Cybersecurity · head to head
Falco vs ShotSpotter

Falco
Cybersecurity
CNCF-graduated runtime threat detection for Linux and Kubernetes using eBPF
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Falco has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Falco falco detects and alerts but does not block; stopping an attack requires wiring up Falco Talon or your own response tooling, so out of the box a confirmed detection still means a human intervening after the fact.; ShotSpotter shotSpotter now trades as SoundThinking and shotspotter.com redirects to soundthinking.com
- They diverge on capability: Falco covers eBPF kernel instrumentation, ShotSpotter covers Gunshot Detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Falco and ShotSpotter actually diverge.
| Attribute | Falco | ShotSpotter |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $5000/month |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Kubernetes, Self-hosted | Web, Ios, Android |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
| Founded | Unknown | 1996 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Falco
- eBPF kernel instrumentation
- System call rules engine
- Container and Kubernetes context
- Default rule set
- Falcosidekick
- Falco Talon
- Plugins framework
- DaemonSet deployment
Only in ShotSpotter
- Gunshot Detection
- Location Triangulation
- Real-time Alerts
- Forensic Analysis
- Historical Data
- CAD Systems
- 911 Centers
- Camera Systems
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Falco
- A platform team that needs to know when a shell is opened inside a production container, which image scanning cannot detect because it happens at runtimenot ShotSpotter
- A regulated business required to evidence host and container intrusion detection on Kubernetes nodes for an auditnot ShotSpotter
- A security team wanting a vendor-neutral detection layer whose rules they can read and modify rather than a black-box agentnot ShotSpotter
- A cluster where a compromised dependency might write to sensitive paths or open unexpected outbound connections, and only kernel-level visibility will catch itnot ShotSpotter
ShotSpotter
- Gunshot detection and location alerting for police departmentsnot Falco
- Directing patrol response to outdoor firearm dischargesnot Falco
- Building incident data for law enforcement analysisnot Falco
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Falco
- Falco detects and alerts but does not block; stopping an attack requires wiring up Falco Talon or your own response tooling, so out of the box a confirmed detection still means a human intervening after the fact.
- The default rule set is noisy in real clusters and generates a large volume of benign matches from normal operational activity; without weeks of tuning, alert fatigue sets in and the team stops reading the feed, which is the usual failure mode.
- There is no storage, console, search or case management in the project, so a working detection capability means also running Falcosidekick, an event store, a dashboard and alert routing, all of which you build, host and maintain.
- The modern eBPF driver requires kernel 5.8 or later; older hosts fall back to the legacy probe or the kernel module, which brings driver-building against kernel headers and the operational fragility that comes with it on every kernel upgrade.
- Per-node syscall instrumentation carries measurable CPU overhead on busy hosts, and the cost scales with syscall volume rather than with cluster size, so the noisiest and most performance-sensitive workloads are exactly the ones that feel it most.
ShotSpotter
- ShotSpotter now trades as SoundThinking and shotspotter.com redirects to soundthinking.com
- No pricing is published; the site routes to contact and demo requests with no published rate, minimum or cost driver
- The service depends on an acoustic sensor array installed across a defined coverage area rather than being software alone
Pricing, plan by plan
Falco
Free- Falco (open source)Free
- Apache 2.0 licence, CNCF graduated project
- eBPF and kernel module drivers
- Full rules engine and default rule set
ShotSpotter
$5000/month- Detection Service$5000/month
- Gunshot Detection
- Real-time Alerts
- Forensic Reports
Which should you pick?
Choose Falco if
- You need ebpf kernel instrumentation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want system call rules engine.
Choose ShotSpotter if
- You need gunshot detection.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want location triangulation.
Questions people ask
- Is Falco or ShotSpotter better?
- Neither clearly leads. Falco starts at Free and ShotSpotter at $5000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Falco or ShotSpotter?
- Falco has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Falco and $5000/month for ShotSpotter.
- Does Falco or ShotSpotter run on more platforms?
- Falco runs on Linux, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. ShotSpotter runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- Can I use Falco for free?
- Yes. Falco has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. ShotSpotter starts at $5000/month.
- What is Falco best used for?
