Energy · head to head
ETAP vs Wood Mackenzie Lens

ETAP
Energy
Electrical power system design and analysis software
- From
- $5000/year
- Rated
- -

Wood Mackenzie Lens
Energy
Subscription research data and analytics covering oil, gas, power, renewables and mining assets
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ETAP no pricing is published, and reaching a figure requires completing a multi step quote form; Wood Mackenzie Lens licensing is per named seat and per dataset, so sharing a login across an analyst team breaches the contract and licensing the team properly multiplies the fee rather than adding to it.
- They diverge on capability: ETAP covers Load flow analysis, Wood Mackenzie Lens covers Upstream asset data.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ETAP and Wood Mackenzie Lens actually diverge.
| Attribute | ETAP | Wood Mackenzie Lens |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $5000/year | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Windows, Api | Web, API |
| Founded | 1986 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Energy).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ETAP
- Load flow analysis
- Short circuit analysis
- Arc flash analysis
- Protective device coordination
- Harmonics analysis
- Transient stability
- Cable sizing
- Panel schedule design
Only in Wood Mackenzie Lens
- Upstream asset data
- Power and renewables
- Metals and mining
- Gas and LNG
- Energy transition scenarios
- Emissions data
- Lens Direct
- Scenario and portfolio tools
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ETAP
- Electrical power system modelling, simulation and analysisnot Wood Mackenzie Lens
- Arc flash, load flow and protection coordination studiesnot Wood Mackenzie Lens
Wood Mackenzie Lens
- A corporate development team screening acquisition targets against independent asset economicsnot ETAP
- A lender or investor testing a project sponsor case against third-party cost and production estimatesnot ETAP
- A strategy team building long-term scenarios that need consistent cross-commodity assumptionsnot ETAP
- A trading or origination desk that needs asset level supply data pulled into its own models through the APInot ETAP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ETAP
- No pricing is published, and reaching a figure requires completing a multi step quote form
- Subscription durations offered are 3 years and 5 years, so there is no short commitment option
- Licences are banded by user count rather than sold individually, in brackets of 1, 5 to 15, 15 to 25, 25 to 50 and over 50
- National and international network licences are priced separately
Wood Mackenzie Lens
- Licensing is per named seat and per dataset, so sharing a login across an analyst team breaches the contract and licensing the team properly multiplies the fee rather than adding to it.
- The content is analyst-modelled rather than operator-reported, so asset economics and reserve figures are estimates and can differ materially from what the owner of the asset publishes.
- Modules are split by commodity and by region, and a question that spans gas and power, or Americas and EMEA, can require two or three separate subscriptions to answer.
- Content refresh follows the research publication calendar, so individual asset records can lag a transaction or a project decision by a quarter or more, which matters on live deals.
- Ownership passed from Verisk to Veritas Capital in 2023, so buyers signing multi-year terms are contracting with a private equity holding whose plans for pricing and packaging are not public.
Pricing, plan by plan
ETAP
$5000/year- Standard$5000/year
- Load flow analysis
- Short circuit analysis
- Arc flash analysis
- Professional$15000/year
- Advanced analysis
- Protective device coordination
- Harmonics analysis
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Real-time monitoring
- SCADA integration
- Custom modules
Wood Mackenzie Lens
On request- Lens subscription$undefined/year
- Quoted per dataset and per named user
- Regional variants of a module are priced as separate subscriptions
- Lens Direct API access licensed on top of platform access
Which should you pick?
Choose ETAP if
- You need load flow analysis.
- You work on Windows, Api.
- You also want short circuit analysis.
Choose Wood Mackenzie Lens if
- You need upstream asset data.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want power and renewables.
Questions people ask
- Is ETAP or Wood Mackenzie Lens better?
- Neither clearly leads. ETAP starts at $5000/year and Wood Mackenzie Lens at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ETAP or Wood Mackenzie Lens?
- ETAP starts at $5000/year and Wood Mackenzie Lens at On request.
- Does ETAP or Wood Mackenzie Lens run on more platforms?
- ETAP runs on Windows, Api. Wood Mackenzie Lens runs on Web, API.
- What is ETAP best used for?
- ETAP is most often used for electrical power system modelling, simulation and analysis, arc flash, load flow and protection coordination studies. Of those, electrical power system modelling, simulation and analysis and arc flash, load flow and protection coordination studies are not what Wood Mackenzie Lens is typically brought in for.
- What can ETAP do that Wood Mackenzie Lens cannot?
- ETAP covers Load flow analysis, Short circuit analysis, Arc flash analysis, Protective device coordination. Wood Mackenzie Lens covers Upstream asset data, Power and renewables, Metals and mining, Gas and LNG.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ETAP: How is ETAP priced?
ETAP uses subscription-based pricing with tiered bundles (Launch, Grow, Scale) and optional add-ons. Specific prices are not published and require completing a quote request form.
SourceWood Mackenzie Lens: Am I buying software or research?
Research. Lens is the delivery platform for Wood Mackenzie analysis, and the analysis is what the price reflects.
ETAP: What products does ETAP offer pricing for?
ETAP offers three main product lines with tiered bundles: CANECO (Electrical Design), ETAP (Power Systems Analysis), and SEE Electrical (Electrical Engineering). Each supports 1-50+ users with 3-5 year term options.
SourceWood Mackenzie Lens: Who owns Wood Mackenzie?
Veritas Capital, which acquired it from Verisk in 2023.
Wood Mackenzie Lens: Can a team share one licence?
No. Licences are per named user, and sharing breaches the subscription terms.
Wood Mackenzie Lens: Can I get the data into my own models?
Yes, through Lens Direct, which is licensed separately from platform access.
Related pages
More on Wood Mackenzie Lens
Other head to heads
- ETAP vs ABB Ability
- ETAP vs Aurora Solar
- ETAP vs Enphase Enlighten
- ETAP vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- ETAP vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- ETAP vs HOMER Energy
- ETAP vs Trane Tracer Building Management
- ETAP vs Azelio Energy Storage
- ETAP vs Emerson Ovation
- ETAP vs Proxibel Grid Suite
- ETAP vs Siemens Spectrum Power
- ETAP vs GE Digital Grid Software
- ETAP vs Fluence Energy Management
- ETAP vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- ETAP vs Itron
- ETAP vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- ETAP vs Novity
- ETAP vs GE Digital GridOS
- ETAP vs Enverus Energy Analytics
- ETAP vs Petrel E&P Software
- ETAP vs OpenLink Endur
- ETAP vs P2 Energy Solutions
- ETAP vs Quorum CTRM
- ETAP vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- ETAP vs Cognite Data Fusion
- ETAP vs SolarWinds
- ETAP vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- ETAP vs Pulse Energy Software
- ETAP vs SAP for Utilities
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs ABB Ability
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Aurora Solar
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Enphase Enlighten
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs HOMER Energy
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Trane Tracer Building Management
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Azelio Energy Storage
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Emerson Ovation
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Proxibel Grid Suite
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Siemens Spectrum Power
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs GE Digital Grid Software
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Fluence Energy Management
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Itron
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Novity
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs GE Digital GridOS
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Enverus Energy Analytics
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Petrel E&P Software
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs OpenLink Endur
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs P2 Energy Solutions
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Quorum CTRM
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Cognite Data Fusion
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs SolarWinds
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs Pulse Energy Software
- Wood Mackenzie Lens vs SAP for Utilities
