maintain covers Built on ArcGIS, Service requests, Work order management, Permits and licensing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Falco: Does Falco block attacks?
No. It detects and emits events. Response requires Falco Talon or your own automation on top.
Trimble Unity Maintain: Is Cityworks discontinued?
Not discontinued, renamed. It is becoming Trimble Unity Maintain, converging with AgileAssets, and Trimble has not published a final transition date.
Falco: Is Falco owned by Sysdig?
Sysdig created and open sourced it, but it graduated within the CNCF in February 2024, so governance sits with the foundation rather than the vendor.
Trimble Unity Maintain: Do I need Esri ArcGIS?
Yes. The product is built on ArcGIS and cannot be deployed without an Esri licence.
Falco: What does it cost?
The project is Apache 2.0 with no licence fee. The cost is the storage, routing, tuning and staff time needed to make its output useful.
Trimble Unity Maintain: Was there a security incident?
Yes. CVE-2025-0994 in Cityworks was exploited in the wild and added to the CISA known exploited vulnerabilities catalogue in February 2025.
Falco: What kernel version do I need?
Kernel 5.8 or later for the default modern eBPF driver. Older hosts need the legacy eBPF probe or the kernel module.
Trimble Unity Maintain: Can it handle roads and pavement as well as pipes?
Yes, through the AgileAssets lineage now inside the Unity Maintain family, which adds linear referencing for transportation assets.
Related pages
More on Trimble Unity Maintain
Other head to heads
- Falco vs Snyk
- Falco vs Teleport
- Falco vs Darktrace
- Falco vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Falco vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Falco vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Falco vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Falco vs WireGuard
- Falco vs Bitwarden
- Falco vs Infisical
- Falco vs Semgrep
- Falco vs Trivy
- Falco vs One Identity
- Falco vs Ory Kratos
- Falco vs OWASP ZAP
- Falco vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Falco vs Passbolt
- Falco vs Ping Identity
- Falco vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Falco vs VUEWorks
- Falco vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Falco vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- Falco vs RecDesk
- Falco vs DataSF
- Falco vs CityView
- Falco vs Euna Solutions
- Falco vs Clariti
- Falco vs Springbrook Software
- Falco vs OpenGov
- Falco vs Bidnet Direct
- Falco vs ShotSpotter
- Falco vs Tyler Brazos
- Falco vs Vigilant Solutions
- Falco vs Workday Government
- Falco vs Zencity
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Snyk
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Teleport
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Darktrace
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs WireGuard
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Bitwarden
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Infisical
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Semgrep
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Trivy
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs One Identity
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Ory Kratos
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs OWASP ZAP
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Passbolt
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Ping Identity
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs VUEWorks
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs RecDesk
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs DataSF
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs CityView
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Euna Solutions
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Clariti
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Springbrook Software
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs OpenGov
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Bidnet Direct
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs ShotSpotter
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Tyler Brazos
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Vigilant Solutions
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Workday Government
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Zencity