- Falco is most often used for a platform team that needs to know when a shell is opened inside a production container, which image scanning cannot detect because it happens at runtime, a regulated business required to evidence host and container intrusion detection on kubernetes nodes for an audit, a security team wanting a vendor-neutral detection layer whose rules they can read and modify rather than a black-box agent, a cluster where a compromised dependency might write to sensitive paths or open unexpected outbound connections, and only kernel-level visibility will catch it. Of those, a platform team that needs to know when a shell is opened inside a production container, which image scanning cannot detect because it happens at runtime and a regulated business required to evidence host and container intrusion detection on kubernetes nodes for an audit are not what ShotSpotter is typically brought in for.
- What can Falco do that ShotSpotter cannot?
- Falco covers eBPF kernel instrumentation, System call rules engine, Container and Kubernetes context, Default rule set. ShotSpotter covers Gunshot Detection, Location Triangulation, Real-time Alerts, Forensic Analysis.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Falco: Does Falco block attacks?
No. It detects and emits events. Response requires Falco Talon or your own automation on top.
ShotSpotter: Does SoundThinking publish ShotSpotter pricing?
No. SoundThinking does not disclose ShotSpotter pricing on their website. Interested municipalities and organizations must request a consultation, contact the sales team, or book a demo.
SourceFalco: Is Falco owned by Sysdig?
Sysdig created and open sourced it, but it graduated within the CNCF in February 2024, so governance sits with the foundation rather than the vendor.
ShotSpotter: How do I get a ShotSpotter quote?
SoundThinking directs prospects to book a demo, contact them directly, or request a consultation through their website. No self-serve pricing, calculator, or trial is available.
SourceFalco: What does it cost?
The project is Apache 2.0 with no licence fee. The cost is the storage, routing, tuning and staff time needed to make its output useful.
ShotSpotter: Who is ShotSpotter for?
ShotSpotter is a gunshot detection system designed for law enforcement and municipalities to improve public safety response.
SourceFalco: What kernel version do I need?
Kernel 5.8 or later for the default modern eBPF driver. Older hosts need the legacy eBPF probe or the kernel module.
Related pages
More on ShotSpotter
Other head to heads
- Falco vs Snyk
- Falco vs Teleport
- Falco vs Darktrace
- Falco vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Falco vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Falco vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Falco vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Falco vs WireGuard
- Falco vs Bitwarden
- Falco vs Infisical
- Falco vs Semgrep
- Falco vs Trivy
- Falco vs One Identity
- Falco vs Ory Kratos
- Falco vs OWASP ZAP
- Falco vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Falco vs Passbolt
- Falco vs Ping Identity
- Falco vs CivicPlus
- Falco vs Accela
- Falco vs Granicus
- Falco vs DocuWare
- Falco vs Citizen
- Falco vs Tyler Brazos
- Falco vs Vigilant Solutions
- Falco vs Axon Records
- Falco vs IAPro
- Falco vs Mark43
- Falco vs Ring Neighbors
- Falco vs Palantir Gotham
- Falco vs Periscope Holdings
- Falco vs SafeCity
- Falco vs SAP for Government
- Falco vs Rock Solid
- Falco vs Tyler Technologies
- ShotSpotter vs Snyk
- ShotSpotter vs Teleport
- ShotSpotter vs Darktrace
- ShotSpotter vs LogRhythm SIEM
- ShotSpotter vs Trend Micro Vision One
- ShotSpotter vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- ShotSpotter vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- ShotSpotter vs WireGuard
- ShotSpotter vs Bitwarden
- ShotSpotter vs Infisical
- ShotSpotter vs Semgrep
- ShotSpotter vs Trivy
- ShotSpotter vs One Identity
- ShotSpotter vs Ory Kratos
- ShotSpotter vs OWASP ZAP
- ShotSpotter vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- ShotSpotter vs Passbolt
- ShotSpotter vs Ping Identity
- ShotSpotter vs CivicPlus
- ShotSpotter vs Accela
- ShotSpotter vs Granicus
- ShotSpotter vs DocuWare
- ShotSpotter vs Citizen
- ShotSpotter vs Tyler Brazos
- ShotSpotter vs Vigilant Solutions
- ShotSpotter vs Axon Records
- ShotSpotter vs IAPro
- ShotSpotter vs Mark43
- ShotSpotter vs Ring Neighbors
- ShotSpotter vs Palantir Gotham
- ShotSpotter vs Periscope Holdings
- ShotSpotter vs SafeCity
- ShotSpotter vs SAP for Government
- ShotSpotter vs Rock Solid
- ShotSpotter vs Tyler Technologies

