Energy · head to head
ETAP vs Quorum CTRM

ETAP
Energy
Electrical power system design and analysis software
- From
- $5000/year
- Rated
- -

Quorum CTRM
Energy
Commodity trading and risk management for energy
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ETAP no pricing is published, and reaching a figure requires completing a multi step quote form; Quorum CTRM no price, licensing model, deployment option cost or contract term is published; there is no pricing page linked from the site
- They diverge on capability: ETAP covers Load flow analysis, Quorum CTRM covers Deal capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ETAP and Quorum CTRM actually diverge.
| Attribute | ETAP | Quorum CTRM |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $5000/year | On request |
| Platforms | Windows, Api | Web, Desktop, Api |
| Founded | 1986 | 1998 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Energy).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ETAP
- Load flow analysis
- Short circuit analysis
- Arc flash analysis
- Protective device coordination
- Harmonics analysis
- Transient stability
- Cable sizing
- Panel schedule design
Only in Quorum CTRM
- Deal capture
- Position management
- Risk analytics
- Credit management
- Settlement
- Regulatory compliance
- Market data
- Reporting
Both cover
- Data encryption
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ETAP
- Electrical power system modelling, simulation and analysisnot Quorum CTRM
- Arc flash, load flow and protection coordination studiesnot Quorum CTRM
Quorum CTRM
- Upstream oil and gas production accounting and well operationsnot ETAP
- Midstream pipeline and LNG managementnot ETAP
- Energy trading and risk management across the value chainnot ETAP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ETAP
- No pricing is published, and reaching a figure requires completing a multi step quote form
- Subscription durations offered are 3 years and 5 years, so there is no short commitment option
- Licences are banded by user count rather than sold individually, in brackets of 1, 5 to 15, 15 to 25, 25 to 50 and over 50
- National and international network licences are priced separately
Quorum CTRM
- No price, licensing model, deployment option cost or contract term is published; there is no pricing page linked from the site
- The only routes to a figure are a demo request form and a sales contact form
Pricing, plan by plan
ETAP
$5000/year- Standard$5000/year
- Load flow analysis
- Short circuit analysis
- Arc flash analysis
- Professional$15000/year
- Advanced analysis
- Protective device coordination
- Harmonics analysis
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Real-time monitoring
- SCADA integration
- Custom modules
Quorum CTRM
On request- Trading$undefined/custom
- Deal capture
- Position management
- P&L reporting
- Risk Management$undefined/custom
- VaR calculations
- Stress testing
- Credit risk
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Full ETRM suite
- Multi-commodity
- Global deployment
Which should you pick?
Choose ETAP if
- You need load flow analysis.
- You work on Windows, Api.
- You also want short circuit analysis.
Choose Quorum CTRM if
- You need deal capture.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Api.
- You also want position management.
Questions people ask
- Is ETAP or Quorum CTRM better?
- Neither clearly leads. ETAP starts at $5000/year and Quorum CTRM at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ETAP or Quorum CTRM?
- ETAP starts at $5000/year and Quorum CTRM at On request.
- Does ETAP or Quorum CTRM run on more platforms?
- ETAP runs on Windows, Api. Quorum CTRM runs on Web, Desktop, Api.
- What is ETAP best used for?
- ETAP is most often used for electrical power system modelling, simulation and analysis, arc flash, load flow and protection coordination studies. Of those, electrical power system modelling, simulation and analysis and arc flash, load flow and protection coordination studies are not what Quorum CTRM is typically brought in for.
- What can ETAP do that Quorum CTRM cannot?
- ETAP covers Load flow analysis, Short circuit analysis, Arc flash analysis, Protective device coordination. Quorum CTRM covers Deal capture, Position management, Risk analytics, Credit management. Both handle Data encryption, Cloud deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ETAP: How is ETAP priced?
ETAP uses subscription-based pricing with tiered bundles (Launch, Grow, Scale) and optional add-ons. Specific prices are not published and require completing a quote request form.
SourceQuorum CTRM: How much does Quorum CTRM cost?
Quorum CTRM does not publish pricing on its website. Customers must request a demo or contact the sales team to receive customized pricing quotes based on their specific needs and usage.
SourceETAP: What products does ETAP offer pricing for?
ETAP offers three main product lines with tiered bundles: CANECO (Electrical Design), ETAP (Power Systems Analysis), and SEE Electrical (Electrical Engineering). Each supports 1-50+ users with 3-5 year term options.
SourceQuorum CTRM: Does Quorum offer pricing information online?
No, Quorum Software does not display pricing tiers or cost information on their public website. Pricing is customized and obtained through direct consultation with the sales team.
SourceRelated pages
More on Quorum CTRM
Other head to heads
- ETAP vs ABB Ability
- ETAP vs Aurora Solar
- ETAP vs Enphase Enlighten
- ETAP vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- ETAP vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- ETAP vs HOMER Energy
- ETAP vs Trane Tracer Building Management
- ETAP vs Azelio Energy Storage
- ETAP vs Emerson Ovation
- ETAP vs Proxibel Grid Suite
- ETAP vs Siemens Spectrum Power
- ETAP vs GE Digital Grid Software
- ETAP vs Fluence Energy Management
- ETAP vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- ETAP vs Itron
- ETAP vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- ETAP vs Novity
- ETAP vs GE Digital GridOS
- ETAP vs OpenLink Endur
- ETAP vs OATI webOASIS
- ETAP vs Enverus Energy Analytics
- ETAP vs Petrel E&P Software
- ETAP vs Enerex
- ETAP vs P2 Energy Solutions
- ETAP vs Wood Mackenzie Lens
- ETAP vs Johnson Controls Metasys
- ETAP vs Oracle Utilities
- ETAP vs Siemens EnergyIP
- ETAP vs SolarWinds
- ETAP vs OATI webSmartEnergy
- Quorum CTRM vs ABB Ability
- Quorum CTRM vs Aurora Solar
- Quorum CTRM vs Enphase Enlighten
- Quorum CTRM vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Quorum CTRM vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- Quorum CTRM vs HOMER Energy
- Quorum CTRM vs Trane Tracer Building Management
- Quorum CTRM vs Azelio Energy Storage
- Quorum CTRM vs Emerson Ovation
- Quorum CTRM vs Proxibel Grid Suite
- Quorum CTRM vs Siemens Spectrum Power
- Quorum CTRM vs GE Digital Grid Software
- Quorum CTRM vs Fluence Energy Management
- Quorum CTRM vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- Quorum CTRM vs Itron
- Quorum CTRM vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- Quorum CTRM vs Novity
- Quorum CTRM vs GE Digital GridOS
- Quorum CTRM vs OpenLink Endur
- Quorum CTRM vs OATI webOASIS
- Quorum CTRM vs Enverus Energy Analytics
- Quorum CTRM vs Petrel E&P Software
- Quorum CTRM vs Enerex
- Quorum CTRM vs P2 Energy Solutions
- Quorum CTRM vs Wood Mackenzie Lens
- Quorum CTRM vs Johnson Controls Metasys
- Quorum CTRM vs Oracle Utilities
- Quorum CTRM vs Siemens EnergyIP
- Quorum CTRM vs SolarWinds
- Quorum CTRM vs OATI webSmartEnergy
